FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
![FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350/FujiFilm-JX350-front.jpg)
![Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-WG-4/Ricoh-WG-4-front.jpg)
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also Known as FinePix JX355
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Here is a complete review of the FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the JX350 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The JX350 was released 4 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the JX350 scores versus the WG-4 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JX350 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm JX350 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX350 over the Ricoh WG-4
JX350 | WG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the FujiFilm JX350
WG-4 | JX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 37 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh WG-4
JX350 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm JX350 features exterior measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the JX350 and the WG-4.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JX350 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the JX350 and WG-4.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size and the identical megapixels and you should expect similar quality of photographs though you will want to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The older JX350 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-WG-4-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Also called as | FinePix JX355 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1800 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 shots | 240 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-45A | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $200 | $330 |