FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
FujiFilm T200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Released January 2011
- Additionally referred to as FinePix T205
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the T200 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe T200 was unveiled 4 years before the WG-M1 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the T200 matches up against the WG-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix T200 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm T200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm T200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| T200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the FujiFilm T200
| WG-M1 | T200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 44 months |
Common features in the FujiFilm T200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| T200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm T200 has physical measurements of 97mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm T200 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the T200 versus the WG-M1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the T200 and WG-M1 is 94 and 91 respectively.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the T200 and WG-M1.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of files although you will need to consider the age of the products into consideration. The older T200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm T200 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
good MP (14MP)
features face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography highlights
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
environment proof
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
low max ISO (800)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sports photography with FujiFilm T200
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-M1
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (180 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment proof
great battery power (350 shots)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-M1 Travel photography details
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
great reach (280mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery (180 shots)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
great battery power (350 shots)
environment proof
decent megapixels (14MP)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm T200 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-M1 Landscape photography information
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
bad battery (180 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
decent megapixels (14MP)
environment proof
great battery power (350 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (1.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (800)
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm T200
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.4)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic port
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
no mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm T200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix T205 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 lb) | 190 gr (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $160 | $2,000 |