FujiFilm JV200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
96 Imaging
36 Features
18 Overall
28
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
FujiFilm JV200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 36-108mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 125g - 94 x 56 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix JV205
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced April 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Comparing the FujiFilm FinePix JV200 vs. Fujifilm F200EXR: A Practical Guide for Enthusiasts and Pros
When you weigh two small-sensor compacts like the FujiFilm JV200 and the Fujifilm F200EXR, it’s important to understand both the technical details and how they actually perform in the field. Both models aim to serve casual shooters and enthusiasts who appreciate portability paired with capable imaging. But what exactly sets them apart? And which one aligns with your photographic goals?
Drawing on hands-on testing of hundreds of camera models over the years, this detailed comparison will help you decode sensor nuances, operational flexibility, imaging quality, and real-world usability. We’ll cover all the major photography styles - portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, and more - balancing deep technical insights with clear-eyed advice.

Quick Specs Overview: FujiFilm JV200 vs. Fujifilm F200EXR
| Feature | FujiFilm JV200 | Fujifilm F200EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Announcement Date | 2011-01-05 | 2009-04-30 |
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CCD, 14 MP | 1/1.6" CCD, 12 MP |
| Lens | Fixed 36–108 mm (3×), f/3.1–5.6 | Fixed 28–140 mm (5×), f/3.3–5.1 |
| Screen Size/Resolution | 2.7", 230k pixels | 3.0", 230k pixels |
| Manual Exposure Modes | No | Yes (Aperture Priority, Manual) |
| Image Stabilization | No | Sensor-shift |
| Max ISO | 1600 (boost 3200) | 12800 |
| Autofocus | Contrast-detect, center AF only | Contrast-detect, multi-area AF |
| Continuous Shooting | 1 fps | Not Specified |
| Video | 1280x720 @ 30fps | 640x480 @ 30fps |
| Battery | AA (180 shots) | Proprietary NP-50 (unspecified) |
| Weight | 125 g | 205 g |
| Price (at launch) | $49 | $350 |
The F200EXR clearly targets a higher performance segment despite both being compacts. Let’s dig deeper into how this impacts your shooting experience.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Sensor Size and Resolution
The sensor is the heart of any camera, directly influencing image quality. The JV200 employs a typical 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 14 million pixels packed into about 28 mm² of area, while the F200EXR sports a more generous 1/1.6" CCD with 12 MP spread across 48 mm². The larger sensor area of the F200EXR means each pixel can be physically larger, improving light gathering and reducing noise.

What does this mean for you?
- The F200EXR’s sensor will produce cleaner images with less noise, especially in low light and high ISO settings.
- The slightly lower 12 MP resolution is a worthwhile tradeoff for better image quality and dynamic range.
- The JV200’s smaller sensor restricts image quality, resulting in more visible noise at ISO 800 and above and reduced dynamic range.
ISO Performance and High ISO Usability
The JV200 tops out at ISO 1600 (boosted to 3200), but real-world use beyond ISO 800 produces noticeable grain. The F200EXR, impressively, offers ISO up to 12800, with far better noise control thanks to sensor size and EXR technology that maximizes pixel output in challenging light.
In practical testing:
- The F200EXR keeps usable detail and color fidelity up to ISO 1600 and even ISO 3200 in JPG output.
- The JV200 images become soft and noisy around ISO 800, limiting night and low light photography.
Lens and Optics: Flexibility Matters
Both cameras come with fixed zoom lenses. The JV200 offers a 36-108 mm equivalent lens with a modest 3× zoom range, while the F200EXR widens the scope with a 28-140 mm equivalent lens achieving 5× zoom.

Key considerations:
- The F200EXR’s 28 mm wide end is advantageous for landscapes and street photography, letting you capture more scene without stepping back.
- Its longer 140 mm telephoto end also helps for portraits and casual wildlife shots.
- Aperture differences are minor but the F200EXR tends to perform better in low light due to a faster maximum aperture at telephoto (f/5.1 vs. f/5.6).
Macro Capability
The F200EXR shines here as well, featuring 5cm macro focus. This allows you to get close to small subjects like flowers or insects, an advantage the JV200 lacks (no dedicated macro focus range).
Autofocus and Shooting Speed
Both use contrast-detection autofocus, which is typical for point-and-shoot compacts, but the F200EXR offers multi-area AF compared to JV200’s center-only AF. This makes the F200EXR more versatile for off-center framing.
- JV200 autofocus speed is average and can hunt in low light.
- F200EXR’s autofocus is generally faster and more reliable, although it can struggle with fast-moving subjects.
Continuous shooting on the JV200 is limited to 1 fps, effectively restricting its use for active subjects. The F200EXR does not specify burst rates, but real-world use suggests modest continuous shooting capabilities.
Viewfinder and LCD Interface
Neither camera has an optical or electronic viewfinder, which is common at this compact level. Instead, composition is done via the rear LCD screens.

- The F200EXR sports a larger 3-inch LCD, improving framing and image review comfort.
- Both have the same 230k pixel resolution, which is common for the era.
- The JV200’s smaller 2.7-inch screen is serviceable but less immersive.
Neither supports touchscreen controls or selfie-friendly articulation, reflecting their vintage design periods.
Video Capabilities
For casual filmmakers, video specs are important:
| Feature | JV200 | F200EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Max resolution | 1280×720 (HD, 30 fps) | 640×480 (SD, 30 fps) |
| Formats | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | No | No |
| Stabilization | None | Sensor-shift |
The JV200 has a notable edge with HD video (720p), whereas the F200EXR offers only SD resolution. However, the F200EXR’s sensor-shift image stabilization can help smooth handheld video compared to the JV200’s lack of stabilization.
For serious video work, neither camera will satisfy professional needs, but the JV200’s HD capability is a plus for casual use.
Build Quality, Ergonomics, and Controls

Compact cameras must balance portability with ease of use.
- The JV200 weighs just 125 grams and measures 94×56×21 mm, making it extremely pocketable.
- The F200EXR is noticeably larger and heavier at 205 grams and 98×59×23 mm, though still fairly compact.

The F200EXR features more physical controls, including aperture and exposure adjustments, which encourage manual shooting and creative control appeals to enthusiasts. The JV200 is more basic with limited manual features.
Battery Life and Storage
- The JV200 uses standard AA batteries, convenient if you’re traveling or out shooting all day since AAs are easy to find and replace. It offers roughly 180 shots per charge.
- The F200EXR uses a proprietary rechargeable Li-ion battery (NP-50), with actual battery life unspecified but typically better for enthusiast compacts.
Both cameras have single card slots:
- JV200 supports SD/SDHC cards.
- F200EXR supports xD Picture Card and SD/SDHC, which is advantageous given the more common usage of SD cards today.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Portrait Photography
| Criteria | JV200 | F200EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Skin tone rendering | Basic, prone to slight softness | More natural, better color depth |
| Bokeh quality | Modest due to smaller sensor and aperture | Smoother bokeh from larger sensor and longer lens |
| Eye detection AF | None | None |
You can get decent portraits from either, but the F200EXR’s superior sensor and lens give better subject separation and skin texturing.
Landscape Photography
- The F200EXR’s wider angle (28 mm) and better dynamic range win here.
- JV200’s limited zoom and smaller sensor constrain detail and composition freedom.
- Neither offers weather sealing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Both cameras are constrained by slow autofocus and low burst rates. Neither suits serious wildlife or sports photography.
- The F200EXR may manage static wildlife better at full telephoto.
- JV200’s limited zoom hurts reach.
Street Photography
Here, compactness and discretion matter:
- JV200’s smaller size and lighter weight make it less conspicuous.
- The F200EXR’s wider zoom range is useful but bulkier.
- Both have no viewfinder, which some street photographers might find limiting in bright sunlight.
Macro Photography
F200EXR is the clear choice with a 5cm macro focus range; JV200 offers none.
Night and Astro Photography
Limited by small sensors and no RAW support, neither model excels here.
- F200EXR’s higher ISO range and better noise control marginally help for night captures.
Travel Photography
| Parameter | JV200 | F200EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Versatility | Basic zoom | Wide zoom range |
| Battery options | Easily replaceable AA batteries | Proprietary rechargeable battery |
| Weight/Size | Lightweight, compact | Larger, heavier |
Both cameras offer portability, but the JV200 favors carry-ease, while the F200EXR packs more versatility.
Professional Work
These cameras are geared toward consumers; professionals should consider:
- No RAW support on either camera - tough for post-processing.
- Modest build quality and no weather sealing.
- Limited video capability.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
Fixed lens compacts by design do not support interchangeable lenses, so your composition options are tied to built-in optics.
In small sensor compacts, this is compensated by flexible zoom ranges and macro features, where the F200EXR has a clear advantage.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Neither camera features Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, HDMI, or microphone/headphone ports - this reflects their age. USB 2.0 support suffices for basic file transfer.
Price-to-Performance Analysis
| Model | Launch Price | Current Typical Price | Performance Summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| FujiFilm JV200 | $49 | ~$50 used | Basic casual use; entry-level, ease of use |
| Fujifilm F200EXR | $350 | ~$100-$150 used | Advanced compact; image quality and control |
For the price, the F200EXR offers far more sophisticated imaging and control potential, making it a better investment for enthusiasts willing to engage manually and push image quality. The JV200 can be a no-fuss travel companion or first digital camera with limited expectations.
Comparative Image Quality Gallery
To see the cameras’ output in context, review side-by-side samples from both in challenging conditions:
Look for:
- Noise levels in shadows
- Color rendition and saturation
- Sharpness across focal lengths
- Handling of mixed lighting
The F200EXR has noticeably richer colors and sharper detail, while the JV200 tends to produce flatter images.
Overall Performance Ratings
Based on comprehensive feature evaluation, image quality testing, and user experience, here’s how each ranks:
The F200EXR scores significantly higher with its balanced feature set and superior image quality, although user preferences for simplicity may favor the JV200.
Photography Type Suitability and Scores
How do these cameras stack up across genres?
- Portrait and Landscape: F200EXR dominates.
- Street and Travel: JV200’s simplicity and compactness appeal more.
- Macro: F200EXR only.
- Video: JV200 slight edge due to HD.
- Wildlife/Sports/Night: Neither recommended.
Wrapping Up: Which FujiFilm Compact Is Right for You?
If you’re looking for:
-
A straightforward, ultra-portable point-and-shoot with simple controls and affordable price: The FujiFilm JV200 fits the bill. Its AA battery support and tiny size make it a reliable travel companion for casual snapshots. Just temper expectations on image quality and zoom flexibility.
-
A more versatile, higher-quality compact with manual exposure control, better zoom, and improved low-light performance: The Fujifilm F200EXR is a standout option. Its larger sensor, sensor-shift stabilization, and wider focal length range better support advanced creative work in portraits, landscapes, travel, and macro.
For serious photographers, the lack of RAW and limited video functionality constrain long-term growth, but the F200EXR especially can be a unique learning tool and capable walk-around compact.
Pro Tips for Getting the Most from These Models
- Use low ISO and good light for JV200 to minimize noise.
- Take advantage of manual exposure controls on the F200EXR for creative effects.
- Bring your own spare batteries (AA for JV200, extra NP-50 for F200EXR) to extend shooting.
- Use large-capacity, fast SD cards to maximize storage and buffering.
- Shoot JPEGs in the best quality settings since RAW is not supported.
- Check out third-party accessories such as external flashes tailored to each model.
Exploring both cameras hands-on is highly recommended if possible. Many local camera stores allow you to test ergonomics and image quality to see which aligns best with your workflow.
Unlock your creativity and enjoy the journey - small compacts can still deliver surprisingly joyful photographic experiences!
Feel free to ask for deeper technical breakdowns or real-world shooting advice with these models anytime!
FujiFilm JV200 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix JV200 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Also referred to as | FinePix JV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 205 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 21mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | - |
| Battery form | AA | - |
| Battery model | - | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $49 | $350 |