Comparing compact superzooms from 2012: Fujifilm F660EXR versus Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20

When sifting through the world of small sensor superzoom cameras, especially models released around the early 2010s, the Fujifilm FinePix F660EXR and Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 stand out for their ambitious zoom ranges and feature sets in relatively compact bodies. Both cameras targeted enthusiast consumers seeking a versatile travel camera with long reach, manual controls, and decent image quality without the bulk or expense of interchangeable-lens systems.

Having spent considerable time with each model - putting them through typical shooting scenarios in landscape, wildlife, street, and casual macro photography - I’m delving deep to dissect their features and real-world performance, so you can decide which model fits your needs.

First impressions: Size, handling, and ergonomics

Before we jump into pixel-level evaluations and autofocus algorithms, the handling experience often shapes the first impression and long-term enjoyment.

The Fujifilm F660EXR is a notably compact unit, befitting its “compact” category, with dimensions of 104 x 59 x 33 mm and a weight of just 217 grams. The slim profile makes it easy to slip into jackets or small bags, catering to discretion and portability - important for street and travel photography.

Conversely, the Panasonic Lumix LZ20 leans towards a bridge-camera style, resembling a miniature DSLR with a larger handgrip and a beefier body measuring 120 x 76 x 80 mm and weighing in at a substantial 499 grams - over twice the weight of the Fuji. This solid heft can be a bonus if you prefer a camera that feels substantial and stable in hand but is definitely less pocketable.

The ergonomics reflect their sizes: the Fuji’s controls are more minimalistic and somewhat cramped given its compact frame, whereas the Panasonic offers a more comfortable grip for extended handheld shooting, particularly at telephoto lengths where stability matters. The LZ20’s larger size accommodates a more DSLR-like layout with a modest thumb rest and easily reachable buttons.

For users prioritizing compactness and portability on casual trips or street shooting, the Fujifilm feels more at home. For those who prefer an all-day companion with stronger in-hand presence, the Panasonic wins.

Design nuances: Control layout and usability

Operating a camera efficiently is often about how intuitive and well-organized the controls are. To assess this, I compared the top view of both cameras.

The Fujifilm F660EXR offers a straightforward top deck with dedicated dials for exposure compensation and shooting modes, as well as a zoom toggle and shutter button. While the control array is tight due to the compact body, Fuji surprisingly incorporates a decent set of manual exposure modes (including aperture and shutter priority). However, lacking a top LCD or status display means relying on the rear screen for settings info - which can slow down quick adjustments.

The Panasonic LZ20, on the other hand, presents a more DSLR-like control philosophy with more prominent mode dial and buttons. Having manual exposure controls (albeit not full shutter/aperture priority) is balanced by an intuitive arrangement that feels inviting for new users transitioning from simpler point-and-shoots or entry-level DSLRs.

Neither camera offers touchscreen interfaces - not surprising for 2012 models - but the button placement on the Panasonic is decidedly more beginner-friendly and accessible when shooting in rapid succession.

Sensor technology and image quality fundamentals

From a technical standpoint, both cameras employ 16MP small sensors, but with notable differences that shape their image quality alone.

The Fujifilm F660EXR features a 1/2-inch Exmor CMOS sensor produced by Fuji, marketed with their proprietary EXR tech designed to optimize image capture based on scene conditions - whether opting for improved dynamic range, higher sensitivity, or resolution. The sensor measures 6.4 x 4.8 mm, covering roughly 30.7 mm².

Meanwhile, the Panasonic LZ20 utilizes a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm, about 27.7 mm²). CCD technology was more common in compact cameras before CMOS takeover, known for pleasant color rendition but often noisier at high ISO and with slower readout speeds.

From test charts and field shots, the Fuji’s CMOS sensor provides better control over noise, especially beyond ISO 800, and an advantage in dynamic range. The EXR system intelligently balances highlight and shadow detail - particularly valuable in bright outdoor scenes like landscapes or cityscapes during golden hour.

The Panasonic’s CCD sensor produces fairly sharp images at base ISO 100-200 but struggles with noise and detail loss when boosted. Its JPEG processing tends toward punchy colors but can exhibit more chromatic noise in dimmer environments. The CCD’s readout speed also limits continuous shooting rates and live view responsiveness.

Overall, the Fujifilm’s sensor technology aligns better with modern demands for low-light and dynamic range performance, while the Panasonic remains capable under optimal lighting.

LCD screens and interface responsiveness

For composing shots and reviewing images, the rear LCD plays a crucial role - particularly since neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder.

Both models carry a 3-inch TFT LCD with similar resolutions (~460k dots), sufficient for framing and basic menu navigation. However, the feel and visibility differ.

The F660EXR’s screen presents slightly richer contrast and better outdoor visibility when angled correctly, thanks to its coating. The fixed nature of the screen means you’re stuck with whatever angle you shoot from, making certain low or high-angle shots more challenging.

The Panasonic LZ20’s LCD is bright but reflects more in direct sunlight, somewhat hampering clarity outdoors. Its larger body also makes positioning the screen less flexible in tight spots.

Neither camera offers touchscreen functionality or articulated display options, limiting compositional creativity slightly compared to newer superzooms. The menu systems on both are straightforward but lack the snappy responsiveness we expect from modern interfaces; delays of half a second in control response are common.

Evaluating zoom lenses and optical performance

The star feature here is zoom specification.

• Fujifilm F660EXR: 24–360 mm equivalent (15x zoom), aperture f/3.5–5.3
• Panasonic LZ20: 25–525 mm equivalent (21x zoom), aperture f/3.1–5.8

The Panasonic easily out-zooms the Fuji by a sizable margin, extending reach to 525 mm. This makes the LZ20 particularly enticing for wildlife or sports shooters on a tight budget who need that extra reach for distant subjects.

However, maximum aperture at the telephoto end is slightly brighter on the Panasonic (f/5.8 vs. f/5.3), which could help marginally in low light.

Optical quality tends to trade off with zoom range. The Fuji’s lens has less compression artifacts and better resolving power at the wide and mid-zooms, with less obvious distortion. The Panasonic's extreme telephoto end delivers reach but introduces more softness and chromatic aberration noticeable when pixel peeping.

The Fuji’s closer minimum macro focus distance of 5 cm allows for decent close-up shots, while the Panasonic’s 2 cm macro is more ambitious - fingers crossed the image quality holds up.

Autofocus capabilities and speed in real-world use

Autofocus systems are critical to any camera's usability, especially if you shoot fast-moving subjects or in unpredictable lighting.

Both cameras rely solely on contrast-detection autofocus systems without phase-detection points, which is typical for their class and era.

The Fuji offers face detection and eye detection, enhancing portrait and casual shooting ease. Continuous autofocus and tracking functions work reasonably well, and it supports multiple AF area selections. Focus lock accuracy and speed at moderate lighting were generally satisfactory.

The Panasonic also has face detection but lacks eye detection or more refined AF modes. It offers 9 focus points, more than the Fuji’s vague unspecified number, potentially aiding focus in off-center compositions.

In practice, the Fuji’s contrast-based AF feels a touch quicker and more consistent in continuous tracking scenarios, such as when photographing a playful dog or moving vehicles. The Panasonic performs adequately for stationary subjects but struggles with rapid re-acquisition at telephoto zoom.

Shooting speed and burst performance

Continuous shooting rates can influence candid capture quality, especially for sports and wildlife.

• Fujifilm F660EXR claims 11 frames per second (fps), though this is likely with focus and exposure locked on the first frame, and at reduced resolution or JPEG mode.

• Panasonic LZ20 offers 1 fps burst, which is quite sluggish, restricting action photography potential.

On the ground, the Fuji’s burst mode comes in handy for capturing sequences of fast moments like athlete jumps or children playing. Buffer limitations cap extended high-speed bursts, but initial responsiveness is noticeably superior.

Battery life and storage considerations

If you plan to shoot a full-day trip or vacation, battery endurance and storage options become crucial.

The Fuji operates off an NP-50A battery pack, rated for approximately 300 shots per charge. The compact battery size contributes to the camera’s lightweight form.

The Panasonic uses a proprietary battery, unspecified model but rated around 380 shots per charge - a modest advantage in longevity.

Storage-wise, both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with Panasonic additionally offering internal memory - albeit limited. This can be handy for emergency shots if you forget or run out of card space.

Video quality and features in everyday shooting

By 2012, basic video recording was a standard feature even on supersimple compacts.

The Fujifilm F660EXR records Full HD 1920 x 1080 at 30 fps using MPEG-4 H.264 compression, providing better video detail relative to competitors in the segment. The camera includes built-in stereo microphones, though lacks external audio input.

The Panasonic LZ20 tops out at 1280 x 720 HD (720p) video at 30 fps with Motion JPEG format, which results in larger file sizes and slightly inferior quality compared to H.264.

Neither offers 4K, slow motion, nor advanced video features expected today. Optical or sensor-shift stabilization helps smooth handheld footage on both, but the Fuji’s sensor-shift IS is marginally more effective.

Durability and build quality

Neither device claims environmental sealing, waterproofing, or enhanced toughness. Both have plastic bodies, though the Panasonic’s size and weight lend a feeling of more solid construction.

The Fujifilm’s compact exoskeleton feels less robust, requiring cautious handling over time. Neither are designed for professional rugged outdoor use, but the LZ20’s heft can absorb slight bumps better.

Lens ecosystems and expandability

Both cameras sport fixed lenses, so no lens interchangeability is possible. This limits long-term upgrade paths.

For enthusiasts seeking broader creative control and future-proofing, these models represent low commitment entry points or casual secondary cameras rather than primary workhorses.

Connectivity and modern relevance

Connectivity is minimal on both.

The Fuji includes GPS for geotagging photos, a feature absent in the Panasonic, useful for travel photographers tracking locations. Neither has Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - a given for 2012 cameras but a notable shortcoming by today’s standards.

USB 2.0 and (only Fujifilm offers) HDMI output enable basic tethering or video playback but lack fast data transfer options.

Real-world image gallery samples

So how do these specs translate into tangible image output?

Fujifilm F660EXR screen back Panasonic LZ20 front Panasonic LZ20 screen back

Portrait shots on the Fujifilm reveal smoother, more natural skin tones with pleasant background blur at telephoto focal lengths, thanks to its larger sensor and better noise control.

Landscape images demonstrate the Fuji's dynamic range advantages, retaining details in shadows and highlights that appear clipped in Panasonic files.

Wildlife shots are a toss-up: Panasonic’s longer zoom helps frame distant animals better but with softer detail; Fuji nails sharpness but requires being closer.

Street photos benefit from Fuji’s compactness and faster autofocus; the Panasonic’s bulk makes it less discreet.

Performance summary and scoring

Based on extensive testing across varied scenarios, here are the overall performance ratings:

Fujifilm F660EXR scores higher for sensor quality, burst speed, manual control, video specs, and portability.

Panasonic LZ20 edges Fujifilm in zoom range and battery life but loses ground on autofocus, size, and video.

Photography discipline suitability chart

Breaking down strengths for specific usage areas:

• Portraits: Fuji excels due to skin tone rendering and eye detection
• Landscape: Fuji leads on dynamic range and resolution
• Wildlife: Panasonic’s telephoto reach helps despite image softness
• Sports: Fuji’s burst speed and AF perform better
• Street: Fuji’s compact size and quiet operation win
• Macro: Panasonic’s closer focusing distance is an advantage
• Night/Astro: Fuji’s higher ISO and sensor tech pull ahead
• Video: Fuji’s 1080p and H.264 compression superior
• Travel: Fuji’s GPS, size, and weight better suited
• Professional work: Neither ideal for professional demands, yet Fuji’s controls slightly preferable

Final verdict and buying advice

Both models reflect their 2012 origin, blending affordable superzoom versatility with compromises inherent to their class and era.

If travel-friendly, lightweight handling, better low-light performance, and video recording are priorities, the Fujifilm FinePix F660EXR emerges as the smarter choice. It’s the better all-rounder for enthusiasts chasing image quality in a pocketable shell.

If extreme telephoto zoom reach and longer battery life top your wish list - and you don’t mind bulk or slower shooting - the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LZ20 is worth considering. Its zoom can be a game-changer for casual wildlife snapping or distant subjects on a budget.

Between these two, there is no clear overall champion; rather context governs the decision. For street and everyday snapshots, lean Fuji. For occasional zoo visits or backyard birding, Panasonic may stretch your frame.

Closing thoughts

In my years testing gear, cameras like these serve as valuable stepping stones for photographers not yet ready to commit to mirrorless or DSLR systems. They democratize long-reach photography while enforcing simplicity and affordability.

If you were to buy one today - which, let’s be honest, doesn’t make sense given modern mirrorless advancements - they’d still offer a nostalgic glimpse into early-2010s superzoom development.

For those drawn towards these models or similar cameras, my advice would be to focus on what matters most: do you want reach, portability, or overall image fidelity? Answering this will guide you to the right pick.

In this comparison of the Fujifilm F660EXR vs Panasonic LZ20, the key takeaway is balance of size, zoom length, and sensor tech - not just specs on paper. And as always, your shooting habits and visual priorities remain the ultimate compass.

Happy shooting!