Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Raise to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Announced January 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is fairly similar and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S4200 was manufactured 24 months earlier than the WB350F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Fujifilm S4200 scores versus the WB350F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix S4200 & Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm S4200 Gallery & Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S4200 | WB350F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Fujifilm S4200
| WB350F | Fujifilm S4200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S4200 and Samsung WB350F
| Fujifilm S4200 | WB350F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S4200 features exterior measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm S4200 versus the WB350F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S4200 and WB350F is 67 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The graphic below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S4200 and WB350F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB350F to offer you extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older Fujifilm S4200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Fujifilm S4200 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Samsung WB350F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S4200 | Samsung WB350F |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-05 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 543 grams (1.20 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery style | AA | - |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $200 | $260 |