Clicky

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3

Portability
61
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Fujifilm FinePix S9400W front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs

Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
  • Launched January 2014
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus SH-2
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SH-3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and the SH-3 (16MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm S9400W was revealed 3 years before the SH-3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9400W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm S9400W matches up vs the SH-3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Olympus SH-3

 Fujifilm S9400W SH-3 

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Fujifilm S9400W

 SH-3 Fujifilm S9400W 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016January 2014More recent by 25 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SH-3

 Fujifilm S9400W SH-3 
Manual focus No manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Display resolution460k460kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm S9400W features external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") having a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Compare the Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SH-3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the SH-3.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9400W and SH-3 is 61 and 88 respectively.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and SH-3.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of images although you would want to factor the production date of the products into consideration. The older Fujifilm S9400W is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography details
Olympus SH-3 Portrait photography details
37
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
44
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW files
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W Street photography info
Olympus SH-3 Street photography info
41
image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than others in class (670g)
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
offers touch focus
lighter than competition in class (271g)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Olympus SH-3
55
amazing zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (500 shots)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
51
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
better than average battery (380 per charge)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm S9400W as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Travel photography camera
54
better than average battery (500 per charge)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (1200mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (670g)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
74
better than average battery (380 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
offers touch focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-3
44
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
better than average battery (500 CIPA)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
55
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (380 per charge)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm S9400W
Vlogging with Olympus SH-3
26
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than others in class (670g)
35
fairly wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
does not have external mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm S9400W vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm S9400W and Olympus SH-3
 Fujifilm FinePix S9400WOlympus Stylus SH-3
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix S9400W Olympus Stylus SH-3
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-01-06 2016-02-08
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1200mm (50.0x) 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance 1cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 201 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 97% -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1700 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames per sec 11.5 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash options Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 670g (1.48 pounds) 271g (0.60 pounds)
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 380 photographs
Type of battery AA Battery Pack
Battery model 4 x AA LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $330 $579