FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Released January 2020
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands FujiFilm and Nikon. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and P950 (16MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and P950 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe S200EXR was unveiled 11 years earlier than the P950 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the S200EXR grades against the P950 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR & Nikon Coolpix P950. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery & Nikon P950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Nikon P950
| S200EXR | P950 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the FujiFilm S200EXR
| P950 | S200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2020 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 127 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display dimensions | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950
| S200EXR | P950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR has outer dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") accompanied by a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) whilst the Nikon P950 has proportions of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") having a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the S200EXR vs the P950.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the S200EXR and P950 is 54 and 52 respectively.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the S200EXR and P950.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The S200EXR having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Nikon P950 will offer you extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The older S200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix P950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Nikon Coolpix P950 |
| Other name | FinePix S205EXR | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2020-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 24-2000mm (83.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 90 percent |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 300s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 865 grams (1.91 lb) | 1005 grams (2.22 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-140 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $500 | $797 |
