FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
95 Imaging
35 Features
22 Overall
29
Portability
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
FujiFilm Z700EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.9-4.7) lens
- 158g - 98 x 59 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as FinePix Z707EXR
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the FujiFilm Z700EXR versus Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Z700EXR (12MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is fairly close but the Z700EXR (1/2") and TL240 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Z700EXR was unveiled about the same time to the TL240 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the Z700EXR scores versus the TL240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR and Samsung TL240. The full galleries are viewable at FujiFilm Z700EXR Gallery and Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm Z700EXR over the Samsung TL240
| Z700EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the FujiFilm Z700EXR
| TL240 | Z700EXR |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm Z700EXR and Samsung TL240
| Z700EXR | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | January 2010 | Same generation |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3.5" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The FujiFilm Z700EXR provides external dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm Z700EXR versus Samsung TL240 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Z700EXR versus the TL240.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z700EXR and TL240 is 95 and 95 respectively.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic here will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z700EXR and TL240.
To sum up, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Z700EXR with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung TL240 will render more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively.
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR Portrait photography advice
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography advice
focusing manually not possible
no external flash support
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR Street photography factors
Samsung TL240 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides focus by touch
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (158 grams)
image stabilization (Optical)
features focus via touch
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
heavier than competitors (160g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
max fps low (2.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2")
has no phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR Travel photography advice
Samsung TL240 Travel photography advice
provides focus by touch
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (158 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
features focus via touch
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competitors (160g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR Landscape photography info
Samsung TL240 Landscape photography info
lovely big screen (3.5 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
resolution not great (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
lovely big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
lack of manual mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
FujiFilm Z700EXR Vlogging factors
Samsung TL240 Vlogging factors
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (158 grams)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
heavier than competitors (160g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
FujiFilm Z700EXR vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix Z700EXR | Samsung TL240 |
| Alternative name | FinePix Z707EXR | ST5000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-175mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.7 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 9cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.5" | 3.5" |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) | 160 grams (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-45A | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $250 | $171 |