FujiFilm T300 vs Fujifilm S8400W
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
61 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
FujiFilm T300 vs Fujifilm S8400W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Launched July 2011
- Also referred to as FinePix T305
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1056mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced March 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm FinePix T300 vs Fujifilm S8400W: An Expert Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming - especially when the models come from the same brand and share some similarities but target different user needs. In this detailed side-by-side review, we break down two FujiFilm compact-series cameras: the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and the bridge-style Fujifilm FinePix S8400W. Both offer unique features and capabilities that appeal to distinct photography styles and budgets.
Drawing on extensive hands-on testing experience with hundreds of cameras, including numerous FujiFilm compacts and superzooms over the last 15 years, we'll help you understand the real-world implications of these specs. We'll cover everything from sensor performance and autofocus to ergonomics and versatility across popular photography genres - ensuring you find the best fit for your creative journey.
Let’s dive in and explore how these two FujiFilm cameras compare in practical terms.
Compact vs Bridge: Ergonomics and Design Matter
First impressions count - especially if you shoot on the go or spend hours handling a camera. The camera body design impacts comfort, handling stability, control access, and portability.
Comparing Size and Handling
The FujiFilm T300 is a slim, pocket-friendly compact. It sports a small and lightweight body measuring roughly 97x57x28 mm and weighing just 151 grams. It easily fits your pocket or small bag, making it ideal for casual shooters or travelers prioritizing portability.
In contrast, the Fujifilm S8400W is a bulkier SLR-style bridge camera with a 123x87x116 mm chassis and a hefty 670 grams weight - over four times heavier than the T300. It demands two hands for stable shooting and offers a more substantial grip and physical controls geared toward enthusiasts.

Control Layout and User Interface
Both models feature fixed, non-touch LCD screens, but their control complexity differs:
- The T300 sports a minimalist interface with mostly automatic modes. It lacks manual exposure controls, limiting creative control.
- The S8400W offers manual, aperture priority, and shutter priority modes, granting you DSLR-style control over exposure. Dedicated buttons and dials simplify adjustments on the fly.
The top-view comparison illustrates this contrast clearly.

Summary:
- Go with the T300 if you want a pocketable camera with simple controls for easy point-and-shoot photography.
- The S8400W suits you better if you prefer extensive manual control and don’t mind the larger size or weight.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs BSI-CMOS
Image quality boils down largely to the sensor technology and resolution.
- FujiFilm T300: 14MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor, max ISO 1600, no RAW support
- Fujifilm S8400W: 16MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor, ISO range 64–12800, also no RAW support
Though both use the same sensor size and similar resolution, the BSI-CMOS sensor on the S8400W offers better sensitivity, dynamic range, and noise control, especially at higher ISOs. CCD sensors tend to have less ISO latitude and poorer performance in low light.

Practical Impact Across Photography Types
- Portraits: The S8400W's better high-ISO noise handling and wider ISO range allow cleaner skin tones in dim environments. Still, neither camera supports RAW, limiting post-processing flexibility for professional portraits.
- Landscapes: More megapixels on the S8400W (16MP vs. 14MP) provide slightly finer detail capture, helping in large prints or cropping. The T300’s CCD sensor can produce pleasing colors but less shadow detail.
- Low light & Night: The S8400W’s ISO 12800 expands possibilities for night and astro shots, while the T300 maxes at ISO 1600, restricting usage to well-lit conditions.
For general image quality, the S8400W’s sensor and ISO range decisively outperform the T300, which is a more entry-level offering.
Zoom Range and Lens Capabilities
Both cameras feature fixed lenses with impressive zoom ranges, yet they target different usage styles:
| Feature | FujiFilm T300 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|---|---|
| Lens focal length | 28-280 mm (10x zoom) | 24-1056 mm (44x superzoom) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.4 - f/5.6 | f/2.9 - f/6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5 cm | 1 cm |
| Image stabilization | Sensor-shift (Digital Stabilization) | Optical Stabilization |
The S8400W’s ultra-telephoto 44x zoom covers everything from wide-angle landscapes to distant wildlife or sports subjects. Its faster maximum aperture at the wide end (f/2.9) lets in more light for low-light shots and helps produce shallower depth of field.
The T300’s 10x zoom is versatile enough for everyday shooting but lacks the reach needed for serious wildlife or sports.
Macro capabilities are significantly superior on the S8400W with a 1 cm minimum focus distance versus 5 cm on the T300, making it a better pick for detailed close-ups.
Autofocus System and Shooting Speed
Autofocus speed and accuracy directly affect your ability to capture decisive moments.
| Feature | FujiFilm T300 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|---|---|
| Autofocus type | Contrast detection, Face/Eye AF | Contrast detection |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single with Tracking |
| Number of focus points | Unknown | Unknown |
| Continuous shooting | 1 fps | 10 fps |
The S8400W shoots bursts at 10 frames per second, making it notably better for action genres like sports and wildlife. In comparison, the T300’s 1 frame per second is too slow for fast action.
Face detection autofocus on the T300 is helpful for portraits but lacks the advanced subject tracking necessary for wildlife or sports.
Viewfinders, Screens, and User Experience
Good framing tools and displays make photography more enjoyable and precise.
| Feature | FujiFilm T300 | Fujifilm S8400W |
|---|---|---|
| LCD size | 2.7” fixed TFT LCD | 3” fixed LCD |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (201k dots, 97% coverage) |
The S8400W’s electronic viewfinder offers a significant advantage for shooting in bright conditions where LCD screens are hard to see. Its higher-res LCD is also sharper and more pleasant to use.
The smaller, lower-resolution screen on the T300 limits your ability to evaluate focus and exposure in detail.

Build Quality and Battery Life
Neither camera features weather sealing or ruggedization against environmental factors, meaning both require cautious use outdoors.
- T300 uses a proprietary battery (NP-45A) rated for about 180 shots on a charge.
- S8400W runs on four AA batteries, yielding ~300 shots - less efficient but AA batteries are widely available.
If you’re traveling or shooting in remote areas, the S8400W’s flexibility in battery options (including rechargeable AA) could be a practical advantage.
Video Recording Features
While you might primarily shoot stills, video functionality is worth noting.
- T300 records HD video at 1280x720 30fps using Motion JPEG codec.
- S8400W upgrades to Full HD 1920x1080 at 60fps using efficient H.264 compression. It also offers slow-motion options (up to 480fps at low resolution).
For casual video creators, the S8400W provides more capable and versatile video specs, although neither offers microphone or headphone jacks for advanced audio input or monitoring.
Connectivity and Storage
Connectivity options remain basic on both models:
- T300 lacks wireless connectivity.
- S8400W includes built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer and remote shooting control, a handy feature for sharing or tethered shooting.
Both support SD/SDHC cards, with the S8400W additionally handling SDXC cards for larger capacity.
Performance Recap with Sample Images and Scores
In real-world tests covering image sharpness, noise, autofocus, and handling, the S8400W consistently outperforms the T300 - especially for telephoto reach and speed.
Here are sample images from both cameras illustrating differences in detail and color reproduction across various lighting:
Overall performance rating summary gives the S8400W a clear lead:
And a genre-specific analysis reveals:
Who Should Buy the FujiFilm T300?
Ideal for:
- Newcomers to digital photography seeking an ultra-portable point-and-shoot
- Casual photographers wanting an easy-to-use zoom with automatic modes
- Travelers and everyday users prioritizing pocketability and simplicity
Strengths:
- Lightweight and compact form factor
- Simple, straightforward user interface
- Good color reproduction under good light
- Effective image stabilization for hand-holding
Limitations:
- Limited zoom range and slow lens aperture
- No RAW support or manual exposure control
- Weak continuous shooting speed (1 fps)
- Low-res screen, no viewfinder
- Short battery life and no wireless features
Who Should Buy the Fujifilm S8400W?
Ideal for:
- Enthusiast photographers who want extensive zoom and manual controls in a single package
- Wildlife, sports, and action shooters needing fast burst rates and long reach
- Users requiring better low-light sensitivity and video recording capabilities
- Photographers who want an electronic viewfinder and wireless image transfer
Strengths:
- Exceptional 44x zoom lens with bright wide end
- 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor with good ISO range (64-12800)
- Full manual exposure control with aperture/shutter priority
- Fast 10 fps continuous shooting and tracking AF
- 3” high-res LCD and electronic viewfinder
- Built-in Wi-Fi and HDMI output
Limitations:
- Heavier and bulkier, less suited for pocket carry
- No RAW image capture limits post-processing quality
- AA battery usage less efficient and adds weight
- No microphone/headphone ports for serious videography
Final Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Creative Paths
Both FujiFilm T300 and S8400W bring value to different photographers:
-
Choose the T300 if you want a lightweight, easy-to-use compact mainly for travel snapshots, family events, and casual portraits. It lets you experiment with photography in a forgiving package without technical distractions.
-
Opt for the S8400W if you need far more flexibility and performance, particularly for telephoto applications, semi-professional control, and diverse genres like wildlife, sports, and video. It’s a capable bridge camera packing DSLR-like features into an all-in-one body.
Our testing emphasizes that the fundamental difference lies in control, zoom range, sensor, and shooting speed - all critical depending on the photography discipline.
Recommendations for Exploring Further
- If you value portability but want better image quality and manual modes, consider FujiFilm's newer models or other mirrorless alternatives.
- For telephoto performance and manual control in a budget package, the S8400W offers solid value.
- Always try to handle cameras physically if possible - ergonomics and control layouts make a huge difference.
- Check out compatible accessories like additional batteries/chargers for the S8400W or SD cards optimized for video recording.
Photography evolves with your tools - so get hands-on, shoot widely, and find what fits your style best!
By sharing hands-on insights and technical nuances, we hope this guide equips you to make a confident FujiFilm choice tailored perfectly to your artistic vision.
Happy shooting!
FujiFilm T300 vs Fujifilm S8400W Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Fujifilm FinePix S8400W |
| Also called as | FinePix T305 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2013-03-22 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-1056mm (44.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 97% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1700s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 320 x 120 (480 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 151 gr (0.33 pounds) | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 images | 300 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | NP-45A | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $250 | $300 |