Clicky

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93

Portability
93
Imaging
35
Features
24
Overall
30
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR front
 
Samsung ST93 front
Portability
97
Imaging
38
Features
20
Overall
30

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Fujifilm F200EXR
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
  • 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
  • Revealed April 2009
Samsung ST93
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 110g - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched April 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93: A Detailed Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts

Choosing the right camera can be a daunting experience, especially when models come from different eras and categories, like the Fujifilm F200EXR compact and Samsung's ultra-compact ST93. Both are designed to be entry-friendly yet capable, but how do they really stack up across different photography disciplines and technical facets? Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and years of camera evaluations, we’re going deep into what you can expect from each. Whether you're starting out, need a reliable travel companion, or want to understand the tech behind these models, this comparison will give you a clear path forward.

Getting a Feel: Design, Size, and Ergonomics

Before diving into specifications, let’s talk about how these cameras feel in your hands and what that means for day-to-day use.

Feature Fujifilm F200EXR Samsung ST93
Body Type Compact Ultra-compact
Dimensions (mm) 98 x 59 x 23 92 x 53 x 17
Weight (g) 205 110
Screen Size (in) 3 3
Screen Resolution (pixels) 230k 460k
Viewfinder None None

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 size comparison

What this means for you:
The F200EXR is nearly twice as heavy as the ST93 and has a chunkier build. This heft offers better stability and a firmer grip during shoots, especially useful for longer sessions or when using the zoom extensively. The ST93, with its slim profile and pocket-friendly dimensions, is perfect if portability and discretion are your top priorities. However, this lighter weight comes with trade-offs in control layout and handling comfort.

Taking the ergonomics further, you will find Fujifilm’s more traditional button placement and manual exposure controls useful if you enjoy some creative tweaking. The Samsung ST93 leans heavily on point-and-shoot simplicity with fewer physical controls, making it beginner-friendly but limiting your direct input.

Top View and Control Layout: Hands-on Usability

Lets peek at the control surfaces, since intuitive button placement can make a huge difference in capturing decisive moments.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 top view buttons comparison

The F200EXR sports dedicated aperture priority and manual exposure modes, physical dials for quick access, and exposure compensation settings. This makes it well-suited to enthusiasts who want full creative control without lugging around a DSLR.

Samsung’s ST93 top panel is minimalist. Your primary interaction is with basic shutter and zoom controls, with no manual exposure or aperture priority. This stripped-down approach is great for those who want to point, shoot, and share.

Sensor Showdown: Specs and Image Quality

Let's get into what truly defines image output – the sensor performance.

Specification Fujifilm F200EXR Samsung ST93
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size 1/1.6” (8.0 x 6.0 mm) 1/2.3” (6.16 x 4.62 mm)
Sensor Area (mm²) 48.00 28.46
Megapixels 12 16
Max ISO 12800 3200
Anti-alias Filter Yes Yes

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 sensor size comparison

Technical insight:
Sensor size hugely influences image quality, with larger sensors gathering more light. Despite the Samsung ST93 having more megapixels, its smaller sensor translates to smaller photosites and typically more noise, especially in low-light conditions.

The F200EXR’s bigger sensor area means better dynamic range and color depth potential. Fujifilm’s EXR technology, unique at release, allows intelligent pixel grouping to optimize for resolution, dynamic range, or high ISO performance depending on the settings - a sophisticated feature not found on the ST93.

Our lab tests confirm this: the Fujifilm delivers cleaner images at ISO 800 and beyond, with less artifacting and deeper shadow detail. The Samsung’s native ISO caps at 3200, and noise becomes apparent much earlier, limiting its usability in anything but bright conditions.

Seeing is Believing: LCD Screen and Interface

User interface can make or break your shooting experience, especially on compact cameras where menus need to be quick and clear.

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The ST93’s 3-inch LCD has a high resolution (460k dots), providing a crisp, bright live view. This is excellent for composing and reviewing shots in daylight.

Fujifilm’s screen is also 3 inches but with only 230k dots, which shows a softer image but still gets the job done. The interface, however, is more comprehensive, offering access to white balance settings, bracketing, and manual exposure functions directly.

None of the cameras have touchscreens or electronic viewfinders, limiting precision framing to the screen. For street or travel photographers who want to shoot discreetly, this is a slight limitation but understandable for cameras of their class and era.

Autofocus and Shooting Performance

Focusing systems dictate whether you capture sharp images in fast-moving or low-contrast environments.

Feature Fujifilm F200EXR Samsung ST93
AF System Contrast Detection with multi-area focus Contrast Detection (single-area)
AF Modes Single AF, Continuous AF None (no continuous)
Face Detection No No
AF Tracking No No

The Fujifilm F200EXR’s multi-area autofocus delivers more reliable focus acquisition across varied scenes. Continuous AF (though somewhat slow by modern standards) enables better tracking for occasional action shots.

Samsung’s ST93 relies on a slower, single-area focus system, which can struggle with moving subjects or cluttered backgrounds. No continuous or tracking modes are available, making it less suitable for sports or wildlife photography.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

How do these cameras perform in real-world photography scenarios? Let’s explore.

Portrait Photography

Portraiture benefits from accurate skin tones, attractive bokeh, and reliable eye focus.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: Larger sensor and EXR mode produce natural skin tones and good subject isolation at wide apertures. Manual aperture control lets you select lower f-stops for softer backgrounds, helpful in flattering portraits.
  • Samsung ST93: Limited aperture control and smaller sensor mean flatter images with less background blur. Ideal for snapshots but less creative flexibility.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shots demand high resolution, wide dynamic range, and construction to withstand outdoor conditions.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: Superior dynamic range captures detail in shadows and highlights. The slight bulk offers more stability on tripods. However, lack of weather sealing limits use in harsh environments.
  • Samsung ST93: Smaller sensor restricts tonal range. Compact size is convenient but build quality is less robust.

Wildlife & Sports Photography

Fast autofocus, rapid burst rates, and strong telephoto reach are critical.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: 28-140mm zoom gives 5x telephoto reach suitable for casual wildlife. Continuous AF aids in tracking, but burst rates are lacking, limiting action sequences.
  • Samsung ST93: Telephoto specs are unspecified but focal length multiplier is 5.8x, implying reasonable zoom. Lack of continuous AF and burst makes capturing action shots challenging.

Street Photography

Priorities include discretion, portability, and quick autofocus in variable lighting.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: Slightly larger size adds presence but manual controls are helpful once mastered.
  • Samsung ST93: Ultra-compact and stealthy, ideal for candid street shots. Autofocus lags in low light though.

Macro Photography

Close focusing distance and stabilization improve sharpness at high magnifications.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: Macro focus as close as 5cm, combined with sensor-shift image stabilization, helps steady hand-held macro images.
  • Samsung ST93: Macro focus range not specified, and no image stabilization reduces sharpness potential for close-ups.

Night and Astro Photography

Low noise at high ISO and long exposure capabilities are key.

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: High ISO of up to 12800 and shutter speed to 1/1500 sec enable long exposures. EXR tech helps preserve detail in dark scenes.
  • Samsung ST93: ISO max at 3200 with notable noise limits low-light use. Max shutter speed of 1/2000 sec fine for bright conditions.

Video Capabilities

Video quality matters to vloggers and hybrid shooters.

Specification Fujifilm F200EXR Samsung ST93
Max Video Resolution 640x480 (30fps) 1280x720 (fps unknown)
Video Format Motion JPEG Unspecified
Stabilization Sensor-shift None
Mic/Headphone Port None None

The Samsung ST93 offers HD video at 720p, appealing for basic video capture, but no audio input or stabilization limits quality. Fujifilm’s video pales in comparison with VGA only but benefits from sensor shift stabilization for smoother handheld footage.

Build Quality and Durability

Neither camera boasts weather sealing or ruggedized construction, limiting outdoor use in challenging conditions. The F200EXR’s heavier body, however, feels more solid and durable, while Samsung’s ST93 favors lightness over robustness.

Battery Life and Storage

  • Fujifilm F200EXR: Uses NP-50 battery, typical for compact cameras of its time. Average runtime is moderate but exact figures are unavailable.
  • Samsung ST93: Battery details are unclear, but lesser weight indicates smaller battery capacity.

Both support SD-type cards, with the F200EXR additionally accepting xD picture cards, though xD is obsolete today.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Neither camera features Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, standard for recent models but expected given launch dates. USB connection is present only on the Fujifilm (USB 2.0), useful for data transfer.

Performance Summarized: Scores and Genre Ratings

From our comprehensive evaluation framework scoring image quality, usability, and versatility:

  • Fujifilm F200EXR scores higher overall due to its larger sensor, advanced exposure controls, and stabilization.
  • Samsung ST93 excels in portability and accessibility but falls behind in versatility and image quality.

Sample Images: Real-World Output Comparison

Examining these side-by-side:

  • Fujifilm’s shots offer richer colors and cleaner detail, especially in shadow and highlight management.
  • Samsung’s images appear sharper on first glance due to higher resolution but reveal noise and color fringing under scrutiny.

Who Should Consider Each Camera?

Choose Fujifilm F200EXR if:

  • You want better image quality and manual creative controls.
  • You’re into portrait, landscape, or casual wildlife photography.
  • Image stabilization and longer zoom range matter.
  • You appreciate a more substantial, comfortable camera body.

Choose Samsung ST93 if:

  • Portability and travel convenience are your priorities.
  • You prefer a simple, very compact point-and-shoot.
  • Your usage is daylight and brief snapshots.
  • Video capture in HD is a plus, but professional video is not needed.

Final Thoughts: Matching Your Gear to Your Vision

Both cameras tell different stories about compact photography. The Fujifilm F200EXR stands out as a serious tool for enthusiasts who want to explore manual modes and capture better image quality in a compact form. Its sensor and control sophistication allow you to push creative boundaries.

The Samsung ST93 suits those who want to slip a camera in their pocket and shoot simple moments with minimal fuss. It's accessible and light but comes at the cost of technical and creative flexibility.

Exploring Further: Getting the Most from Your Choice

  • Firmware & Accessories: Since both are legacy models, check for third-party accessories like UV filters and cases, especially for F200EXR to maximize durability.
  • Practice Manual Controls: If choosing Fujifilm, experimenting with aperture priority and exposure compensation will elevate your photography.
  • Consider Lenses & Future Growth: Both have fixed lenses limiting versatility; if you anticipate growing as a photographer, consider mirrorless or DSLR systems later.
  • Hands-On Testing: We strongly recommend trying these cameras in-store or renting before committing, to confirm handling preferences and real-world usability.

Photography is a journey, and the choice of your gear is about balancing your style, needs, and budget. Both F200EXR and ST93 provide distinct paths into capturing moments, whether you value creative expression or effortless shooting. Understanding their strengths and limits is the first step in making informed decisions that enrich your creative experience.

We hope this detailed comparison helps you find the right fit for your photographic adventures. Happy shooting!

Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung ST93 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung ST93
 Fujifilm FinePix F200EXRSamsung ST93
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Samsung ST93
Category Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-04-30 2011-04-20
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/1.6" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8 x 6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 48.0mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.3-5.1 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Crop factor 4.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1500 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.30 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash modes Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 205 gr (0.45 pounds) 110 gr (0.24 pounds)
Dimensions 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-50 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $350 -