Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200
Portability
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
61 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Portability
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
Fujifilm S9400W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2014
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm S9400W (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9400W was unveiled 18 months after the FZ200 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm S9400W scores vs the FZ200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix S9400W and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9400W Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9400W over the Panasonic FZ200
| Fujifilm S9400W | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 |  | July 2012 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Fujifilm S9400W
| FZ200 | Fujifilm S9400W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9400W and Panasonic FZ200
| Fujifilm S9400W | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm S9400W provides outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm S9400W and the FZ200.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9400W and FZ200 is 61 and 65 respectively.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by going over specifications. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9400W and FZ200.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Fujifilm S9400W to offer you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9400W provides an edge in sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Portrait photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography info
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with face detect focus
manual focus not available
no external flash support
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Street photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors (670g)
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Fujifilm S9400W
Sports photography with Panasonic FZ200
long zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery (500 per charge)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking autofocus
great battery life (540 per charge)
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography factors
better than average battery (500 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (670g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
great battery life (540 CIPA)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
no Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Landscape photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography info
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (500 per charge)
manual focus not available
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
has manual focus
relatively wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (540 shots)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9400W Vlogging details
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging details
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
more heavy than competitors (670 grams)
relatively wide (25mm)
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external mic socket
slow max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than others in class (588 grams)
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S9400W vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix S9400W | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-01-06 | 2012-07-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 23 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 201 thousand dots | 1,312 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m | 13.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, forced flash, suppressed flash, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i), 1280 x 960 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 588g (1.30 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 540 photos |
| Type of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $330 | $499 |
