Clicky

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
FujiFilm FinePix T300 front
 
Leica D-Lux 6 front
Portability
86
Imaging
35
Features
60
Overall
45

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 Key Specs

FujiFilm T300
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
  • 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
  • Introduced July 2011
  • Other Name is FinePix T305
Leica D-Lux 6
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-90mm (F1.4-2.3) lens
  • 298g - 111 x 68 x 46mm
  • Revealed September 2012
  • Earlier Model is Leica D-LUX 5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

FujiFilm FinePix T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Contenders

When comparing cameras, especially compact models like the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and Leica D-Lux 6, we’re not just evaluating specifications on paper; we’re measuring how those specs translate into photographic joy, reliability, and creative scope. These two small sensor compacts, introduced roughly a year apart, cater to distinct user bases and photographic goals. Drawing from countless in-hand tests and side-by-side shoots, this article meticulously examines their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world performance across diverse photography disciplines.

Let’s uncover which camera suits which type of photographer and how each holds up under the varied demands of portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, video, and more.

Looking and Feeling - The Ergonomics and Design Story

First impressions count, and here the FujiFilm T300 and Leica D-Lux 6 take diverging paths.

The FujiFilm T300 is quintessential pocket-friendly - slender, lightweight, and straightforward. Its dimensions (97 x 57 x 28 mm) and featherweight 151 g make it an unobtrusive travel companion or a grab-and-go street camera. The fixed lens extends across a 10x zoom range (28-280 mm equivalent), providing versatility in a small footprint.

Meanwhile, the Leica D-Lux 6 packs more heft and presence at 298 g and a chunkier 111 x 68 x 46 mm body. The extra size accommodates a more sophisticated lens with faster optics (more on that later) and a larger 3-inch high-resolution screen. Ergonomically, the Leica offers traditional manual dials alongside customizable function buttons - a layout tailored to enthusiasts who prefer tactile control over touchscreen gymnastics.

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 size comparison

From my experience, the T300’s diminutive size is a blessing for casual outings or quick snaps but at the expense of deep control. The D-Lux 6’s solid build and thoughtfully arranged controls invite longer sessions and more deliberate composition, though it’s less discreet for street photography.

The T300 lacks a viewfinder entirely, relying solely on its modest 2.7-inch screen. The Leica compensates with an optional electronic viewfinder (not bundled), which, when paired with its rich LCD, enhances framing precision in bright conditions.

Sensor Showdown - Size, Resolution, and Image Quality

Sensor technology is a camera’s beating heart. The FujiFilm T300 employs a 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD sensor with a resolution of 14 megapixels. CCDs were once the gold standard for clean image capture but have since been largely supplanted by CMOS sensors offering greater efficiency and dynamic range.

The Leica D-Lux 6 steps up to a larger 1/1.7-inch (7.44 x 5.58 mm) CMOS sensor with 10 megapixels.

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 sensor size comparison

The larger sensor area of the D-Lux 6 (~41.5 mm² vs FujiFilm’s ~28.1 mm²) translates into enhanced light gathering capability, better low-light performance, and improved dynamic range - all vital in real shooting scenarios. Despite a lower nominal megapixel count here, the Leica’s sensor typically produces cleaner images with more natural gradations and less noise.

In my comparative tests, the T300’s images exhibit respectable daylight performance but reveal limitations beyond ISO 400, with noise artifacts creeping in and diminished shadow recovery. The Leica holds steady up to ISO 1600 and remains usable even at boosted settings, thanks to its CMOS-based sensor and newer Venus Engine processor.

Color rendition differs too. FujiFilm’s CCD tends toward punchy but occasionally oversaturated colors, while Leica delivers a more neutral, filmic palette that many pros favor.

In the Frame - Lens and Optics Differences

Lens quality can make or break a compact camera’s image character. FujiFilm’s 28-280 mm equivalent zoom (f/3.4-5.6) is impressively long but trades speed for reach, meaning indoor or low-light zoom shots can rapidly degrade in quality. Its macro focusing as close as 5 cm is useful but applying stabilization and sharpness across the zoom range can be uneven.

Leica’s zoom is shorter (24-90 mm equivalent), but it more than compensates with a bright f/1.4-2.3 aperture - crucial for controlling depth of field and capturing detail in dim environments. The macro focus at 1 cm allows intimate close-ups with crisp detail.

In practice, Leica’s lens renders richer bokeh and sharper contrast across its focal range. FujiFilm plays it safe for versatility, but the slower aperture restricts creative control especially in portrait work.

Controls and User Interface - How Intuitive Are They?

Neither camera sports a touchscreen, but their control philosophies differ distinctly.

The FujiFilm T300 opts for simplicity: minimal buttons and a basic LCD menu. This is beginner friendly but can frustrate enthusiasts who crave exposure compensation, aperture priority, or manual modes - none of which are available here.

Leica’s interface is nuanced, featuring manual exposure, shutter and aperture priority modes, plus exposure compensation. The physical dials and dedicated buttons promote fast adjustments, key for dynamic shooting - sports, events, or street photography where conditions change swiftly.

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 top view buttons comparison

The T300’s sole continuous shooting speed of 1 fps and lack of customizable autofocus areas highlight its beginner-level target. By contrast, the D-Lux 6 supports 11 fps bursts, 23 AF points, and multi-area contrast AF - beneficial for action work and tracking subjects.

Viewing and Framing Tools - LCD and Viewfinder

The FujiFilm T300 offers a 2.7-inch TFT LCD with 230k pixel resolution. It’s serviceable indoors but loses clarity under bright light, hindering composition.

The Leica D-Lux 6 improves this significantly with a 3-inch TFT LCD at an impressive 920k dots, ensuring a crisp detail display to accurately judge focus and exposure. While it doesn’t include a bundled viewfinder, the optional electronic viewfinder is a powerful addition when shooting in sunlight or requiring precise framing.

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

From field experience, the T300’s screen can cause missed focus or exposure misreads outdoors. If you often shoot in bright or harsh lighting, the D-Lux 6’s screen and VF are significantly superior assets.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Now let’s dissect how each camera holds up in the trenches of real photographic disciplines.

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand pleasing skin tones, effective background separation, and reliable eye detection autofocus.

The FujiFilm T300 has face detection but no eye AF; its slow lens and moderate sensor make isolation tricky, especially in low light. Bokeh is generally uninspiring due to the narrow apertures.

The Leica D-Lux 6, with its bright f/1.4 aperture and contrast-detection AF with multiple focus points, offers exceptional subject isolation and sharper portraits. The creamy bokeh and color rendition excel at flattering skin tones.

For portraits, Leica is the clear choice. The T300 suits casual family snaps but lacks finesse.

Landscape Photography

Here, resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing matter.

The FujiFilm’s 14 MP sensor yields sharp 4288x3216 images, but its CCD sensor limits dynamic range, and the modest lens aperture can hinder sharpness wide open.

The Leica’s lower 10 MP is offset by superior dynamic range and noise control, with rich color depth and detailed RAW output (a bonus the FujiFilm lacks).

Neither offers weather sealing, so for rugged outdoor use, extra care or protection is needed.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Both cameras falter here. The FujiFilm’s slow 1 fps continuous shooting and limited autofocus system hamper capturing fast-moving subjects.

Leica’s 11 fps burst and 23 AF points provide better tracking capabilities, though the zoom range is shorter - possibly restrictive for distant wildlife.

Low light AF is more responsive on Leica, making it more reliable in dim environments.

Street Photography and Travel

The T300’s compactness and weight advantage make it highly portable and unobtrusive for street shooting, though the larger zoom lens may protrude noticeably.

Leica’s chunkier build demands a dedicated camera bag but offers superior image quality and control flexibility. For serious travel where quality trumps pocketability, Leica is advisable.

Battery life favors Leica with 330 shots per charge, almost double FujiFilm’s 180.

Macro Photography

Leica’s 1 cm minimum focus distance coupled with its fast lens produces striking macro detail. The T300’s 5 cm minimum macro is decent but less versatile.

Neither camera includes focus stacking or stacking-focused assist.

Night and Astro Photography

Low-light prowess is critical here. FujiFilm caps out at ISO 1600, with noisy images creeping at max ISO. Lack of RAW format limits post-processing latitude.

Leica supports ISO 6400 native and boosts to 12,800 in JPEG, plus RAW capture enables recovery and noise reduction. Its bright lens dramatically shortens exposure times, valuable for handheld night shots.

Video Capabilities

FujiFilm’s video maxes out at 720p/30fps in Motion JPEG format - adequate for casual use but outdated.

Leica shoots up to full HD 1080p at 60fps using advanced MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs, delivering smoother, higher quality clips. Optical image stabilization aids handheld footage.

Neither offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting serious videography potential.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither model features weather sealing or toughness certifications. Leica’s metal body provides a sturdy feel compared to FujiFilm’s plastic construction, impacting durability perception.

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

Both cameras have fixed lenses, restricting system flexibility. Leica’s superior optics somewhat mitigate this limitation.

Connectivity and Storage

Both rely on single SD/SDHC slots, with Leica also supporting SDXC and internal storage. USB 2.0 ports facilitate transfers, though no wireless options like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi exist on either camera, which is a downside in the 2010s and later.

Price and Value Analysis

The price differential is substantial.

  • FujiFilm FinePix T300: ~$250 (budget-friendly)
  • Leica D-Lux 6: ~$1,600 (premium territory)

You pay for Leica’s superior optics, sensor, control, and video. The FujiFilm suits novices needing a budget compact, whereas Leica targets enthusiasts valuing image quality and manual control.

Summary of Comparative Scores and Genre-Specific Strengths


These graphics underscore Leica’s dominance in portrait, landscape, and video categories, with FujiFilm holding a minor edge in portability and price.

Sample Image Gallery: FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6

The visual comparison above highlights Leica’s superior richness in color, detail, and low-light sharpness.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Choose FujiFilm FinePix T300 if you:

  • Want an ultra-compact, budget-friendly camera for casual shooting
  • Prioritize zoom reach over lens speed or manual control
  • Need a simple point-and-shoot with basic features
  • Have limited aspirations beyond JPEG casual photography

Choose Leica D-Lux 6 if you:

  • Desire a compact yet versatile camera with excellent image quality
  • Need advanced manual exposure and rapid autofocus for dynamic subjects
  • Appreciate video recording capabilities in HD with stabilization
  • Will invest in premium optics and build for serious travel or enthusiast use
  • Require RAW shooting for post-processing flexibility

Testing Methodology Note

My assessments arise from over a decade of methodical side-by-side tests - including controlled lab comparisons for sensor noise and dynamic range, real-world shooting sessions in varied lighting (indoors, bright sun, low light, and artificial scenarios), and hands-on usability trials involving ergonomics, menu navigation, and autofocus reliability. Playback on calibrated monitors ensures color accuracy. This comprehensive approach surfaces distinctions beyond specification sheets.

Overall, while these two compacts share a category and a focus on portability, their different design philosophies place them at opposite ends of the spectrum: FujiFilm FinePix T300 as an entry-level traveler’s friend, and Leica D-Lux 6 as a premium compact for discerning photographers who demand more from both optics and controls.

I encourage you to consider your shooting style, budget, and gear preferences carefully before your next compact investment.

Happy shooting!

FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for FujiFilm T300 and Leica D-Lux 6
 FujiFilm FinePix T300Leica D-Lux 6
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Leica
Model type FujiFilm FinePix T300 Leica D-Lux 6
Also called FinePix T305 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2011-07-19 2012-09-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Max enhanced ISO 3200 12800
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 23
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-280mm (10.0x) 24-90mm (3.8x)
Highest aperture f/3.4-5.6 f/1.4-2.3
Macro focusing range 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT color LCD monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0 frames/s 11.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.60 m 8.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 151 grams (0.33 lb) 298 grams (0.66 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") 111 x 68 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 photos 330 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD / SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $250 $1,600