Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
![Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-FinePix-F800EXR/Fujifilm-F800EXR-front.jpg)
![Samsung PL200 front Samsung PL200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-PL200/Samsung-PL200-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Released July 2012
- Replaced the Fujifilm F770EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm F900EXR
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed July 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the Fujifilm F800EXR (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm F800EXR (1/2") and PL200 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm F800EXR was brought out 2 years later than the PL200 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm F800EXR matches up against the PL200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR & Samsung PL200. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm F800EXR Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F800EXR over the Samsung PL200
Fujifilm F800EXR | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Fujifilm F800EXR
PL200 | Fujifilm F800EXR |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F800EXR and Samsung PL200
Fujifilm F800EXR | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm F800EXR offers exterior measurements of 105mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F800EXR and the PL200.
![Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 size comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F800EXR-vs-Samsung-PL200-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F800EXR and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F800EXR-vs-Samsung-PL200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm F800EXR and PL200.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F800EXR because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm F800EXR will offer you extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm F800EXR should have an edge in sensor tech.
![Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F800EXR-vs-Samsung-PL200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-FinePix-F800EXR-vs-Samsung-PL200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm F800EXR vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm FinePix F800EXR | Samsung PL200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | - |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-500mm (20.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 232g (0.51 pounds) | 170g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 41 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 19.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 143 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-50A | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $330 | $0 |