FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
![FujiFilm FinePix AV200 front FujiFilm FinePix AV200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200/FujiFilm-AV200-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZS35/Panasonic-ZS35-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the FujiFilm AV200 versus Panasonic ZS35, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Panasonic. The image resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the ZS35 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
The AV200 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the ZS35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the AV200 grades versus the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The entire galleries are available at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Panasonic ZS35
AV200 | ZS35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the FujiFilm AV200
ZS35 | AV200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 36 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Panasonic ZS35
AV200 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and proportions. The FujiFilm AV200 has physical measurements of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has measurements of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check out the FujiFilm AV200 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the AV200 and the ZS35.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZS35-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the AV200 and ZS35 is 94 and 89 respectively.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZS35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The picture here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the AV200 and ZS35.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Panasonic ZS35 to produce extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged AV200 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZS35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-AV200-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-ZS35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm AV200 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 168 gr (0.37 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 photographs | - |
Type of battery | AA | - |
Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $300 |