Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110
93 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
![Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR/Fujifilm-F200EXR-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix AW110 front Nikon Coolpix AW110 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-AW110/Nikon-AW110-front.jpg)
92 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.8) lens
- 193g - 110 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced July 2013
- Superseded the Nikon AW100
- Later Model is Nikon AW120
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon AW110, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and AW110 (16MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and AW110 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F200EXR was launched 5 years earlier than the AW110 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the AW110 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR and Nikon Coolpix AW110. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery and Nikon AW110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Nikon AW110
Fujifilm F200EXR | AW110 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon AW110 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
AW110 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2013 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Nikon AW110
Fujifilm F200EXR | AW110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR features outer dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Nikon AW110 has proportions of 110mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm F200EXR versus Nikon AW110 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR vs the AW110.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-AW110-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm F200EXR and AW110 is 93 and 92 respectively.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-AW110-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The visual here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm F200EXR and AW110.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm F200EXR featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Nikon AW110 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm F200EXR is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-AW110-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F200EXR-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-AW110-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Nikon AW110 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix AW110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Nikon Coolpix AW110 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-04-30 | 2013-07-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/3.9-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 110 x 65 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-50 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD / SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $350 | $250 |