Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V
Portability
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
Portability
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
Fujifilm HS35EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Announced January 2013
- Superseded the Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Succeeded the Sony HX100V
- Renewed by Sony HX300
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm HS35EXR (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm HS35EXR (1/2") and HX200V (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm HS35EXR was introduced 9 months after the HX200V so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm HS35EXR grades versus the HX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm HS35EXR Gallery and Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm HS35EXR over the Sony HX200V
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | More modern by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Fujifilm HS35EXR
| HX200V | Fujifilm HS35EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Sony HX200V
| Fujifilm HS35EXR | HX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm HS35EXR has outer measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") and a weight of 687 grams (1.51 lbs) while the Sony HX200V has measurements of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm HS35EXR compared to the HX200V.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm HS35EXR and HX200V is 59 and 66 respectively.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm HS35EXR and HX200V.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm HS35EXR having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX200V will render more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm HS35EXR should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2")
focusing manually
good megapixels (18MP)
includes face detection focusing
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Street photography details
Sony HX200V Street photography details
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
sensor size is very small (1/2")
more heavy than competition (687 grams)
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
heavier than others in class (583g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Sports photography info
Sony HX200V Sports photography info
great zoom range (24-720mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
offers tracking focus
good battery (600 shots)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
does not have phase detect AF
incredible zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery life (450 CIPA)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
good battery (600 shots)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long zoom (720mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (687g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
great battery life (450 shots)
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (27mm)
very long zoom (810mm)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (583 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Landscape photography information
Sony HX200V Landscape photography information
focusing manually
decently wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
saves RAW files
good battery (600 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
no Timelapse recording
focusing manually
fairly wide (27mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
great battery life (450 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm HS35EXR Vlogging information
Sony HX200V Vlogging information
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no microphone jack
more heavy than competition (687 grams)
fairly wide (27mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic jack
heavier than others in class (583g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony HX200V Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2012-05-11 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 30.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | 12.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 687g (1.51 lb) | 583g (1.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 600 photographs | 450 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-W126 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat）) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $380 | $480 |