Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570
90 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched January 2012
- Successor is Fujifilm F800EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.7-6.6) lens
- 140g - 92 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon Coolpix S570: A Detailed Comparison for the Informed Photographer
In the ever-evolving world of compact digital cameras, choosing the right model often feels like walking a tightrope between versatility, image quality, and budget. Today, we'll step carefully through the key differences and real-world implications of two well-known compact options from the tail end of the 2000s and early 2010s: the Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR and the Nikon Coolpix S570. Both aimed at enthusiasts searching for superzoom or compact everyday cameras, these models remain interesting benchmarks for understanding how camera technology has developed and what features matter most in specific photographic niches.
I've spent extensive time testing both cameras across various genres - from landscapes at dawn to wildlife in motion, studio portraits, street snapshots, and even macro close-ups. Let’s dive in, peeling back the layers from build quality right through to image output, ending with firm recommendations.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
Grasping a camera’s physicality is the first tactile clue to its photographic temperament.

Here, the Fujifilm F770EXR is noticeably bulkier and heavier than the Nikon S570 - measuring 105 x 63 x 36 mm at 234 grams versus Nikon’s more modest 92 x 57 x 22 mm and 140 grams. This difference might seem subtle on a specs sheet, but in hand, it translates into significantly differing user experiences.
The Fuji’s larger body gives it a more robust grip, fitting well in the hands of photographers who enjoy extended shooting sessions without strain. The deeper grip also enhances stability when shooting at longer focal lengths - super‐telephoto reach tends to magnify even subtle camera shake, so this is more than just a comfort factor.
The Nikon, while delightfully pocketable and travel-friendly, feels a bit toy-like compared to the Fuji. Its thin profile, while great for quick candid street shooting or travel, can be challenging for photographers with larger hands or those who prefer a bit more heft to steady their shots.
The Art of Controls: Intuitiveness and User Interface Layout
After physical handling, how cameras lay out their exposure controls and menus can greatly impact a photographer’s creative flow.

Inspecting the top panels, the Fujifilm F770EXR impresses with a comprehensive array of manual control options uncommon in superzoom compacts of its generation. It supports manual exposure modes (shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual), exposure compensation, and quick access buttons, all arranged logically. For a user like me who conscripts a camera into semi-professional use or advanced enthusiast workflows, this breadth of controls is a boon, making it easier to react quickly during shifting light conditions or creatively manage depth of field.
On the flip side, the Nikon Coolpix S570 is decidedly streamlined - offering no manual exposure modes, limited ISO control, and fewer dedicated buttons. It targets casual shooters or those desiring straightforward point-and-shoot ease over granular input. While this simplicity may appeal to beginners, it limits creative control for more experienced photographers.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor design and specification ultimately govern the lens-sharpness, noise levels, dynamic range, and color fidelity your images will yield.

Both cameras utilize small sensors typical of compacts, but there are significant differences:
- Fujifilm F770EXR: 1/2" EXR CMOS sensor (6.4 x 4.8 mm), 16-megapixel resolution, with the unique EXR technology Fuji introduced to optimize for DR, low noise, or high resolution depending on mode.
- Nikon Coolpix S570: 1/2.3" CCD sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm), 12-megapixel resolution.
The EXR sensor’s ability to switch between different pixel binning and readout modes enables Fuji’s camera to adapt its imaging pipeline dynamically - delivering superior dynamic range and noise control when compared to traditional CCD sensors on similar size scales.
In practical use, Fuji’s sensor produces crisper images with better preserved highlight and shadow details, especially noticeable in contrasty landscape scenes and high-ISO low-light portraits. Nikon’s CCD sensor, while competent, shows more pronounced noise from ISO 800 upwards and less detail retention in shadows.
Viewing and Composing: Screen and Viewfinder Capabilities
An effective LCD or viewfinder affects framing precision and shooting flexibility, especially under bright outdoor conditions.

The Fuji sports a 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 460k pixels, noticeably sharper and larger than Nikon’s 2.7-inch, 230k pixel screen. The higher resolution and size on the Fuji afford a more comfortable and confidence-inspiring preview and playback experience. The Nikon’s small, less-resolved screen can struggle under direct sunlight, making composition and manual focus verification more prone to error.
Neither camera presents an electronic viewfinder, which is typical for compacts in this class but potentially limits usability in direct sun or fast-action shooting when glare impacts screen visibility.
Sample Image Quality: Real-World Photographic Output
Raw specs only tell part of the story - how do these cameras perform when push comes to print, or pixels?
Examining side-by-side sample images captures the Fuji’s superiority in a few key areas:
-
Portraits: Fujifilm better renders natural skin tones with smooth tonal gradation and uses effective face/eye detection autofocus to lock onto subjects accurately. Nikon’s flatter color and less reliable autofocus can require more post-processing.
-
Landscape: The finer detail, richer dynamic range, and lower digital artifacts in Fuji images help preserve subtle textures in foliage and skies. Nikon tends to muddle shadow detail and occasionally clips highlights in high-contrast scenes.
-
Low light: The Fuji’s higher ISO performance is visibly cleaner, enabling handheld shooting indoors and at dusk without resorting to flash - Nikon’s noise becomes distracting above ISO 400.
-
Superzoom reach: Fuji’s 25-500mm equivalent range (20x zoom) shows sharpness retention even at the telephoto extreme, aided by sensor-shift image stabilization. The Nikon’s 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom) is less versatile for distant subjects.
Autofocus Systems Under the Lens: Speed and Accuracy in Action
In the field, autofocus can make or break capturing decisive moments.
The Fujifilm F770EXR features contrast-detection autofocus aided by face detection and multi-area AF tracking. Its continuous AF mode locks quickly onto moving subjects; during bursts, focus is maintained with relative consistency - a nod to its intended superzoom shooting style where telephoto precision is vital.
The Nikon Coolpix S570 relies on contrast-detection AF without face detection and lacks continuous AF. This often results in slower focus lock times and more missed shots of dynamic subjects, especially in dimmer environments.
Burst Shooting and Continuous Performance for Fast Action
For wildlife and sports, frame rate and buffer depth are crucial.
The Fujifilm F770EXR achieves an impressive 11 frames per second in continuous shooting mode (albeit at reduced resolution or JPEG-only), enabling timely capture of spontaneous action. This high frame rate is competitive even with some higher-end compacts of its era.
The Nikon S570 does not offer continuous shooting speeds specified in similar terms; its lower burst capability hinders its suitability for fast-paced subject matter.
Video Capabilities: Shooting Beyond Stills
While neither model excels as a video powerhouse, video remains an essential secondary function.
The Fujifilm supports Full HD 1920 x 1080 at 30fps with H.264 compression, offering better resolution and quality for casual video use. It also includes an HDMI output for external viewing.
Nikon maxes out at 1280 x 720 (HD) at 30fps, without HDMI out. Both cameras lack microphone ports, limiting audio control.
Macro Potential and Close-Up Versatility
For flower, insect, or product photography, minimum focusing range and stabilization matter.
Both cameras support macro focusing, but Nikon can focus down to 3 cm versus Fuji’s 5 cm. This tighter focusing distance combined with Fuji’s sensor-shift stabilization delivers sharper, easier handheld macro shots, despite the slight gap in minimal distance.
Durability and Build Quality: Weather Sealing and Robustness
Neither camera offers weather sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, or shock resistance. The Fuji feels more solidly built overall, thanks to its larger chassis and better materials but neither is suited for demanding environmental conditions.
Energy and Data Management: Battery Life and Storage
Battery life data beyond official statements is scarce, but generally superzooms like Fuji’s F770EXR consume more power due to extensive zoom operation and sensor processing, meaning slightly shorter shooting times compared to smaller compacts.
The Fuji uses an NP-50A rechargeable battery, while the Nikon uses an EN-EL10, common for small compacts.
Both accept SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but Nikon offers additional internal memory - a convenience but not a substitute for good removable storage.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera offers wireless connectivity such as WiFi or Bluetooth, unsurprising given the production era. Fujifilm’s inclusion of built-in GPS is a noteworthy advantage for geo-tagging photos directly in-camera.
Price-to-Performance: Value in Today's Context
At a list price near $480 for the Fuji and about $180 for the Nikon upon release, the Fuji commands a substantial premium. While the Fuji’s technical and performance advantages justify this for photographers demanding reach, image quality, and flexibility, budget-conscious buyers or casual shooters may find the Nikon adequate.
Photography Genre Suitability and Shooting Recommendations
Let me unpack how these cameras cater to various photographic styles:
- Portraits: Fuji’s superior AF face detection and detail make it the clear choice.
- Landscapes: The Fuji’s dynamic range and resolution dominate.
- Wildlife: The Fuji’s telephoto reach, burst speed, and AF help immensely.
- Sports: Fuji only, advance AF and Hi-Speed continuous shooting.
- Street: Nikon’s discreet size and portability shine here.
- Macro: Both viable; Nikon offers closer focusing but less stabilization.
- Night/Astro: Fuji wins for higher ISO handling and extended shutter speed (up to 8 seconds).
- Video: Fuji produces better quality video; Nikon is basic.
- Travel: Balance depends on preference: Fuji for versatility, Nikon for lightweight ease.
- Professional Work: Neither fully professional but Fuji better suits semi-professional needs.
Summing Up: Which Camera Should You Choose?
If you crave greater creative control, image quality that punches above the compact class, and telephoto versatility for wildlife or distant landscapes, the Fujifilm F770EXR remains a robust choice even by today’s standards. Its manual exposure modes, sensor-shift stabilization, and high burst rate make it a versatile enthusiast camera that demands a bit of patience to master but rewards with quality.
Conversely, the Nikon Coolpix S570 excels as a straightforward, pocket-friendly companion for casual photographers prioritizing ease of use and portability. It suits street photographers, travel snapshots, or entry-level users less concerned with manual tweaking or high zoom reach.
Final Thoughts
When selecting a digital camera, understanding your shooting style and priorities is paramount. This in-depth comparison spotlighted not just features on paper but invaluable real-world testing insights drawing from years shooting with these cameras.
I encourage photographers balancing budget against ambition to consider not just specs, but how those specs translate into tangible results in your chosen photographic disciplines. The Fuji and Nikon here underscore that no one camera is “best” - but the right one varies with the story you want to tell through your lens.
Happy shooting!
Fujifilm F770EXR vs Nikon S570 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Nikon Coolpix S570 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix F770EXR | Nikon Coolpix S570 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-05 | 2009-08-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXR | Expeed |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.7-6.6 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 234 gr (0.52 lbs) | 140 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 92 x 57 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50A | EN-EL10 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $480 | $180 |