Comparing the Fujifilm F900EXR and Panasonic FZ70: Which Superzoom Compact Delivers for You?

In 2013, compact superzoom cameras were a popular choice for versatile shooting without the weight and hassle of multiple lenses. Two compelling contenders from that era were the Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70. Both promised attractive zoom ranges and a variety of features aimed at travel, wildlife, and everyday photography. Having tested these cameras extensively, I'm excited to unpack how they stack up against one another in real-world shooting and technical performance contexts.

Let's embark on this detailed comparison together - considering ergonomics, image quality, autofocus performance, usability, and how each may suit specific photography disciplines. Whether you're a casual enthusiast or a more serious shooter, I aim to provide transparent insights grounded in hands-on experience.

Holding Them in Your Hands: Design, Size, and Ergonomics

The first impression any camera makes comes from how it feels and looks in the hand. It's where intimacy between photographer and device begins.

At a glance, the Fujifilm F900EXR strikes you immediately as a true compact - small, lightweight, and pocketable. Measuring just 105mm wide, 61mm tall, and 36mm deep, and weighing 232 grams, it is easy to carry around all day without fatigue. Its slim profile is perfect for spontaneous street shooting or travel when bulk is unwelcome.

In contrast, the Panasonic FZ70 is unmistakably a bridge camera with DSLR-inspired ergonomics. At 130mm wide, 97mm tall, and a chunky 118mm depth, it weighs in at a hefty 606 grams - nearly three times that of the Fujifilm. The substantial handgrip and larger rubberized grip area bring a confident grip, especially helpful when wielding its mega 60x zoom. Yet, it's noticeably less pocketable or discreet, which means carrying a dedicated camera bag becomes more or less mandatory.

From a handling viewpoint, your shoot duration and style often dictate weight tolerance. I found the Fujifilm excellent for marathon street sessions, whereas the Panasonic’s robust build lends itself better to more deliberate nature or wildlife shoots where grip security and stability matter.

Looking closer at the control layouts, both lamps feature a fixed rear 3-inch LCD, but Panasonic’s FZ70 houses a dedicated electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 202k dots, something the F900EXR lacks. The EVF is a palpable advantage under bright sun, especially for extended telephoto framing. Fujifilm’s top-deck controls, though minimal, do allow quick adjustments, but the Panasonic’s physical dials, more numerous buttons, and switchable focus modes provide additional tactile feedback and customization.

Overall, ergonomics favor the FZ70 for users prioritizing grip security and manual control access, while the Fujifilm suits those after ultra-portability.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Imaging performance often defines a camera's core value, shaped primarily by sensor size, resolution, and processing.

Both models employ small sensors by interchangeable-lens camera standards but differ subtly. The Fujifilm F900EXR uses a 1/2-inch EXR CMOS sensor with an area of approximately 30.7mm², slightly larger than Panasonic’s 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor at 28.1mm². Both deliver 16MP resolution, producing images up to 4608 x 3456 pixels.

The Fuji’s EXR II processor was state-of-the-art for its time, designed to optimize dynamic range by cleverly switching sensor pixel groupings. This lends the F900EXR an edge in scenes with high contrast, such as bright landscapes with shadowy foregrounds. Panasonic’s Venus Engine is a solid performer with strong noise reduction algorithms but doesn’t use the same pixel-level tricks.

Testing ISO sensitivity, both cameras target a maximum native ISO of 3200, but Fujifilm allows boosting up to ISO 12800, whereas Panasonic tops out at ISO 6400. Practically, the Fujifilm image quality under low light conditions exhibits more noise but retains better color fidelity thanks to higher bit-depth processing.

Antialiasing filters are present on both sensors, slightly sacrificing ultimate sharpness to reduce moiré - a common trade-off in compact cameras.

In terms of raw support, both cameras output 12-14 bit RAW files, which enables deeper post-processing flexibility. This is especially invaluable for landscape and portrait photographers who require accurate skin tones or wide tonal ranges.

Overall, while small sensors limit ultimate image quality compared to APS-C or full-frame, the Fujifilm’s sensor and processor combination often results in better dynamic range rendition and color depth in real-world shooting. Panasonic offers strong, consistent results with well-balanced sharpness and noise-control, but with less latitude for extensive edits.

Autofocus Systems and Focusing Performance: Speed Meets Accuracy

Autofocus (AF) performance is critical across most photography styles, from critical wildlife and sports action to casual family portraits.

The Fujifilm F900EXR adopts a hybrid autofocus system combining contrast and phase-detection methods, which is relatively advanced for a compact. It supports face detection and continuous AF modes, and offers decent tracking of moving subjects. However, it lacks designated AF point count data, suggesting a modest focus area selection.

Panasonic’s FZ70, on the other hand, uses a contrast-detection AF system with 23 focus points, including center-weighted metering and face detection. While contrast detection tends to be slower than phase detection, especially under low light, the large number of AF points provides good framing flexibility.

In real-world tests, the Fujifilm performs quick, snappy autofocus in well-lit conditions and early-instant focus acquisition under challenging backlit scenarios. It also handles continuous AF for tracking walking subjects reasonably well in burst shooting mode at 11fps.

The Panasonic’s autofocus is a bit slower to lock, particularly at full zoom or in dim lighting, though its extensive zoom range somewhat compensates by enabling framing from a distance. Continuous AF tracking on moving subjects, such as erratic birds or runners, can feel less fluid, occasionally missing focus briefly.

Manual focus capability is available only on the Panasonic FZ70, which is useful for macro or selective focus applications. The Fujifilm does not allow manual focus, which limits control for certain creative fields.

Zoom Range and Lens Characteristics: Getting Close to the Action

Superzoom cameras live or die by their lens versatility and quality across focal lengths.

The Fujifilm F900EXR offers an impressive 20x zoom, covering an equivalent range of 25-500mm with an aperture varying from f/3.5 at wide end to f/5.3 at telephoto. Its minimum focusing distance of 5cm is decent but not outstanding for close-up or macro shots.

The Panasonic FZ70 boasts an awe-inspiring 60x zoom range (20-1200mm equivalent). Its lens starts brighter at f/2.8 wide-angle but narrows to f/5.9 fully zoomed in. For practical purposes, this extensive zoom enables capturing distant wildlife or sports action without bulk, but image quality can degrade slightly at the extreme telephoto end due to lens design trade-offs.

Both lenses feature optical image stabilization, with Fujifilm using sensor-shift and Panasonic employing optical stabilization in the lens itself. When shooting handheld at long focal lengths, the Panasonic's stabilization performs admirably, counteracting natural shake better due to the larger size and longer focal reach.

The Panasonic’s macro focusing range is outstanding, able to focus as close as 1cm - perfect for flower or insect photography. The Fujifilm’s 5cm minimum focusing range is sufficient for casual macro but less versatile.

Finally, flash coverage differs too: Fujifilm’s built-in flash has a range up to roughly 3.7 m, while Panasonic’s built-in unit reaches out an impressive 13.5 m, making it more useful for fill light over longer distances.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composition Tools on the Go

Viewing your scene accurately under varying light is crucial, particularly for composition-dependent work like portraits and landscapes.

Both cameras employ 3-inch fixed TFT LCDs, but with markedly different resolutions. Fujifilm’s screen offers 920k dots, delivering crisp, clear image previews and menu visualization. Panasonic’s LCD is less sharp, with only 460k dots, presenting a less detailed display.

Significantly, the Panasonic FZ70 incorporates a built-in electronic viewfinder with 202k dots covering 100% view - perfect for bright sun conditions where LCD screens wash out easily. The Fujifilm F900EXR, lacking any viewfinder, forces reliance on the LCD, which can be limiting outdoors.

While the Fujifilm’s LCD quality wins in detail and color, for photographers preferring eye-level shooting and longer focal lengths, the FZ70’s EVF outperforms the Fuji’s screen-only setup.

Burst Shooting and Video Capabilities: Capturing Movement and Motion

Continuous shooting and video functionalities determine which camera better suits active, multimedia-driven shooters.

The Fujifilm F900EXR offers a fast burst rate of 11 frames per second, a notable figure for a compact from 2013. This speed can be valuable for capturing fleeting facial expressions or sporting moments. The Panasonic’s FZ70 provides a respectable 9 fps, still competitive but slightly behind.

Both cameras support full HD video recording at 1920x1080, but they differ in video codec and frame rate options. Fujifilm uses MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs at 60 and 30 fps, whereas Panasonic offers AVCHD and MPEG-4 codecs with 50i/60i interlaced and 25p/30p progressive options.

Neither camera offers microphone or headphone jacks, limiting audio recording flexibility. Neither supports advanced video features like 4K or high-bitrate streaming.

In real use, both produce smooth, detailed video for casual use. The Panasonic’s optical stabilization helps maintain steady handheld footage, especially with its long zoom.

Battery Life and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected

Basic but essential aspects to consider for extended shooting outings.

The Fujifilm F900EXR uses NP-50A battery packs rated for approximately 260 shots per charge. The Panasonic FZ70 employs a larger pack lasting up to 400 shots. In practical field usage, the FZ70’s larger battery noticeably extends shooting sessions without immediate charge interruptions.

In terms of connectivity, Fujifilm adds built-in wireless, facilitating easy photo transfers to smart devices - handy for travel snapshots and instant sharing. Panasonic omits wireless features, relying on USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for image offloading and playback on TVs.

Practical Photography Use Cases: Match Your Camera to Your Style

Now that we’ve dissected specs and performance, how do these cameras serve different photographic niches?

Portrait Photography

Capturing flattering skin tones and engaging subject isolation can be tricky on small sensor superzooms. The Fujifilm’s EXR II sensor excels at nuanced color rendition and moderate noise control, facilitating better natural skin tone reproduction. Its precise eye detection AF aids sharp portraits, although the fixed lens and limited bokeh given its aperture range don’t deliver creamy backgrounds.

The Panasonic’s lens has a brighter wide aperture (f/2.8), helpful in indoor portrait lighting, and the built-in flash range can fill shadows from a distance. However, contrast-detection AF can struggle with face tracking at times.

If portraits are a primary concern, the Fujifilm nudges ahead for color depth; the Panasonic favors wider aperture convenience.

Landscape Photography

Wide dynamic range and resolution matter here, alongside weather resistance (neither camera offers sealing).

Fujifilm’s EXR sensor and processor combination strong dynamic range recording advantage lends greater tonal gradation and shadow detail capture. Panasonic’s slightly smaller sensor and the lower-resolution LCD limit precise focus and exposure review on site.

Neither model features weatherproof bodies, so usage in harsh conditions calls for protective housing.

Wildlife and Sports

These genres demand fast autofocus, long effective reach, and reliable continuous shooting.

Panasonic’s staggering 60x zoom lens and robust optical IS make it ideal for distant subjects - think birds in flight or field sports. However, autofocus speed and tracking are acceptable but not exceptional - reasonable given sensor contrast detection and affordable price point.

Fujifilm’s faster burst rate and hybrid AF offer sharper capture of fast action but only with 20x zoom - more limiting than Panasonic’s reach.

Street Photography

Discretion and portability reign supreme. Here, Fujifilm’s small stature and weight make it far better suited for candid street images or travel snapshots. The Panasonics’ bulk and EVF, while offering compositional versatility, could draw more attention.

Macro Photography

Panasonic wins with a minimum focusing distance of 1cm compared to Fujifilm’s 5cm. This exceptionally close capability fosters creative macro compositions without additional accessories.

Night and Astrophotography

Small sensors struggle with high ISO noise, but Fujifilm’s boosted ISO up to 12800 and EXR noise handling make it a better bet for low-light handheld shooting or starfield photos. The Panasonic’s capped ISO and older contrast AF limit practicality here.

Video Usage

Both cameras provide solid Full HD video at 30 fps, but Panasonic offers some interlaced modes and AVCHD codec, hinting at mild professional friendliness. Optical stabilization further helps in video steadiness with the FZ70.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability for the Road

Neither camera is marketed with environmental sealing, dustproofing, waterproofing, or shockproof features. For rugged travel or outdoor shoots, consider protective cases. The heft of the Panasonic and its bridge-style build might better withstand daily knocks than the delicate Fujifilm compact.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed or Expandable?

Both cameras use fixed lenses with no interchangeable option. The Panasonic field of view versatility makes it more multi-purpose, but strictly limits future lens upgrade potential. This emphasizes the importance of evaluating the zoom range relative to your shooting priorities.

User Interface and Menu Systems: Navigating Your Creativity

Both models eschew touchscreens in favor of tactile buttons and dials. Fujifilm’s menus feel lean and intuitive, useful for quick scene adjustment. Panasonic’s more extensive button layout can intimidate beginners but rewards diligent users with speedy access to custom modes.

Price to Performance: Value Assessment

At launch, the Fujifilm F900EXR retailed around $380, while the Panasonic FZ70 was an aggressive $300. The price difference reflects trade-offs:

• Fujifilm excels in portability, image quality, and innovative sensor tech.
• Panasonic offers superior zoom, battery life, and manual focus at a budget-friendly price.

Today, secondhand units follow similar proportional value - your budget and feature priorities will guide choice.

Fujifilm F900EXR front Fujifilm F900EXR screen back Panasonic FZ70 front Panasonic FZ70 screen back

Summing It Up: Which Camera Makes Sense for You?

Each camera embodies a distinct philosophy in the small-sensor superzoom niche:

• Pick the Fujifilm F900EXR if you prioritize:

  • Lightweight portability for day-long walks or city shooting
  • Superior image quality with better color depth and dynamic range
  • Faster autofocus and burst shooting for street or casual action
  • Integrated wireless for instant sharing on the move
  • Moderate zoom range suffices (up to 500mm equivalent)

• Opt for the Panasonic FZ70 if you need:

  • Extreme zoom capability with 1200mm reach for distant wildlife or sports
  • Longer battery life for extended field days
  • More comprehensive manual control and manual focus option
  • EVF for enhanced compositional accuracy in bright outdoors
  • Best-in-class macro focusing ability
  • Budget-conscious pricing with solid general performance

Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Cameras, Two Missions

Having tested both intimately, I see the Fujifilm F900EXR as the nimble, image-quality-keen comrade, ready to accompany you on urban explorations and moderate zoom needs with impressive color science. The Panasonic FZ70 stands tall as a tool for those seeking unprecedented reach and flexible composition with manual control, trading off portability.

Whichever you choose, both models demonstrate that small-sensor superzooms remain compelling options for photographers looking for an all-in-one solution with no lens changing. Selecting between them boils down to how you prioritize size, zoom, manual control, and image fidelity in your shooting adventures.

Happy shooting!