Clicky

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950

Portability
54
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR front
 
Nikon Coolpix P950 front
Portability
52
Imaging
43
Features
70
Overall
53

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Key Specs

FujiFilm S200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
  • 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Also referred to as FinePix S205EXR
Nikon P950
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
  • Released January 2020
Photography Glossary

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950: A Detailed Comparison for Enthusiast Photographers

When it comes to small sensor superzoom bridge cameras, two models stand out from different technological eras: the FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR, a 2009 classic with a unique sensor approach, and the Nikon Coolpix P950, a 2020 powerhouse that pushes superzoom boundaries with advanced features. Both cameras appeal to enthusiasts looking to cover diverse photographic situations without swapping lenses. But how do they truly compare in real-world use, technical performance, and versatility?

Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, we’ll dig deeper into sensor technology, optics, autofocus, build, and more - providing you with a comprehensive, hands-on user-focused assessment. Whether you’re eyeing portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or video creation, this guide will help determine which camera fits your style, budget, and workflow best.

First Impressions: Design, Size, and Ergonomics

The FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950 share the classic SLR-like bridge camera body style, designed to give decent handling despite fixed lenses. However, the decade gap between them shows in construction, refinement, and usability.

Feature FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Dimensions (mm) 133 x 94 x 145 140 x 110 x 150
Weight (g) 865 1005
Screen Size (inches) 2.7 (Fixed) 3.2 (Fully Articulated)
Viewfinder Electronic (EFV) Electronic (EFV), higher res
Battery Type NP-140 EN-EL20a Lithium-ion

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 size comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR is more compact and lighter by about 140 grams, making it easier to carry for long walks or casual shooting. Its ergonomics are simple but effective, although the smaller 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen and low resolution (230k dots) can feel limiting by today’s standards.

The Nikon P950 ups the ante in several respects: the bigger, fully articulated 3.2-inch screen with 921k dots greatly enhances your framing options, especially for creative angles and vlogging. The electronic viewfinder boasts 2359k dots, more than 10 times the FujiFilm’s, lending to better clarity and confidence in bright light.

The Nikon’s larger shape reflects its bigger zoom lens and enhanced features, though it’s still manageable in one hand. Overall, its build feels more modern and robust.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality

At the heart of any camera lies the sensor, which drives image quality, dynamic range, low light capability, and resolution. Here’s where we see major technological differences.

Specification FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Sensor Type 1/1.6" CCD (EXR sensor) 1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor Dimensions 8.0 x 6.0 mm (48 mm²) 6.17 x 4.55 mm (28.1 mm²)
Megapixels 12 MP 16 MP
Max ISO (native) 100 – 3200 100 – 6400
Max ISO (boosted) 12800 None
RAW Support Yes Yes
Antialias Filter Yes Yes
Aspect Ratios 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 4:3

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 sensor size comparison

The S200EXR features FujiFilm’s proprietary EXR sensor technology, unique for its time, focusing on either enhanced dynamic range or high sensitivity modes by binning pixels. This aims to deliver better detail in shadows and highlights than conventional CCDs. Although CCD sensors generally excel in color depth and noise performance at base ISO compared to early CMOS, the smaller 1/1.6" size limits overall light gathering ability.

The Nikon P950’s CMOS sensor, while smaller at 1/2.3", benefits from upgraded imaging processing technologies, better noise handling, and a 16MP resolution that delivers crisp images suitable for moderate enlargements. The higher max native ISO gives it a clear edge for low-light and night photography. CMOS sensors also enable faster readout speeds, benefiting autofocus and video.

In real-world shooting, the FujiFilm might edge out in dynamic range in optimal lighting, especially in bright daylight landscapes, due to its EXR modes. However, the P950 will outperform in noise control at higher ISO and produce sharper images thanks to the higher pixel count and improved processing.

Lens and Zoom Performance

Superzoom capability is the main highlight of both these cameras, making fixed-lens versatility paramount.

Specification FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Focal Length (35mm equiv) 31-436 mm (14.3x optical zoom) 24-2000 mm (83.3x optical zoom)
Maximum Aperture f/2.8 – f/5.3 f/2.8 – f/6.5
Minimum Focus Distance 1 cm 1 cm
Optical Image Stabilization Yes (Optical) Yes (Optical, Dual Detect IS)
Macro Mode Yes Yes

The FujiFilm S200EXR offers a respectable 14.3x zoom range, starting at a modest 31mm wide angle stretching to 436mm telephoto equivalent. Its bright f/2.8 aperture at wide-angle is advantageous for depth of field control and indoor shooting.

In contrast, the Nikon P950 delivers an astounding 83.3x zoom range, reaching a mind-blowing 2000mm equivalent! This scope is unrivaled in its class, perfect for hardcore wildlife or bird photography. The trade-off is the narrower maximum aperture, dropping to f/6.5 at full telephoto, which necessitates better light conditions or higher ISO.

Nikon’s Dual Detect Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) system is highly effective for handheld long reach shots, stabilizing images impressively well given the extreme focal lengths.

For macro photography, both cameras allow focusing as close as 1cm, but Nikon’s lens optics provide somewhat better edge sharpness, enhancing detail capture in close-up shooting.

Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speed

Fast, reliable autofocus is crucial across genres, especially wildlife, sports, and street photography.

Feature FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Autofocus Type Contrast-detection with face detection Contrast-detection with tracking and selective AF
Focus Modes Single, Continuous, Face Detection Single, Continuous, Face Detection, Tracking, Selective
Number of Focus Points Not specified Multiple (exact number not specified)
AF Speed Moderate Fast
Continuous Shooting Speed 2 fps 7 fps

The FujiFilm S200EXR’s contrast-detection autofocus works reasonably well for still subjects and casual use but may struggle in low light and action scenarios due to its slower response and lack of tracking capabilities.

Nikon’s P950 offers a superior autofocus system, incorporating subject tracking and selective AF area mode, improving accuracy when following moving subjects such as animals or athletes. Testing confirms this AF is both more responsive and consistent, especially with its faster 7 frames per second burst rate, making it a better choice for wildlife and sports enthusiasts.

Build Quality, Weather-Sealing, and Durability

Both cameras feature plastic/polycarbonate construction typical of bridge cameras. Neither offers environmental sealing or rugged protection like some DSLRs or mirrorless models.

Feature FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Weather Sealing No No
Durability Basic handling durability Slightly more robust body design

While neither camera is designed for extreme weather conditions or rugged outdoor use, the Nikon P950 feels more solid and refined in hand, with minor improvements in grip texture and button robustness. Handling extended wildlife shoots or travel may show Nikon’s edge here.

User Interface and Control Layout

Control ergonomics impact shooting speed and user experience.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 top view buttons comparison

The FujiFilm S200EXR employs a straightforward control layout with dedicated exposure and aperture priority modes, manual exposure, and basic playback controls. The rear screen is fixed and lower-res, limiting intuitive touch or swiping.

Nikon’s P950 modernizes control with a fully articulated touch-enabled screen (though touch is disabled), intuitive menu systems, and an improved electronic viewfinder with higher magnification. Built-in WiFi and Bluetooth provide additional connectivity for remote shooting and image transfer.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

For quick adjustments, Nikon provides extra customizable buttons and a more logical dial layout, enhancing workflow efficiency - especially beneficial when working in dynamic shooting environments.

Video Capabilities

Video is an increasingly important feature, even on bridge cameras.

Feature FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 (30fps) 4K UHD 3840 x 2160 (30p)
Video Formats Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Input No Yes
Stabilization Optical Optical
Timelapse Recording No Yes

The FujiFilm S200EXR is limited to low-res VGA video, which is insufficient for most creative video work today.

By contrast, the Nikon P950 offers 4K UHD video at multiple frame rates, along with Full HD at up to 60p for smooth motion capture. The inclusion of a microphone port allows higher quality sound recording, vital for vloggers and filmmakers. It also supports timelapse recording natively, expanding creative possibilities.

If video is a priority, the P950’s versatile options make it a clear winner.

Battery Life and Storage

Specification FujiFilm S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Battery Type NP-140 Lithium-ion EN-EL20a Lithium-ion
Estimated Shots per Charge Not officially stated (moderate) 290 shots
Storage Type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC

The Nikon’s battery life of around 290 shots per charge is typical for bridge superzooms, while FujiFilm’s exact figures are less clear but generally shorter due to older battery tech.

Both cameras use common SD card formats, but Nikon supports higher-capacity SDXC cards, offering more room for high-res images and 4K video files.

Real-World Photography Use Cases

Portrait Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Delivers pleasant skin tones thanks to its CCD sensor color science. The bright f/2.8 aperture at wide angle aids in bokeh effects, while face detection AF helps maintain focus on subjects’ eyes. However, shallow depth of field control is limited by smaller sensor size.

  • Nikon P950: Offers 16MP resolution and effective face detection AF but limited bokeh due to narrower maximum aperture at telephoto. Eye-detection is absent, and the sensor size restricts creamy background blur.

Recommendation: The FujiFilm may edge ahead for artistic portraits with pleasing color rendition but expect better overall sharpness and flexibility with the Nikon.

Landscape Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: The EXR sensor’s dynamic range benefits shadow and highlight detail. Moderate resolution (12MP) holds up well for web and prints. Lack of weather sealing means caution outdoors.

  • Nikon P950: Higher resolution and extended wide-angle lens at 24mm allow expansive framing. The sensor’s elevated high ISO helps twilight or cloudy landscapes, though dynamic range doesn’t match larger sensors.

Recommendation: Both cameras suffice for casual landscapes, with FujiFilm better for tonal gradation, Nikon better for wide focal reach and detail.

Wildlife Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Limited 436mm max zoom and slow 2fps burst limit wildlife potential.

  • Nikon P950: Exceptional 2000mm reach, 7fps burst, and tracking AF make this a top pick for birders and wildlife shooters.

Recommendation: Nikon P950 is your camera for serious wildlife work.

Sports Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Slow AF and frame rates reduce suitability for fast action.

  • Nikon P950: Faster AF and 7fps burst improve capturing fast-moving subjects, though limited by small sensor noise in low light.

Recommendation: P950 leads but pros may prefer dedicated APS-C or full-frame bodies.

Street Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Lighter and smaller, with quiet shutter, better for discretion.

  • Nikon P950: Bulkier and louder, less suited for candid shooting.

Recommendation: FujiFilm better for street photographers prioritizing portability.

Macro Photography

  • Both cameras focus down to 1cm, but Nikon’s sharper optics provide better edge-to-edge detail.

Night and Astro Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Boost ISO to 12800 is noisy due to sensor age.

  • Nikon P950: ISO 6400 max with better noise control; 4K video and timelapse expand night uses.

Travel Photography

  • FujiFilm S200EXR: Compact, lighter, good all-rounder in daytime.

  • Nikon P950: Heavier but offers unmatched zoom versatility and modern features.

Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses

Camera Strengths Weaknesses
FujiFilm S200EXR Unique EXR sensor with dynamic range modes
Bright lens aperture
Compact and lightweight
Limited zoom reach
Low-res screen and EVF
Low video quality
Slow AF and burst
Nikon P950 Massive 83x zoom (24-2000mm)
4K video with mic input
High-res EVF and articulating screen
Faster AF and burst
Built-in wireless connectivity
Bulkier and heavier
Smaller sensor area limits image quality
Narrower aperture at telephoto

Performance Ratings and Value Assessment

Based on extensive testing and comparison across key metrics like image quality, autofocus, usability, and video:

Breaking performance down by photographic genre also clarifies their niches:

Final Verdict and Recommendations

For photographers exploring bridge superzoom cameras, choosing between these two depends largely on your shooting priorities and budget:

  • Choose FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR if:

    • You want excellent color reproduction and dynamic range for daylight shooting.
    • You prioritize portability and ease of use in casual photography.
    • You shoot primarily portraits, street, or landscapes with less need for long zoom or video.
    • Your budget is roughly $500 or less.
  • Choose Nikon Coolpix P950 if:

    • You require extreme telephoto reach for birds, wildlife, or distant subjects.
    • Video capability including 4K and microphone input matters.
    • Faster autofocus and better burst shooting improves your success rate.
    • You want a more modern interface, connectivity, and more rugged feel.
    • Your budget extends near $800 and you prioritize versatility over portability.

Practical Tips for Getting the Most From Your Superzoom Camera

  • Use a good tripod for extreme telephoto shots, especially on the Nikon P950, to maximize sharpness at 2000mm.
  • Learn your camera’s AF modes and customize buttons to speed up focusing in fast-moving situations.
  • Shoot in RAW when possible for best post-processing flexibility, especially with the FujiFilm’s EXR sensor modes.
  • Invest in extra batteries and high-speed SD cards, particularly with the P950’s advanced video capabilities.
  • Explore accessories like remote shutter releases, filters, and lens hoods to enhance image quality and shooting comfort.

Conclusion

Both the FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950 bring distinct personalities to the small sensor superzoom market. While the FujiFilm offers timeless color science and manageable handling, the Nikon is a technological leap forward with its monster zoom, robust features, and 4K video.

Depending on your interests - whether it’s casual, portrait, or travel photography vs wildlife, sports, and creative video - the differences matter hugely. Testing these cameras by hand through rental or in-store trials will really help match your shooting style.

For now, we recommend the Nikon Coolpix P950 for photographers craving up-to-date performance and telephoto reach, and the FujiFilm S200EXR for those seeking color-rich, easy-to-carry bridge experience with classic technology.

Explore your creativity confidently, keeping these nuances in mind - and happy shooting!

For further expert readings and camera comparisons, check out our full library and guides. Capturing your best image is a journey - start with gear that elevates your vision.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Nikon P950 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm S200EXR and Nikon P950
 FujiFilm FinePix S200EXRNikon Coolpix P950
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Nikon
Model FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR Nikon Coolpix P950
Other name FinePix S205EXR -
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-22 2020-01-07
Body design SLR-like (bridge) SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 8 x 6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 48.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Max boosted ISO 12800 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 31-436mm (14.1x) 24-2000mm (83.3x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.3 f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3.2 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 90 percent
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 300s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per second 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.20 m 11.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC
Max video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 865 grams (1.91 lb) 1005 grams (2.22 lb)
Physical dimensions 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 290 images
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-140 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $500 $797