Fujifilm JX370 vs Fujifilm XP90: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Cameras from Fuji

When it comes to compact cameras, Fujifilm has long been known for its build quality and distinctive color science. But how do two of its compact models - the more budget-friendly Fujifilm FinePix JX370 and the ruggedized Fujifilm XP90 - stack up against each other when you dig into the technical details, real-world performance, and user experience? Having spent thousands of hours testing cameras across genres, I set out to compare these two. The goal? To help you, whether an enthusiast or a professional seeking a compact backup, to understand which model fits your photographic lifestyle best.

Let’s start with a side-by-side look at their physical presence:

As you can see, the JX370 is lighter and smaller, making it pocket-friendly, whereas the XP90 carries extra weight and bulk - a direct result of its rugged features. But physical size is just the beginning of the story.

Design Philosophy and Ergonomics: Simplicity vs. Rugged Versatility

Looking from above, you immediately notice different design cues:

The JX370 keeps things minimal - intuitive but very basic controls without external dials or dedicated buttons for manual modes. No viewfinder, a small 2.7” LCD (230k dots), and fixed-lens simplicity hint at this camera’s straightforward point-and-shoot ambition. Its ergonomics are friendly for casual users but lack warmth for photographers craving tactile feedback or faster adjustments.

In contrast, the XP90 exudes a tougher vibe: sealed body (waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof), grip-friendly contours, and a larger three-inch LCD with a significantly higher resolution (920k dots). There are no external exposure controls here either, but the overall layout hints at a camera ready for harsh environments and fast outdoor shooting.

Sensor, Image Quality & Technical Foundations: CCD vs BSI-CMOS

One of the biggest differences lies beneath the hood: sensor technology.

Both cameras use a 1/2.3" sensor size - typical for compact cameras - but the JX370 employs an older 14MP CCD sensor, while the XP90 sports a more modern 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor. From my experience, BSI-CMOS sensors generally offer better low-light performance and dynamic range due to their back-illuminated design that captures more light efficiently.

Practically speaking, this translates to the JX370 often struggling with noise beyond ISO 400, whereas the XP90 comfortably pushes to ISO 800 or even 1600 with useful results. The XP90’s sensor is also more responsive to autofocus and burst shooting - important factors in action or wildlife photography - which the CCD’s slower readout tends to limit.

That said, in good daylight conditions, both deliver serviceable images. The JX370’s smaller 2.3" LCD and spotty autofocus can occasionally make framing challenging, whereas the XP90’s brighter, larger screen coupled with face detection autofocus offers greater compositional confidence.

On-Screen Experience: Visibility Counts

A compact camera is nothing without its LCD interface.

The jump from a 2.7-inch 230k-dot screen on the JX370 to a 3.0-inch 920k-dot display on the XP90 is huge in practical terms. On the XP90, you get deep color richness, sharp previews, and excellent visibility even in bright sunlight - a must for outdoor and travel photographers. The JX370 can feel cramped and less vibrant, which can frustrate when trying to check critical focus or exposure.

Neither camera has a viewfinder, which is typical for their class but something to keep in mind for users who prefer or require eye-level shooting.

Photography Across Genres: Who Shines Where?

To get a clear sense of how these cameras perform, I tested them across various photographic disciplines, from portraits to night photography.

Fujifilm JX370 front Fujifilm JX370 screen back Fujifilm XP90 front Fujifilm XP90 screen back

Portraits and Casual Snapshots

For portraits, skin tone rendering and eye detection autofocus matter a lot. The XP90’s face detection autofocus system, supported by contrast detection, is fast and reliable. It locks onto faces easily, making effortless portraits its strength. The JX370 lacks face detection, and autofocus can be slow or miss focus in low contrast scenes. Both struggle with shallow depth of field given the small sensor and lens speed, but the XP90’s steadier performance gives it an edge.

Landscape and Travel Photography

For landscapes, dynamic range and resolution count, and weather sealing is a significant plus for field shoots. The XP90’s CMOS sensor’s better dynamic range and higher resolution (16MP vs 14MP) aid in capturing details and tonal gradations. Plus, its rugged build means you can comfortably shoot in drizzle, dust, or cold conditions, which the JX370’s aging design simply can’t handle.

Battery life also matters for travelers. The XP90 offers slightly longer life (210 shots vs 190), and the internal storage along with SD/SDHC/SDXC slots provides flexibility on long trips.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Burst rates and autofocus tracking make or break in fast-action photography. The XP90 allows 10fps continuous shooting, whereas the JX370 manages just 1fps - making the latter unsuitable for sports or wildlife action. Also, the XP90’s image stabilization (sensor-shift) aids in telephoto handheld shots, minimizing blur - something the JX370 lacks.

Street Photography

You might prefer a discreet, light setup for street shooting. The JX370 is more compact, but its slow autofocus and lower screen visibility can slow you down when capturing fleeting moments. The XP90 is bulkier but faster reacting and better suited for low-light candid shots, given its higher ISO performance.

Macro Magic and Close-Up Capability

Macro enthusiasts demand tight focusing and stabilization.

The XP90 wins here comfortably. Its sensor-shift image stabilization improves handheld macro shots, and its slightly closer focusing distance allows capturing fine details with more clarity. The JX370’s lack of stabilization and slower AF make close-up work more challenging.

Night and Astrophotography Potential

High ISO noise and sensor technology dictate night shooting success.

The XP90’s modern CMOS sensor, combined with stabilization and max native ISO of 3200 (boosted to 6400), opens possibilities for low-light and even casual astrophotography. The JX370’s CCD sensor and max ISO 1600 lead to noisy images at night, limiting its utility.

Neither camera offers long exposure modes ideal for night sky shots, but the XP90’s longer shutter speed ceiling (up to 2000 seconds) theoretically allows for some creative experimentation, albeit limited by its lack of RAW and more advanced exposure controls.

Video Capabilities: HD Clips from Compact Shooters

Video is often a neglected feature but vital for many users.

The XP90 offers a much more user-friendly video experience with Full HD at 60fps, providing smoother, more professional-looking clips. Its image stabilization is a major advantage for handheld video. By comparison, the JX370’s limited 720p at 30fps and Motion JPEG codec yield blocky, less smooth footage that’s less practical for serious video shooters.

Professional Workflow and Reliability: Can They Serve Pro Needs?

Both cameras lack professional-grade RAW support - a major limiting factor for pros wanting full control in post. They are primarily aimed at casual or enthusiast users seeking compact solutions.

However, the XP90’s durability and better autofocus make it a viable rugged backup for pros who need a simple shooting tool outdoors or underwater, perfect for adventure shoots where bigger rigs may be impractical.

Connectivity, Battery, and Storage: Staying Connected and Powered

The XP90 has built-in wireless connectivity (though limited - no Bluetooth or NFC), an HDMI port for external displays, and supports SDXC cards alongside SD/SDHC. The JX370 is more curtailed, lacking wireless features and HDMI.

Battery-wise, they are close: XP90 offers about 210 shots per charge, JX370 about 190. Both use proprietary battery packs (NP-45S for XP90, NP-45A for JX370), so spare batteries can be purchased, but it's worth noting that higher shot counts and energy-saving processor improvements give the XP90 an edge in extended outings.

Grades and Genres: Overall Rankings and Recommendations

Let’s summarize the cameras’ respective strengths visually.

My Take:

• Fujifilm JX370 is an entry-level, super-compact easy-to-use camera for casual shooters and beginners on a budget. Its small size and straightforward operation are undeniable positives. However, limited image quality, slow autofocus, no image stabilization, and subpar low-light/video mean it’s mostly suitable for snapshots and daylight travel.

• Fujifilm XP90 is a step up in every meaningful way: ruggedized for adventure, faster and more versatile with better video and macro options, and strong low-light performance thanks to sensor advancements and stabilization. It makes a compelling secondary camera for enthusiasts and even professionals needing a durable backup or outdoor companion.

What’s the Bottom Line? Who Should Choose Which?

If you want a compact, cheap, no-frills camera for everyday casual snaps and pocket fun, the JX370 is a simple answer. It’s easy to carry and has enough capabilities to serve family events, holidays, and strolls in the park. But be prepared for limitations when lighting isn’t ideal or you need speed.

On the other hand, if you want a rugged travel buddy for hiking, water sports, wildlife watching, or even semi-serious shooting without investing in bulky gear, the XP90 is the better pick. You gain better optics, stabilization, image quality, and video features that make the difference between ‘ok’ pictures and consistently solid results.

Closing Thoughts: Testing Methodology and My Experience

Throughout years of testing, I’ve found that sensor technology, autofocus speed and reliability, and image stabilization remain the greatest differentiators in compact cameras of this level. My reviews involve side-by-side shooting scenarios under controlled and realistic conditions: daylight portraits, dim indoor light, rapid action, macro subjects, and video capture, among others.

Both these Fujifilm models reveal their age in today’s advanced compact landscape. The JX370’s 2011 CCD sensor shows its limits, while the XP90’s 2016 CMOS sensor keeps pace better but still lags behind current generation models. Nonetheless, they exhibit classic Fujifilm traits - solid color reproduction, ergonomic thoughtfulness in the XP90’s case, and a focus on ease of use.

If budget permits and you seek longevity and versatility, the XP90 wins. If you prioritize portability and simplicity, the JX370 remains a valid choice with the caveats mentioned.

Having personally tested thousands of cameras, I encourage readers to weigh their shooting styles, environment, and future-proofing needs. These two cameras meet distinct user profiles, and your choice should reflect your photography priorities rather than specs alone.

In sum, whether you’re shopping for entry-level convenience or tough, versatile performance, your Fujifilm compact awaits - and I hope this comparison helps you point your next shot in the right direction.

Happy shooting!

End of Review