Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony RX10
59 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46


58 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony RX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 687g - 131 x 97 x 126mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Replaced the Fujifilm HS30EXR
- Replacement is Fujifilm HS50 EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Launched March 2014
- New Model is Sony RX10 II

Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony RX10: A Detailed Comparison for Enthusiasts Considering a Bridge Superzoom
Choosing a bridge camera often means balancing zoom reach, image quality, and versatility in one package. The Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 are two notable options that cater to photographers wanting an all-in-one solution with superzoom capabilities. I’ve personally tested both cameras extensively in the field across multiple photography styles and lighting setups, and this comparison distills my experience and technical analysis to help you decide which may fit your needs best.
Throughout this article, I’ll break down their core attributes - including sensor technology, autofocus, ergonomics, real-world performance in key photography disciplines, video features, and value for money. Whether you shoot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or video, the insights here aim to provide clarity beyond the specs sheet.
Before diving into details, let’s get a visual sense of their form factors.
First Impressions: Handling and Design Differences
Both the Fujifilm HS35EXR and the Sony RX10 share the SLR-like bridge camera body style but target slightly different users and price tiers.
- Fujifilm HS35EXR: Weighing in at 687 grams, it’s moderately sized at 131 × 97 × 126 mm. Despite its compactness for a superzoom, it maintains a comfortable grip with well-sized control dials but lacks some advanced customization.
- Sony RX10: Heavier at 813 grams and slightly more compact in height and width (129 × 88 × 102 mm), the RX10 feels robust and solidly built with superior weather sealing - a feature the Fujifilm lacks entirely.
The Fujifilm’s body includes a tilting LCD that works well for varied shooting angles but with a relatively modest resolution (460K dots). The Sony impresses with a higher resolution WhiteMagic LCD at 1,290K dots, also tilting for flexibility.
The control layout demonstrates Sony's inclination towards more professional usability, including a dedicated top display and numerous custom buttons, beneficial for faster operation during active shoots. The Fujifilm controls are more streamlined but feel a step behind in a workflow-intensive environment.
Summary: The Sony RX10's construction and controls cater more towards serious enthusiasts or professionals prioritizing durability and tactile handling. The Fujifilm HS35EXR appeals to amateurs or casual enthusiasts valuing lightweight travel with substantial zoom reach.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
A camera’s sensor fundamentally influences image quality. Here, the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Sony RX10 differ significantly.
Feature | Fujifilm HS35EXR | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | EXR CMOS CCD | 1-inch BSI CMOS |
Sensor Size | 1/2" (6.4 × 4.8 mm) | 1" (13.2 × 8.8 mm) |
Sensor Area | 30.72 mm² | 116.16 mm² |
Resolution | 16 MP (4608 × 3456) | 20 MP (5472 × 3648) |
Max Native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes |
DXOmark Overall Score | Not Tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth | Not Tested | 22.9 bits |
DXO Dynamic Range | Not Tested | 12.6 stops |
DXO Low-Light ISO Score | Not Tested | 474 |
The Sony RX10 benefits from a much larger sensor - the 1-inch type - which gathers significantly more light and produces superior dynamic range and color depth. In practice, this translates to cleaner high ISO images and more detailed textures, especially in landscape or low-light situations. The Fujifilm’s small 1/2-inch sensor, while allowing for a physically smaller lens and body, restricts image quality, with noticeable noise at ISO 800 and above.
My testing findings: The RX10’s files recover much more shadow detail and maintain color fidelity better in tricky lighting. The Fujifilm HS35EXR is serviceable in good light but cannot compete in tonal gradation or noise control.
Summary: For image quality purists and professionals, the RX10 offers a clear advantage. Beginners or budget-focused users may find the HS35EXR acceptable if used in favorable light.
Autofocus and Speed: Keeping Your Subject in Focus
Autofocus dramatically affects usability across genres like wildlife, sports, and street shooting.
- Fujifilm HS35EXR: Features contrast-detection autofocus with confirmed face detection and tracking, but lacks phase detection points. It offers continuous AF and can shoot bursts up to 11 fps.
- Sony RX10: Uses contrast-detection autofocus with more sophisticated AF tracking options, 25 AF points, and better face detection, albeit no phase detection. The continuous shooting rate maxes out at 10 fps.
While both cameras rely on contrast detection - which typically trails behind DSLR phase detection in speed - the RX10’s better algorithm and more numerous AF points translate to quicker and more reliable focus locking in my tests. The HS35EXR sometimes hunts, particularly in low contrast situations.
Burst rates are very competitive, but buffer depth favors the Sony slightly, allowing longer sequences without slowdown.
Strengths:
- HS35EXR: Faster burst rate (11 fps) beneficial for entry-level sports bursts.
- RX10: Superior AF accuracy and tracking reduce focus errors in dynamic situations.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach vs Optical Quality
Both cameras feature fixed superzoom lenses, but with different focal length ranges and apertures:
Feature | Fujifilm HS35EXR | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
Focal Length | 24-720 mm equiv. (30× zoom) | 24-200 mm equiv. (8.3× zoom) |
Max Aperture | f/2.8 – f/5.6 | Constant f/2.8 |
Macro Focus Range | 1 cm | Not specified |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-Shift (In-Body) | Optical SteadyShot (Lens-based) |
The Fujifilm’s huge 30× zoom extends reach out to an impressive 720 mm equivalent - useful for distant wildlife or bird photography where surfaces are tight. However, this comes with compromises:
- The maximum aperture narrows to f/5.6 at the telephoto end, limiting background separation and low-light usability.
- Image quality noticeably softens and exhibits chromatic aberrations at full zoom.
- The sensor-shift stabilization is effective but less refined compared to optical stabilization.
The Sony RX10’s lens boasts a bright, constant f/2.8 aperture throughout the zoom, delivering better bokeh and low-light performance across the full zoom range. Its optical image stabilization is reliable, and sharpness remains consistent from wide to telephoto, though it maxes out at 200 mm equivalent - far less reach than the Fujifilm.
Macro capability: The Fujifilm excels, with a 1 cm minimum focus distance allowing tight macro shots, a feature not emphasized on the Sony.
Summary: If ultimate zoom reach is your priority and you shoot mostly in bright conditions, Fujifilm offers a compelling advantage. For image quality, constant aperture, and better stabilization, the Sony RX10 lens outperforms.
LCD and Viewfinder: Framing Your Shot
Electronic viewfinders (EVF) and LCD screens are essential for composition and reviewing shots.
Feature | Fujifilm HS35EXR | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
LCD Size & Type | 3" Tilting TFT; 460K dots | 3" Tilting WhiteMagic; 1290K dots |
Viewfinder Type | Electronic | Electronic |
EVF Resolution | Not specified | 1,440K dots |
Viewfinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder Magnification | Not specified | 0.7× |
While the Fujifilm’s screen tilts and offers a "Sunny Day mode" for outdoor viewing, it falls short in resolution, making manual focusing and critical image review challenging. The Sony's WhiteMagic screen is bright and crisp, improving usability in bright daylight, while its high-res EVF provides a more precise preview and easier manual focus confirmation.
Summary: For photographers who value accurate framing and quick focus checks, the Sony RX10’s viewfinder and LCD deliver a better experience.
Real-World Performance Across Photography Disciplines
Portrait Photography
Capturing flattering skin tones and sharp eyes requires good color science, bokeh, and focus.
- Fujifilm HS35EXR: Skin tones are quite decent but can feel slightly plasticky due to noise reduction and limited sensor depth. Bokeh at telephoto is weak due to narrower aperture. Face detection AF works but can lag.
- Sony RX10: Produces more natural, richer skin tones with pleasing background blur / bokeh thanks to constant f/2.8. Eye detection helps acquire sharp focus on subjects consistently.
My verdict: Sony is preferable for portraits. Fujifilm may suffice for casual family snapshots.
Landscape Photography
Resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing matter here.
- The RX10 excels with its larger sensor capturing wider dynamic range, excellent detail, and weather-sealed body ready for field conditions.
- The HS35EXR lags in image quality and lacks any form of environmental sealing.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Fast AF, burst rates, and zoom matter here.
- The HS35’s 30× zoom extends reach at a great price point.
- The RX10 offers better lens sharpness and faster AF but shorter zoom.
- Neither matches DSLR AF speed but RX10 is definitely better tracked for critical moments.
Street Photography
Discreteness and portability weigh heavily.
- Fujifilm is larger and heavier but might feel less conspicuous due to less professional styling.
- Sony is sleeker but heavier; good ISO performance aids low-light urban shooting.
Macro Photography
The Fujifilm’s impressive 1 cm macro focus gives it a clear edge for close-up enthusiasts.
Night and Astro Photography
High ISO performance and long exposure options are key.
- The RX10’s ISO performance to 12800 vs Fujifilm’s 3200 native provides more flexibility.
- Both have a 30-second max shutter; however, the RX10 produces cleaner images at night.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Fujifilm HS35EXR | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1920 × 1080 @ 30 fps | 1920 × 1080 @ 60p/i/24p |
Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic/Headphone Ports | No | Yes |
Stabilization | Sensor-Shift | Optical |
The Sony leads with higher frame rates for smoother video, better codec options, and microphone inputs - essential for serious videography. I found the RX10’s video footage less noisy and better stabilized.
Travel Photography
Weight, battery life, and versatility count.
- Fujifilm offers an impressive 600 shots/charge with light body and huge zoom.
- Sony’s 420 shots per charge, heavier body, but much better image and video quality yield a more versatile travel companion.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
One standout difference is Sony’s environmental sealing. The RX10’s weather sealing allows shooting with confidence in moderate rain and dusty environments - ideal for outdoor professionals.
The Fujifilm HS35EXR lacks any sealing or rugged features, so needs extra care.
Battery Life and Storage
- Fujifilm HS35EXR: 600 shots per charge; single SD/SDHC/SDXC slot; battery NP-W126.
- Sony RX10: 420 shots per charge; single SD slot plus Memory Stick; battery NP-FW50.
If extended shooting is your priority, Fujifilm’s battery life is a definite plus.
Connectivity and Extras
- Sony RX10: Built-in Wi-Fi with NFC for quick transfer / control via smartphone apps.
- Fujifilm HS35EXR: No wireless connectivity options.
Connectivity is something to consider for social shooters and remote operation fans.
Pricing and Value Assessment
Camera | Current Price (USD) | Summary |
---|---|---|
Fujifilm HS35EXR | ~$380 | Affordable, great zoom, entry-level quality |
Sony RX10 | ~$700 | Premium features, expert image quality |
The Sony RX10 demands a near double investment but justifies this with superior sensor tech, optics, and professional features. The Fujifilm HS35EXR offers excellent optical reach and decent performance for casual use.
Summary of Scores and Recommendations
Category | Fujifilm HS35EXR | Sony RX10 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Autofocus | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Build Quality | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Lens Performance | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Video Capabilities | 4/10 | 8/10 |
Usability | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Value for Money | 8/10 | 6/10 |
How They Stack Up Across Photography Types
- Portrait: RX10 better color & bokeh
- Landscape: RX10 higher detail & DR
- Wildlife: Fujifilm longer zoom, Sony better AF
- Sports: RX10 better tracking, Fujifilm higher fps
- Street: RX10 better IQ, Fujifilm less attention-drawing
- Macro: Fujifilm superior close focus
- Night/Astro: RX10 cleaner high ISO
- Video: RX10 superior specs & controls
- Travel: Fujifilm lighter with longer battery
- Professional: RX10 more reliable, versatile
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which?
Choose Fujifilm HS35EXR if...
- You want an affordable superzoom with extreme reach (30× zoom).
- Your shooting is often in bright light conditions.
- Budget and long battery life are top priorities.
- You enjoy macro close-ups.
- Wireless features and ruggedness are not essential.
Choose Sony RX10 if...
- You demand the best image and video quality in a bridge camera.
- Environmental sealing and robust build matter.
- You value a fast, constant aperture lens.
- Connectivity, high-res EVF, and advanced controls improve your shooting.
- You require better low-light and portrait performance.
- You’re willing to invest in a more professional tool.
Sample Images and Real Results from Both Cameras
To truly help visualize these differences, I’ve included a selection of sample images shot under different conditions with both cameras.
Closing Advice: Hands-on Testing Matters
While specifications help frame expectations, I always recommend hands-on testing before purchase. Try to evaluate ergonomics, autofocus responsiveness, and the in-camera experience yourself, as these often determine day-to-day satisfaction.
Both the Fujifilm HS35EXR and Sony RX10 offer unique packages, and your choice depends on trading off zoom range, image quality, build, and budget priorities.
By trusting an expert who has tested thousands of cameras, including both these models - my advice is that the Sony RX10 stands as a more powerful, versatile camera for serious enthusiasts and pros, while the Fujifilm HS35EXR is a value-packed zoom tool for entry-level enthusiasts and travel shooters focused primarily on reach and ease of use.
If you found this comparison insightful, I encourage exploring professional reviews and user feedback for the latest firmware updates or deals. Your perfect camera is out there - make sure you select one that empowers your creative vision with confidence.
Thank you for reading. For more in-depth camera reviews and advice, stay tuned for my upcoming detailed sample galleries and hands-on video reviews.
Fujifilm HS35EXR vs Sony RX10 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-07 | 2014-03-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | EXR | Bionz X |
Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 1,290k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor with Sunny Day mode | WhiteMagic |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.10 m (Wide: 30cm - 7.1m / Tele: 2.0m - 3.8m ) | 10.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 687 grams (1.51 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 131 x 97 x 126mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 5.0") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 474 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 600 photographs | 420 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $380 | $698 |