FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look more in depth at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the AV200 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe AV200 was manufactured 23 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS making them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the AV200 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| AV200 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the FujiFilm AV200
| XZ-2 iHS | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 23 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| AV200 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 offers outer measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the AV200 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and XZ-2 iHS is 94 and 85 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The AV200 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the FujiFilm AV200 will produce greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images more aggressively. The older AV200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm AV200 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Also called as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 340 images |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $450 |