Bridging the Zoom Gap: Fujifilm SL1000 vs Nikon Coolpix B600 – A Pro’s Detailed Comparison

When it comes to superzoom bridge cameras, the temptation of having a 50- or 60-times optical zoom lens tucked into a single, reasonably priced package is undeniable. I’ve tested hundreds of cameras in this niche over the past decade, and while these models rarely satisfy hardcore professionals, they pack a serious punch for enthusiasts who crave flexibility without breaking the bank. Today I'm sharing an in-depth, hands-on comparison between two popular, small-sensor superzooms aimed squarely at the enthusiast market: Nikon’s Coolpix B600 (announced 2019) and Fujifilm’s FinePix SL1000 (released back in 2013). Both wield their own strengths, quirks, and compromises.

Let’s dive deep into the features, real-world handling, image quality, and overall usability to reveal which camera is the better fit for your photography needs and wallet.

Size Matters: Ergonomics and Handling First Impressions

Before even cracking open the menu systems, the first tactile experience with a camera often sets the tone for long-term user satisfaction - especially with versatile bridge cameras designed for extended shooting sessions. Here’s the Fuji and Nikon side by side:

At 659 grams, the Fuji SL1000 carries a bit more heft versus the Nikon B600’s relatively spritely 500 grams. The Fuji’s chunkier build (123 x 89 x 123 mm) feels more like a DSLR clone, catering well to photographers who prefer a solid, stable grip - perfect if your hands double as clubs for thumbs, I’ll admit I’ve been there. In contrast, the Nikon’s slightly smaller footprint (122 x 82 x 99 mm) makes it more travel-friendly and easier to stash for street photography or wildlife expeditions when discretion and portability edge priorities.

Though neither model is compact by any stretch, the Fuji’s sculpted grip and SLR-style body hold an ergonomic advantage for extended handheld use, thanks to a more pronounced thumb rest and contoured finger grooves. The Nikon, while lighter, offers more generic handling, and its slimmer grip won't appease those used to robust camera chassis.

Top View Layout: Controls and Usability

Beyond size is the camera’s command hub - the top panel and button arrangement that make changing settings on the fly a breeze or a chore.

The Fujifilm SL1000 sports dedicated dials for aperture, shutter priority, and manual exposure modes - a somewhat rare feature in bridge superzooms of this price and sensor class. I tested this extensively on location shoots and found this a blessing when adjusting depth of field during portraits or tweaking shutter speed for wildlife photography in variable light without fumbling through layers of menu options.

Conversely, the Nikon B600 skips manual exposure modes entirely, relying on fully automatic or program modes. While this might make it approachable for beginners or casual shooters who want “set it and forget it” simplicity, it’s a dealbreaker if you want granular creative control.

Both cameras sadly lack touchscreen interfaces, meaning navigation remains menu-deep and tied to physical buttons, which takes some patience, especially for novice users.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

At their core, these cameras share the same sensor size: 1/2.3” BSI-CMOS chips measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, delivering 16MP resolution capable of 4608 x 3456 pixel outputs. However, the devil’s in the details.

With identical sensor areas and pixel counts, their theoretical baseline image quality is similar - meaning sharpness potential and pixel-level noise control depend heavily on processor implementations, lens quality, stabilization, and ISO management.

The Fuji SL1000 edges out slightly here with a maximum native ISO rating of 12,800 compared to the Nikon’s maximum ISO 6,400. This suggests the Fuji’s sensor and processing pipeline can better handle low light and night scenarios, albeit with the usual caveats of smaller sensors showing noise above ISO 800 or 1600 in real shooting.

In my lab and field tests, the SL1000 exhibited cleaner images at ISO 800 and manageable noise at 1600–3200, whereas the B600 struggled past ISO 800, resulting in softer, noisier shots. Dynamic range was tight on both cameras - as expected from small sensors - but the Fuji’s slightly better exposure latitude meant highlights clipped less readily.

Screen and Viewfinder: Framing Your Shot

Both cameras feature 3-inch LCD screens of roughly 920K dots resolution, but differ in articulation and viewfinder presence.

The Fuji’s tilt-angle LCD provides harder versatility for shooting awkward angles, macro close-ups, and low-to-the-ground nature shots, which I found handy during portrait sessions wanting lower perspectives or for unusual wildlife framing.

Nikon opted for a fixed LCD with standard tilt, limiting flexibility, but the B600 compensates with a slightly larger and brighter display panel. Neither has touch focus or menu navigation, which feels dated but unsurprising for cameras in this segment.

A notable drawback for the Nikon is the absence of any viewfinder - electronic or optical - so you’re forced to shoot “from the hip” using the rear screen. Fuji’s inclusion of an electronic viewfinder with 920K dots resolution benefits precise framing in bright outdoor conditions, eliminating glare problems that plague LCD-only cameras.

Autofocus and Speed: Catching the Moment

For wildlife, sports, and fast-moving subjects, autofocus speed and accuracy can make or break a camera’s effectiveness.

The Nikon B600 boasts contrast-detect autofocus with three AF modes including continuous, single, and tracking, supplemented by face detection. It can track subjects reasonably well, albeit occasionally chasing backgrounds in dense foliage. Shutter speeds max out at 1/4000 second, providing scope to freeze fast action.

The Fuji SL1000, from 2013, compromises with only center-weighted AF and no face or tracking detection, and lacks continuous autofocus modes entirely. This means put-your-trust-in luck focusing, or switch to manual techniques - hardly ideal for wildlife or sports shooters. Continuous shooting speed is similar: Fujifilm offers up to 10 fps bursts versus Nikon’s unspecified but more modest rates.

Through my field trials photographing running dogs and winging birds at dawn, the Nikon’s autofocus was consistently more reliable, locking faster and maintaining focus better across varied conditions. The Fuji was more prone to focus hunting, limiting its ability to capture decisive moments.

Lens Performance and Zoom Reach: Let’s Talk Glass

Superzooms are defined by their lens versatility, and here, both cameras flex impressive ranges:

• Fujifilm SL1000: 24-1200 mm equivalent, f/2.9–6.5 aperture
• Nikon B600: 24-1440 mm equivalent, f/3.3–6.5 aperture

The Nikon’s 60x zoom extends nearly 240mm longer in equivalent focal length, giving wildlife and sports enthusiasts more reach. Yet, the Fujifilm’s slightly faster wide-end aperture (f/2.9 vs f/3.3) translates to better low light and indoor shooting performance, especially for casual portraits and indoor event snaps.

Zoom optics on both models show noticeable softness and chromatic aberrations at extreme telephoto lengths - nothing unexpected in consumer superzooms. Stopping down the aperture and shooting in good light helps. I recommend tripods or very steady hands for maximum telephoto sharpness.

Macro range is better on the Nikon, focusing as close as 1 cm versus Fuji’s “0 cm” macro spec, which practically means no dedicated macro capability.

Build Quality and Weather Sealing

Neither camera offers environmental sealing or ruggedized construction, which disappointed me given Nikon’s 2019 release date. Both require cautious handling in dust, rain, or extreme environments. Neither is shockproof, crushproof, or freezeproof.

The Nikon’s plastic-centric build contributes to its lighter weight but feels less durable in hand. The Fuji’s more solid chassis gives confidence, but at the expense of heft.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery endurance is important on longer shoots and travel where recharge options might be scarce.

The Fujifilm SL1000 tops the score here with approximately 350 shots per charge versus Nikon B600’s 280 shots - a respectable lead but neither is best-in-class. Carrying spares is recommended either way.

Both cameras rely on proprietary lithium-ion packs. Storage-wise, each takes a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. The Nikon additionally features internal storage, a minor convenience in emergencies.

Connectivity and Extras

Connectivity options here are mostly basic:

The inclusion of built-in WiFi on Nikon means quicker image sharing and remote control via smartphone apps - an increasingly important feature for content creators.

Video Capabilities: Not for the Hollywood Set

Both cameras max out Full HD recording at 1080p/60fps (Fuji in Motion JPEG, Nikon in H.264/MPEG-4), lacking 4k or advanced video features.

Fuji supports 10fps burst for stills but limited video file flexibility. Neither has microphone input for external audio or headphone jacks to monitor sound. In practice, they’re more casual video recorders than serious filmmaking tools.

Sample Image Quality: What Do the Shots Actually Say?

Here’s a gallery of various shots from both cameras, covering outdoor landscapes, portraits, and wildlife at different zoom lengths.

Fujifilm SL1000 front Fujifilm SL1000 screen back Nikon B600 front Nikon B600 screen back

• Portraits: The Fuji’s wider aperture and slight edge in image sharpness rendered skin tones more natural and smoother bokeh, though both cameras struggled to isolate subjects against backgrounds due to sensor size limits.
• Landscapes: Sharpness was comparable, but Nikon exhibited marginally better edge clarity wide open, and its higher zoom extended reach on distant features.
• Wildlife: Nikon’s autofocus and longer zoom made it easier to capture crisp bird-in-flight images, whereas Fuji’s hunting focus more often yielded soft results.
• Low light: Fuji performed better at ISO 800-1600, producing less noise and better detail retention.

Performance Scores and Specialty Strengths

Charting overall performance and genre-specific ratings:

• Portrait: Fuji leads on bokeh and exposure control.
• Landscape: Near tie, slight Nikon edge for resolution and zoom reach.
• Wildlife & Sports: Nikon dominates with AF and zoom.
• Street & Travel: Fuji’s grip and EVF slightly favor portability and usability despite weight bulk.
• Macro: Nikon’s 1cm close focusing beats Fuji's lack.
• Night/Astro: Fuji’s extended ISO range is helpful.
• Video: Both lack features but Nikon edges on compression and connectivity.
• Professional Use: Neither camera excels, but Fuji’s manual modes offer marginal creative control benefit.

Pros and Cons: Picking Sides

Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

Pros:

• Manual exposure and shutter/aperture priority modes
• Faster maximum ISO for low-light shooting
• Tilting LCD and electronic viewfinder aid framing
• Solid build quality and ergonomics for long sessions
• Higher continuous shooting speed (10 fps)

Cons:

• Larger and heavier, less travel friendly
• No continuous or tracking autofocus
• No wireless connectivity
• Limited video codec options
• Older model with dated interface

Nikon Coolpix B600

Pros:

• Longer zoom reach (60x) with solid telephoto coverage
• Faster max shutter speed (1/4000 s)
• Autofocus tracking and face detection aids wildlife/sports
• Built-in WiFi for instant sharing / remote control
• Lighter, more compact design (better for travel & street)
• Internal storage backup

Cons:

• No manual exposure controls
• No electronic viewfinder - LCD only
• Fixed LCD screen limits angle flexibility
• Lower max ISO hurts low-light shooting
• Less durable plastic build
• No external flash support

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose Fujifilm SL1000 if you:

• Prioritize creative control with manual exposure modes
• Shoot portraits or night scenes regularly, needing higher ISO headroom
• Prefer an electronic viewfinder for bright scene framing
• Don’t mind extra weight for better grip and weather protection
• Value a tilting screen for flexible shooting positions

Choose Nikon Coolpix B600 if you:

• Need the longest possible zoom on a budget for wildlife or sports
• Value autofocus tracking and face detection for moving subjects
• Want modern connectivity options (WiFi) and easy sharing
• Prefer lighter, more travelable camera bodies for casual shooting
• Are okay with fully automatic exposure and simplified shooting

Personal Takeaway and Buying Advice

From my experience balancing portability, image quality, and controls, I’d lean toward the Nikon B600 for casual hobbyists and travellers who want one superzoom camera to cover everything quickly with minimal fuss. The autofocus system, zoom reach, and WiFi connectivity offer more modern, practical value for everyday versatile shooting and social media sharing.

However, if you fetishize manual control, enjoy pushing creative parameters, and photograph portraits or need better low-light punch, the Fuji SL1000 is still a worthy contender despite its age. It’s also better for those who want an EVF for precise composition and don’t mind toting a bit more camera bulk.

Neither will replace an interchangeable lens system or a larger sensor mirrorless or DSLR, but these bridge superzooms are a compromise between pocket-sized point and shoot simplicity and full DSLR/lens flexibility for a fraction of the cost.

If I had to sum this up in camera clubspeak: the Nikon B600 wins on reach and usability, the Fujifilm SL1000 scores on creative control and ergonomics. Both offer good value for their price points, but your choice hinges on what you prioritize - manual control versus zoom and autofocus sophistication.

Happy shooting!

Footnote: All my hands-on testing included lab sensor reviews, field autofocus speed timing, and side-by-side image quality comparisons shot on tripod and handheld across controlled lighting conditions. I encourage readers to test cameras personally when possible, as subjective ergonomics and brand affinity often play a large role.

[End of article]