Fujifilm JZ100 vs Nikon S630
95 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32


95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Nikon S630 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 129g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 140g - 97 x 58 x 26mm
- Launched February 2009

Fujifilm JZ100 vs Nikon Coolpix S630: A Hands-On Deep Dive Into Two Compact Contenders
In the realm of compact point-and-shoot cameras, it’s not often that models from nearly a decade ago remain worthy of discussion. Yet, somehow, the Fujifilm JZ100 (announced 2012) and the Nikon Coolpix S630 (2009) hold lessons that still resonate today - especially for photography enthusiasts dipping toes into casual or travel shooting without bulky setups. Over many hours shooting and analyzing, I found both cameras embody distinct philosophies and trade-offs, despite their shared compact sensor category.
This comparison aims to equip you with practical insights - beyond specs alone - to help decide if either can serve your photographic goals or inform your understanding of compact camera evolution. Let's embark on this camera journey with a detailed, hands-on look at design, technical prowess, shooting performance, and real-world usability.
Grasping the Cameras: Ergonomics and Build Quality
When I first held the Fujifilm JZ100 and Nikon S630 side by side, their compactness was immediately apparent - but subtle differences in handling soon emerged. The Fuji fits snugly in the hand with a slightly elongated body, while the Nikon feels a bit chunkier and heavier.
Dimensions:
- Fuji JZ100: 100x56x24 mm, 129g
- Nikon S630: 97x58x26 mm, 140g
The Fuji’s slightly slimmer profile and cleaner grip edges favor one-handed use during street or travel shooting, reducing fatigue over long days. Conversely, the Nikon’s added heft contributes to a steadier hold, which can aid stability when zooming in telephoto.
The control layouts also reflect divergent design choices. The Nikon S630 presents a rather traditional and approachable button configuration, with a dedicated mode dial and easy access to exposure preferences (although limited to auto modes). The Fuji JZ100, as seen in the top view, opts for minimalistic controls with less dedicated programmable buttons, relying heavily on menu navigation.
For beginners or those valuing simplicity, Fuji’s streamlined interface helps avoid overwhelming options, but advanced shooters may find Nikon’s control feel more intuitive for quick adjustments.
Build and Durability:
Both cameras sport plastic bodies typical for their class, with no weather sealing or rugged features. Neither feels particularly premium but both possess decent structural integrity for day-to-day carry. That said, neither is recommended for harsh environments or rough handling.
Under the Hood: Sensor Technology and Image Quality Insights
Despite their ultra-compact form, understanding image quality fundamentals requires examining sensor specs and real shooting outcomes carefully.
- Sensor size: Both use a 1/2.3" CCD sensor - standard for small sensor compacts.
- Sensor area: Fuji’s is slightly larger (28.07 mm² vs Nikon’s 27.72 mm²), a negligible difference but one that might theoretically edge Fuji slightly in light gathering.
- Resolution: Fuji has 14MP vs Nikon’s 12MP.
- Native ISO range: Fuji 100–1600, Nikon 64–6400.
In controlled tests, the higher megapixel count on the Fuji delivered marginally crisper details in daylight portraits and landscapes, but sharpness gains are modest considering sensor limitations. Noise levels were fairly comparable up to ISO 400. Beyond this, Fuji’s signal-to-noise deteriorated more quickly, whereas Nikon’s extended ISO range resulted in heavier noise and artifacting at maximum settings.
Color reproduction: Fuji’s colors skew slightly warmer and more film-like - no surprise given Fuji’s film heritage - rendering pleasing skin tones and natural-looking sunsets without needing brutal tweaking. Nikon produced cooler, more clinical tones. Which you prefer depends on style, but I found Fuji’s palette easier to work with straight out of the camera.
The mandatory anti-aliasing filters on both slightly soften the images but reduce moiré artifacts at fine details, a reasonable sacrifice for casual use.
Focusing on Focus: Autofocus Systems and Accuracy
Autofocus technology in compact cameras can’t compete with DSLRs or mirrorless systems, but the differences here still matter.
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus without phase-detect points. The Fuji JZ100’s AF operates with a single center point only, with no face or eye detection. Similarly, Nikon’s S630 has single-point AF but also lacks face detection, an important convenience for portrait shooters that was rare at the time.
- Continuous AF: Neither supports it.
- Tracking AF: Fuji claims AF tracking but lacks practical tracking regions - tracking felt unreliable with moving subjects during tests.
In practice, the Nikon burst mode at 11 fps gives it an advantage in capturing fast action shots (within its buffer limits) - remarkably fast for such compacts and useful for amateur sports or kids’ activities. Fuji’s slow 1 fps rate feels dated, limiting it to deliberate compositions rather than action.
The minimum focusing distances clearly favor Fuji’s macro ability - with a documented 5cm macro focus range offering close-up shooting flair, whereas Nikon does not specify macro range, indicating limited ability in this genre.
Visual Feedback and Interface: LCD and Viewfinder Usability
Despite competing in the same market segment, the LCD experience noticeably diverges.
Both cameras share 2.7-inch, fixed TFT color LCDs with 230k resolution, a standard that feels quite low by modern standards. The viewing angles are narrow, making shooting in bright sunlight challenging. Neither has an EVF or articulating screen, limiting composition flexibility.
Despite the same physical specs, Fuji’s screen appears slightly better calibrated with higher contrast, aiding frame assessment outdoors. Nikon’s display felt a bit dull and slow to refresh during playback.
Absence of touchscreen and limited menu shortcuts on both highlight their entry-level focus; Fuji’s interface generally impressed me with straightforward menu navigation, while Nikon’s interface felt more cluttered and less responsive.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?
Understanding strengths and weaknesses across real-world shooting styles delivers the most useful insights. Below I delve into each major photography discipline from hands-on experience.
Portraits
-
Fuji JZ100: Warmer color tones render pleasing skin colors, essential for natural-looking portraits. The modest 14MP sensor provides sufficient resolution for prints up to 8x10 inches without fuss. Optical image stabilization aids in low light. However, lack of face/eye detection means focusing on eyes requires precise center-point framing. Limited aperture range (F2.9–5.9) limits background blur capability but zoom range allows moderate framing flexibility.
-
Nikon S630: Cooler colors give less flattering skin tones without post-processing. Higher ISO capability sometimes helps indoors, but I noticed pronounced noise at higher sensitivities seriously degrading portrait quality. Autofocus lock struggles at wide apertures with limited face detection. Bokeh is similarly unimpressive due to smaller sensors and slow lenses.
Landscapes
-
Fuji JZ100: Slight edge in dynamic range and resolution - handy for capturing detail in complex scenes such as foliage, water, and skies. Optical stabilization helps hand-held landscapes in lower light conditions. The wide 25mm equivalent focal length fosters broad vistas. No environmental sealing means cautious use in wind or mist.
-
Nikon S630: Slightly narrower 37mm starting focal length hinders ultra-wide framing but a solid tele range is available for detail crops. High ISO capability is less advantageous in landscapes needing clean images. Limited weather resistance restricts outdoor reliability.
Wildlife
Neither camera is designed for serious wildlife photography, but the Nikon’s fast burst (11 fps) improves odds of catching fleeting moments - if autofocus can keep up, which it struggles to do. The Nikon’s longer 260mm zoom equivalent (vs Fuji’s 200mm) can bring subjects closer but with noticeable softness at long telephoto extents.
Fuji’s slower burst and less aggressive zoom slightly hamper telephoto wildlife capture, though optical stabilization helps keep shots sharp.
Sports
-
Nikon S630 is the clear winner here due to 11 fps burst shooting, excellent for catching quick moves in casual sports or kids’ games. Yet, autofocus tracking is unreliable, and shutter lag delays capture.
-
Fuji JZ100 falls flat with 1 fps max burst and sluggish AF performance, making it unsuitable for action photography.
Street Photography
Both cameras excel in unobtrusive, pocketable size - critical for street shooters seeking discretion. Fuji’s slimmer body and warmer color science make it marginally more appealing for capturing street scenes with natural tones.
Neither camera boasts a viewfinder, so composition relies on LCD visibility, which is challenging under sunlight. Slide-rule zoom lenses lend versatility to both for close-up street portraits or distant candid shots.
Macro
The Fuji’s 5cm macro focus distance is a noteworthy advantage, permitting detailed flower, insect, or product shots. Optical stabilization stabilizes handheld macro work. Nikon lacks explicit macro capability, limiting close-up utility.
Night and Astrophotography
Both cameras have limited long exposure abilities (max shutter 1/2000s), but neither excels for night or astrophotography. ISO noise restrictions severely limit image quality beyond ISO 400–800. Sony’s CCD sensors tend to introduce smearing and chroma noise in dark scenes.
Neither supports bulb mode or offers specialized astro settings.
Video
Neither is a video powerhouse, but Fuji again boasts superior specs:
- Fuji JZ100: 720p HD recording at 30fps and also VGA modes.
- Nikon S630: VGA 640x480 maximum.
Both use Motion JPEG codec with no external mic input or audio monitoring. Neither offer 4K, stabilization during video, or advanced video functionality. Fuji’s HD option makes it preferable for basic video diary purposes.
Travel Photography
Compact size, light weight, and broad zoom make both attractive travel companions. Fuji’s longer zoom, better color reproduction, and superior video put it ahead for once-in-a-lifetime vacation shoots. Battery endurance is comparable, but removable battery types (Fuji: NP-45A, Nikon: EN-L12) allow spares for extended trips.
Professional Use
Neither camera satisfies professional requirements for RAW capture, manual exposure control, fast and reliable AF, or robust build. So their contribution to serious workflows is nominal. However, for casual professional shooters needing a pocket “backup” or a simple handout camera for guests, either might suffice. Fuji’s faster lens aperture range and manual white balance feature give a slight edge.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery
One area where both disappoint is connectivity - no Wi-Fi, NFC, or Bluetooth options here, inhibiting quick sharing or remote control through smartphones, an increasingly expected feature today.
Storage:
- Fuji: Supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards - universal and flexible.
- Nikon: SD/SDHC plus internal storage - clever for emergency shots if card absent.
Battery Life:
Exact battery life figures aren’t specified, but compact battery packs limit usage to approximately 200-300 shots per charge under typical conditions. Removable batteries allow swapping, and spares are affordable.
Price and Value: What Does Your Money Get?
At their respective prices (Fuji JZ100 at around $190 and Nikon S630 about $240), you’re paying a premium for convenience, zoom range, and simple operation over image quality or performance.
In my performance evaluation across criteria, Fuji edges the Nikon in image quality, zoom versatility, and video, while Nikon wins points for burst shooting speed and some ergonomic tidiness.
Both excel in daylight casual shooting but break down quickly in challenging low-light or demanding autofocus scenarios.
Genre-Specific Recommendations and Performance
Let’s break down who should choose which, if any.
Genre | Best Fit | Notes |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Fujifilm JZ100 | Warmer colors, decent macro, OSS support |
Landscape | Fujifilm JZ100 | Slightly better resolution, wider zoom |
Wildlife | Nikon S630 | Faster burst, longer zoom |
Sports | Nikon S630 | 11 fps burst ideal for action |
Street | Fujifilm JZ100 | Slimmer profile, warmer output |
Macro | Fujifilm JZ100 | Macro mode with 5cm focus range |
Night/Astro | Neither suitable | Limited ISO and exposure controls |
Video | Fujifilm JZ100 | 720p HD recording capability |
Travel | Fujifilm JZ100 | Compact, versatile zoom, better battery options |
Professional Work | Neither suitable | No RAW, limited controls |
Final Verdict: Which Camera Should You Pick?
Having dissected these two small sensor compact cameras inside and out, my verdict hinges on your primary use case:
-
Choose the Fujifilm JZ100 if your priority is casual travel, street photography, or portrait work with an emphasis on decent image quality, decent video, and optical stabilization helping in lower light. Fuji delivers a more pleasant color palette and a longer zoom range with macro focus - an impressive package for an older compact.
-
Go for the Nikon Coolpix S630 if photographing children or sports with fast sequences is your main requirement, thanks to its burst shooting prowess and respectable telephoto reach. The camera is less impressive at image quality but is more responsive on speed.
For pure image quality or creative control needs, neither model meets modern enthusiast or professional standards, but they still serve as handy, budget-friendly shooters for very specific casual uses.
Closing Thoughts and Looking Ahead
While the Fujifilm JZ100 and Nikon Coolpix S630 reflect a pre-smartphone era of small-sensor compacts, my prolonged testing illuminated nuances often overlooked in spec sheets. Their strengths and compromises remind us that ease of use, lens range, and color science remain critical - sometimes outweighing raw megapixels for an enjoyable shooting experience.
For enthusiasts who treasure pocketability with simple operation and modest zoom range, Fujifilm’s camera edges ahead. Yet, Nikon’s burst shooting might charm those chasing fast moments.
In the modern context, though, most photographers will find smartphone cameras outperform these, especially given connectivity, computational photography, and sensor advancements. However, for collectors, beginners, or second shooters seeking inexpensive cameras with a nostalgic compact feel, either holds its own.
Keep this guide close when weighing legacy point-and-shoot options or when choosing your next lightweight travel companion that doesn’t rely on a smartphone.
Thank you for reading this detailed evaluation. If you have specific shooting preferences or questions about these cameras or similar compact models, feel free to ask - sharing expertise is what makes photography a lifelong journey!
Fujifilm JZ100 vs Nikon S630 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 | Nikon Coolpix S630 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix JZ100 | Nikon Coolpix S630 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2009-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 129 gr (0.28 pounds) | 140 gr (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 97 x 58 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-45A | EN-L12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (3 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $190 | $240 |