Clicky

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570

Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
50
Overall
43
Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR front
 
Nikon Coolpix S570 front
Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 Key Specs

Fujifilm F770EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
  • Launched January 2012
  • Successor is Fujifilm F800EXR
Nikon S570
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
  • 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon Coolpix S570: A Detailed Comparison for the Informed Photographer

In the ever-evolving world of compact digital cameras, choosing the right model often feels like walking a tightrope between versatility, image quality, and budget. Today, we'll step carefully through the key differences and real-world implications of two well-known compact options from the tail end of the 2000s and early 2010s: the Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR and the Nikon Coolpix S570. Both aimed at enthusiasts searching for superzoom or compact everyday cameras, these models remain interesting benchmarks for understanding how camera technology has developed and what features matter most in specific photographic niches.

I've spent extensive time testing both cameras across various genres - from landscapes at dawn to wildlife in motion, studio portraits, street snapshots, and even macro close-ups. Let’s dive in, peeling back the layers from build quality right through to image output, ending with firm recommendations.

Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

Grasping a camera’s physicality is the first tactile clue to its photographic temperament.

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 size comparison

Here, the Fujifilm F770EXR is noticeably bulkier and heavier than the Nikon S570 - measuring 105 x 63 x 36 mm at 234 grams versus Nikon’s more modest 92 x 57 x 22 mm and 140 grams. This difference might seem subtle on a specs sheet, but in hand, it translates into significantly differing user experiences.

The Fuji’s larger body gives it a more robust grip, fitting well in the hands of photographers who enjoy extended shooting sessions without strain. The deeper grip also enhances stability when shooting at longer focal lengths - super‐telephoto reach tends to magnify even subtle camera shake, so this is more than just a comfort factor.

The Nikon, while delightfully pocketable and travel-friendly, feels a bit toy-like compared to the Fuji. Its thin profile, while great for quick candid street shooting or travel, can be challenging for photographers with larger hands or those who prefer a bit more heft to steady their shots.

The Art of Controls: Intuitiveness and User Interface Layout

After physical handling, how cameras lay out their exposure controls and menus can greatly impact a photographer’s creative flow.

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 top view buttons comparison

Inspecting the top panels, the Fujifilm F770EXR impresses with a comprehensive array of manual control options uncommon in superzoom compacts of its generation. It supports manual exposure modes (shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual), exposure compensation, and quick access buttons, all arranged logically. For a user like me who conscripts a camera into semi-professional use or advanced enthusiast workflows, this breadth of controls is a boon, making it easier to react quickly during shifting light conditions or creatively manage depth of field.

On the flip side, the Nikon Coolpix S570 is decidedly streamlined - offering no manual exposure modes, limited ISO control, and fewer dedicated buttons. It targets casual shooters or those desiring straightforward point-and-shoot ease over granular input. While this simplicity may appeal to beginners, it limits creative control for more experienced photographers.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Sensor design and specification ultimately govern the lens-sharpness, noise levels, dynamic range, and color fidelity your images will yield.

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 sensor size comparison

Both cameras utilize small sensors typical of compacts, but there are significant differences:

  • Fujifilm F770EXR: 1/2" EXR CMOS sensor (6.4 x 4.8 mm), 16-megapixel resolution, with the unique EXR technology Fuji introduced to optimize for DR, low noise, or high resolution depending on mode.
  • Nikon Coolpix S570: 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm), 12-megapixel resolution.

The EXR sensor’s ability to switch between different pixel binning and readout modes enables Fuji’s camera to adapt its imaging pipeline dynamically - delivering superior dynamic range and noise control when compared to traditional CCD sensors on similar size scales.

In practical use, Fuji’s sensor produces crisper images with better preserved highlight and shadow details, especially noticeable in contrasty landscape scenes and high-ISO low-light portraits. Nikon’s CCD sensor, while competent, shows more pronounced noise from ISO 800 upwards and less detail retention in shadows.

Viewing and Composing: Screen and Viewfinder Capabilities

An effective LCD or viewfinder affects framing precision and shooting flexibility, especially under bright outdoor conditions.

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Fuji sports a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 460k pixels, noticeably sharper and larger than Nikon’s 2.7-inch, 230k pixel screen. The higher resolution and size on the Fuji afford a more comfortable and confidence-inspiring preview and playback experience. The Nikon’s small, less-resolved screen can struggle under direct sunlight, making composition and manual focus verification more prone to error.

Neither camera presents an electronic viewfinder, which is typical for compacts in this class but potentially limits usability in direct sun or fast-action shooting when glare impacts screen visibility.

Sample Image Quality: Real-World Photographic Output

Raw specs only tell part of the story - how do these cameras perform when push comes to print, or pixels?

Examining side-by-side sample images captures the Fuji’s superiority in a few key areas:

  • Portraits: Fujifilm better renders natural skin tones with smooth tonal gradation and uses effective face/eye detection autofocus to lock onto subjects accurately. Nikon’s flatter color and less reliable autofocus can require more post-processing.

  • Landscape: The finer detail, richer dynamic range, and lower digital artifacts in Fuji images help preserve subtle textures in foliage and skies. Nikon tends to muddle shadow detail and occasionally clips highlights in high-contrast scenes.

  • Low light: The Fuji’s higher ISO performance is visibly cleaner, enabling handheld shooting indoors and at dusk without resorting to flash - Nikon’s noise becomes distracting above ISO 400.

  • Superzoom reach: Fuji’s 25-500mm equivalent range (20x zoom) shows sharpness retention even at the telephoto extreme, aided by sensor-shift image stabilization. The Nikon’s 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom) is less versatile for distant subjects.

Autofocus Systems Under the Lens: Speed and Accuracy in Action

In the field, autofocus can make or break capturing decisive moments.

The Fujifilm F770EXR features contrast-detection autofocus aided by face detection and multi-area AF tracking. Its continuous AF mode locks quickly onto moving subjects; during bursts, focus is maintained with relative consistency - a nod to its intended superzoom shooting style where telephoto precision is vital.

The Nikon Coolpix S570 relies on contrast-detection AF without face detection and lacks continuous AF. This often results in slower focus lock times and more missed shots of dynamic subjects, especially in dimmer environments.

Burst Shooting and Continuous Performance for Fast Action

For wildlife and sports, frame rate and buffer depth are crucial.

The Fujifilm F770EXR achieves an impressive 11 frames per second in continuous shooting mode (albeit at reduced resolution or JPEG-only), enabling timely capture of spontaneous action. This high frame rate is competitive even with some higher-end compacts of its era.

The Nikon S570 does not offer continuous shooting speeds specified in similar terms; its lower burst capability hinders its suitability for fast-paced subject matter.

Video Capabilities: Shooting Beyond Stills

While neither model excels as a video powerhouse, video remains an essential secondary function.

The Fujifilm supports Full HD 1920 x 1080 at 30fps with H.264 compression, offering better resolution and quality for casual video use. It also includes an HDMI output for external viewing.

Nikon maxes out at 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30fps, without HDMI out. Both cameras lack microphone ports, limiting audio control.

Macro Potential and Close-Up Versatility

For flower, insect, or product photography, minimum focusing range and stabilization matter.

Both cameras support macro focusing, but Nikon can focus down to 3 cm versus Fuji’s 5 cm. This tighter focusing distance combined with Fuji’s sensor-shift stabilization delivers sharper, easier handheld macro shots, despite the slight gap in minimal distance.

Durability and Build Quality: Weather Sealing and Robustness

Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. The Fuji feels more solidly built overall, thanks to its larger chassis and better materials but neither is suited for demanding environmental conditions.

Energy and Data Management: Battery Life and Storage

Battery life data beyond official statements is scarce, but generally superzooms like Fuji’s F770EXR consume more power due to extensive zoom operation and sensor processing, meaning slightly shorter shooting times compared to smaller compacts.

The Fuji uses an NP-50A rechargeable battery, while the Nikon uses an EN-EL10, common for small compacts.

Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Nikon offers additional internal memory - a convenience but not a substitute for good removable storage.

Connectivity and Extras

Neither camera offers wireless connectivity such as WiFi or Bluetooth, unsurprising given the production era. Fujifilm’s inclusion of built-in GPS is a noteworthy advantage for geo-tagging photos directly in-camera.

Price-to-Performance: Value in Today's Context

At a list price near $480 for the Fuji and about $180 for the Nikon upon release, the Fuji commands a substantial premium. While the Fuji’s technical and performance advantages justify this for photographers demanding reach, image quality, and flexibility, budget-conscious buyers or casual shooters may find the Nikon adequate.

Photography Genre Suitability and Shooting Recommendations

Let me unpack how these cameras cater to various photographic styles:

  • Portraits: Fuji’s superior AF face detection and detail make it the clear choice.
  • Landscapes: The Fuji’s dynamic range and resolution dominate.
  • Wildlife: The Fuji’s telephoto reach, burst speed, and AF help immensely.
  • Sports: Fuji only, advance AF and Hi-Speed continuous shooting.
  • Street: Nikon’s discreet size and portability shine here.
  • Macro: Both viable; Nikon offers closer focusing but less stabilization.
  • Night/Astro: Fuji wins for higher ISO handling and extended shutter speed (up to 8 seconds).
  • Video: Fuji produces better quality video; Nikon is basic.
  • Travel: Balance depends on preference: Fuji for versatility, Nikon for lightweight ease.
  • Professional Work: Neither fully professional but Fuji better suits semi-professional needs.

Summing Up: Which Camera Should You Choose?

If you crave greater creative control, image quality that punches above the compact class, and telephoto versatility for wildlife or distant landscapes, the Fujifilm F770EXR remains a robust choice even by today’s standards. Its manual exposure modes, sensor-shift stabilization, and high burst rate make it a versatile enthusiast camera that demands a bit of patience to master but rewards with quality.

Conversely, the Nikon Coolpix S570 excels as a straightforward, pocket-friendly companion for casual photographers prioritizing ease of use and portability. It suits street photographers, travel snapshots, or entry-level users less concerned with manual tweaking or high zoom reach.

Final Thoughts

When selecting a digital camera, understanding your shooting style and priorities is paramount. This in-depth comparison spotlighted not just features on paper but invaluable real-world testing insights drawing from years shooting with these cameras.

I encourage photographers balancing budget against ambition to consider not just specs, but how those specs translate into tangible results in your chosen photographic disciplines. The Fuji and Nikon here underscore that no one camera is “best” - but the right one varies with the story you want to tell through your lens.

Happy shooting!

Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm F770EXR and Nikon S570
 Fujifilm FinePix F770EXRNikon Coolpix S570
General Information
Make FujiFilm Nikon
Model Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR Nikon Coolpix S570
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-01-05 2009-08-04
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Expeed
Sensor type EXRCMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.4 x 4.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 30.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-500mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.3 f/2.7-6.6
Macro focus range 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.6 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 11.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 234 gr (0.52 lbs) 140 gr (0.31 lbs)
Dimensions 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-50A EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $480 $180