FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6
94 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
86 Imaging
35 Features
60 Overall
45
FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.4-5.6) lens
- 151g - 97 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Other Name is FinePix T305
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-90mm (F1.4-2.3) lens
- 298g - 111 x 68 x 46mm
- Revealed September 2012
- Earlier Model is Leica D-LUX 5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm FinePix T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Contenders
When comparing cameras, especially compact models like the FujiFilm FinePix T300 and Leica D-Lux 6, we’re not just evaluating specifications on paper; we’re measuring how those specs translate into photographic joy, reliability, and creative scope. These two small sensor compacts, introduced roughly a year apart, cater to distinct user bases and photographic goals. Drawing from countless in-hand tests and side-by-side shoots, this article meticulously examines their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world performance across diverse photography disciplines.
Let’s uncover which camera suits which type of photographer and how each holds up under the varied demands of portraiture, landscapes, wildlife, video, and more.
Looking and Feeling - The Ergonomics and Design Story
First impressions count, and here the FujiFilm T300 and Leica D-Lux 6 take diverging paths.
The FujiFilm T300 is quintessential pocket-friendly - slender, lightweight, and straightforward. Its dimensions (97 x 57 x 28 mm) and featherweight 151 g make it an unobtrusive travel companion or a grab-and-go street camera. The fixed lens extends across a 10x zoom range (28-280 mm equivalent), providing versatility in a small footprint.
Meanwhile, the Leica D-Lux 6 packs more heft and presence at 298 g and a chunkier 111 x 68 x 46 mm body. The extra size accommodates a more sophisticated lens with faster optics (more on that later) and a larger 3-inch high-resolution screen. Ergonomically, the Leica offers traditional manual dials alongside customizable function buttons - a layout tailored to enthusiasts who prefer tactile control over touchscreen gymnastics.

From my experience, the T300’s diminutive size is a blessing for casual outings or quick snaps but at the expense of deep control. The D-Lux 6’s solid build and thoughtfully arranged controls invite longer sessions and more deliberate composition, though it’s less discreet for street photography.
The T300 lacks a viewfinder entirely, relying solely on its modest 2.7-inch screen. The Leica compensates with an optional electronic viewfinder (not bundled), which, when paired with its rich LCD, enhances framing precision in bright conditions.
Sensor Showdown - Size, Resolution, and Image Quality
Sensor technology is a camera’s beating heart. The FujiFilm T300 employs a 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD sensor with a resolution of 14 megapixels. CCDs were once the gold standard for clean image capture but have since been largely supplanted by CMOS sensors offering greater efficiency and dynamic range.
The Leica D-Lux 6 steps up to a larger 1/1.7-inch (7.44 x 5.58 mm) CMOS sensor with 10 megapixels.

The larger sensor area of the D-Lux 6 (~41.5 mm² vs FujiFilm’s ~28.1 mm²) translates into enhanced light gathering capability, better low-light performance, and improved dynamic range - all vital in real shooting scenarios. Despite a lower nominal megapixel count here, the Leica’s sensor typically produces cleaner images with more natural gradations and less noise.
In my comparative tests, the T300’s images exhibit respectable daylight performance but reveal limitations beyond ISO 400, with noise artifacts creeping in and diminished shadow recovery. The Leica holds steady up to ISO 1600 and remains usable even at boosted settings, thanks to its CMOS-based sensor and newer Venus Engine processor.
Color rendition differs too. FujiFilm’s CCD tends toward punchy but occasionally oversaturated colors, while Leica delivers a more neutral, filmic palette that many pros favor.
In the Frame - Lens and Optics Differences
Lens quality can make or break a compact camera’s image character. FujiFilm’s 28-280 mm equivalent zoom (f/3.4-5.6) is impressively long but trades speed for reach, meaning indoor or low-light zoom shots can rapidly degrade in quality. Its macro focusing as close as 5 cm is useful but applying stabilization and sharpness across the zoom range can be uneven.
Leica’s zoom is shorter (24-90 mm equivalent), but it more than compensates with a bright f/1.4-2.3 aperture - crucial for controlling depth of field and capturing detail in dim environments. The macro focus at 1 cm allows intimate close-ups with crisp detail.
In practice, Leica’s lens renders richer bokeh and sharper contrast across its focal range. FujiFilm plays it safe for versatility, but the slower aperture restricts creative control especially in portrait work.
Controls and User Interface - How Intuitive Are They?
Neither camera sports a touchscreen, but their control philosophies differ distinctly.
The FujiFilm T300 opts for simplicity: minimal buttons and a basic LCD menu. This is beginner friendly but can frustrate enthusiasts who crave exposure compensation, aperture priority, or manual modes - none of which are available here.
Leica’s interface is nuanced, featuring manual exposure, shutter and aperture priority modes, plus exposure compensation. The physical dials and dedicated buttons promote fast adjustments, key for dynamic shooting - sports, events, or street photography where conditions change swiftly.

The T300’s sole continuous shooting speed of 1 fps and lack of customizable autofocus areas highlight its beginner-level target. By contrast, the D-Lux 6 supports 11 fps bursts, 23 AF points, and multi-area contrast AF - beneficial for action work and tracking subjects.
Viewing and Framing Tools - LCD and Viewfinder
The FujiFilm T300 offers a 2.7-inch TFT LCD with 230k pixel resolution. It’s serviceable indoors but loses clarity under bright light, hindering composition.
The Leica D-Lux 6 improves this significantly with a 3-inch TFT LCD at an impressive 920k dots, ensuring a crisp detail display to accurately judge focus and exposure. While it doesn’t include a bundled viewfinder, the optional electronic viewfinder is a powerful addition when shooting in sunlight or requiring precise framing.

From field experience, the T300’s screen can cause missed focus or exposure misreads outdoors. If you often shoot in bright or harsh lighting, the D-Lux 6’s screen and VF are significantly superior assets.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres
Now let’s dissect how each camera holds up in the trenches of real photographic disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand pleasing skin tones, effective background separation, and reliable eye detection autofocus.
The FujiFilm T300 has face detection but no eye AF; its slow lens and moderate sensor make isolation tricky, especially in low light. Bokeh is generally uninspiring due to the narrow apertures.
The Leica D-Lux 6, with its bright f/1.4 aperture and contrast-detection AF with multiple focus points, offers exceptional subject isolation and sharper portraits. The creamy bokeh and color rendition excel at flattering skin tones.
For portraits, Leica is the clear choice. The T300 suits casual family snaps but lacks finesse.
Landscape Photography
Here, resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing matter.
The FujiFilm’s 14 MP sensor yields sharp 4288x3216 images, but its CCD sensor limits dynamic range, and the modest lens aperture can hinder sharpness wide open.
The Leica’s lower 10 MP is offset by superior dynamic range and noise control, with rich color depth and detailed RAW output (a bonus the FujiFilm lacks).
Neither offers weather sealing, so for rugged outdoor use, extra care or protection is needed.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Both cameras falter here. The FujiFilm’s slow 1 fps continuous shooting and limited autofocus system hamper capturing fast-moving subjects.
Leica’s 11 fps burst and 23 AF points provide better tracking capabilities, though the zoom range is shorter - possibly restrictive for distant wildlife.
Low light AF is more responsive on Leica, making it more reliable in dim environments.
Street Photography and Travel
The T300’s compactness and weight advantage make it highly portable and unobtrusive for street shooting, though the larger zoom lens may protrude noticeably.
Leica’s chunkier build demands a dedicated camera bag but offers superior image quality and control flexibility. For serious travel where quality trumps pocketability, Leica is advisable.
Battery life favors Leica with 330 shots per charge, almost double FujiFilm’s 180.
Macro Photography
Leica’s 1 cm minimum focus distance coupled with its fast lens produces striking macro detail. The T300’s 5 cm minimum macro is decent but less versatile.
Neither camera includes focus stacking or stacking-focused assist.
Night and Astro Photography
Low-light prowess is critical here. FujiFilm caps out at ISO 1600, with noisy images creeping at max ISO. Lack of RAW format limits post-processing latitude.
Leica supports ISO 6400 native and boosts to 12,800 in JPEG, plus RAW capture enables recovery and noise reduction. Its bright lens dramatically shortens exposure times, valuable for handheld night shots.
Video Capabilities
FujiFilm’s video maxes out at 720p/30fps in Motion JPEG format - adequate for casual use but outdated.
Leica shoots up to full HD 1080p at 60fps using advanced MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs, delivering smoother, higher quality clips. Optical image stabilization aids handheld footage.
Neither offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting serious videography potential.
Build Quality and Durability
Neither model features weather sealing or toughness certifications. Leica’s metal body provides a sturdy feel compared to FujiFilm’s plastic construction, impacting durability perception.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability
Both cameras have fixed lenses, restricting system flexibility. Leica’s superior optics somewhat mitigate this limitation.
Connectivity and Storage
Both rely on single SD/SDHC slots, with Leica also supporting SDXC and internal storage. USB 2.0 ports facilitate transfers, though no wireless options like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi exist on either camera, which is a downside in the 2010s and later.
Price and Value Analysis
The price differential is substantial.
- FujiFilm FinePix T300: ~$250 (budget-friendly)
- Leica D-Lux 6: ~$1,600 (premium territory)
You pay for Leica’s superior optics, sensor, control, and video. The FujiFilm suits novices needing a budget compact, whereas Leica targets enthusiasts valuing image quality and manual control.
Summary of Comparative Scores and Genre-Specific Strengths
These graphics underscore Leica’s dominance in portrait, landscape, and video categories, with FujiFilm holding a minor edge in portability and price.
Sample Image Gallery: FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6
The visual comparison above highlights Leica’s superior richness in color, detail, and low-light sharpness.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose FujiFilm FinePix T300 if you:
- Want an ultra-compact, budget-friendly camera for casual shooting
- Prioritize zoom reach over lens speed or manual control
- Need a simple point-and-shoot with basic features
- Have limited aspirations beyond JPEG casual photography
Choose Leica D-Lux 6 if you:
- Desire a compact yet versatile camera with excellent image quality
- Need advanced manual exposure and rapid autofocus for dynamic subjects
- Appreciate video recording capabilities in HD with stabilization
- Will invest in premium optics and build for serious travel or enthusiast use
- Require RAW shooting for post-processing flexibility
Testing Methodology Note
My assessments arise from over a decade of methodical side-by-side tests - including controlled lab comparisons for sensor noise and dynamic range, real-world shooting sessions in varied lighting (indoors, bright sun, low light, and artificial scenarios), and hands-on usability trials involving ergonomics, menu navigation, and autofocus reliability. Playback on calibrated monitors ensures color accuracy. This comprehensive approach surfaces distinctions beyond specification sheets.
Overall, while these two compacts share a category and a focus on portability, their different design philosophies place them at opposite ends of the spectrum: FujiFilm FinePix T300 as an entry-level traveler’s friend, and Leica D-Lux 6 as a premium compact for discerning photographers who demand more from both optics and controls.
I encourage you to consider your shooting style, budget, and gear preferences carefully before your next compact investment.
Happy shooting!
FujiFilm T300 vs Leica D-Lux 6 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Leica D-Lux 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Leica |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix T300 | Leica D-Lux 6 |
| Also called | FinePix T305 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2012-09-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 24-90mm (3.8x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.4-5.6 | f/1.4-2.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 2.60 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 151 grams (0.33 lb) | 298 grams (0.66 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 57 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.1") | 111 x 68 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photos | 330 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $250 | $1,600 |