Fujifilm XP120 vs Fujifilm Z300
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43


95 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Fujifilm XP120 vs Fujifilm Z300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Updated by Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.9-6.4) lens
- 155g - 92 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched June 2009

Fujifilm FinePix XP120 vs. Fujifilm FinePix Z300: The Ultimate Ultracompact Camera Face-off
When considering an ultracompact camera for everyday adventures or casual photography, two models from Fujifilm often appear on the radar: the Fujifilm FinePix XP120 (announced in 2017) and the older Fujifilm FinePix Z300 (from 2009). Though both share a compact form factor and a fixed-lens design, they serve quite different purposes and reflect vastly different technological eras.
In this hands-on comparison, we’ll explore how these two cameras stack up in various photographic disciplines, their technical makeup, handling, and value propositions. Whether you seek a rugged point-and-shoot companion for travel or a simple snapshot camera for quick photos, we’ll help you uncover which model best fits your shooting style.
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Handling
One of the first factors photographers notice when choosing a camera is its physical size, weight, and ergonomics.
The Fujifilm XP120 is noticeably chunkier and heavier at 203g with dimensions of 110 x 71 x 28 mm. This heft is because it’s designed to be rugged, waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and even freezeproof, making it a perfect companion for outdoor adventures, hiking, beach days, and even some harsh weather.
Meanwhile, the Z300 weighs just 155g and is more compact at 92 x 57 x 19 mm. It is much slimmer but lacks any environmental sealing, limiting its usage to more controlled, everyday environments. If you crave portability and pocketability above all else, the Z300’s slim profile makes it easy to carry on casual strolls or around a city.
Ergonomically, the XP120’s larger body supports a firmer grip and physical button layout optimized for use with gloves or wet hands. The Z300’s small size makes controls more minimalistic, leaning heavily on touchscreen interaction.
Control Layout and User Interface
Understanding how the cameras facilitate quick and easy control helps assess usability during shoots.
The XP120 offers dedicated buttons for functions like flash modes and exposure settings (though limited in exposure modes), plus a scroll wheel for zoom control. The absence of a viewfinder makes the rear LCD your composing hub. Its buttons are well-sized and spaced, reinforcing its outdoor-friendly ergonomics.
The Z300 heavily relies on its touchscreen interface, which is relatively uncommon for cameras of its era. This enhances interaction but can be challenging in bright daylight and limits tactile feedback. The minimal physical buttons further simplify the body but reduce adaptability when quick adjustments are needed.
Sensor and Image Quality Considerations
The heart of any camera’s image quality lies in its sensor specifications and processing capabilities.
Both cameras utilize the popular 1/2.3" sensor size (measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, ~28 mm² sensor area), but the XP120 employs a more modern 16-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor while the Z300 has a 10-megapixel CCD sensor.
What does this mean in real terms?
-
BSI-CMOS (XP120) benefits:
- Improved low-light sensitivity due to backside illumination
- Faster readout speeds supporting better continuous shooting
- Better dynamic range and color depth potential
-
CCD (Z300) tends to:
- Produce less noise in certain color tones but struggles more at high ISOs
- Have slower processing overall and lower resolution limits
The XP120 covers a resolution up to 4608 x 3456 pixels, offering more cropping flexibility and larger print sizes, while the Z300 maxes out at 3648 x 2736 pixels.
Regarding ISO sensitivity, XP120’s range extends to 3200 native ISO and can boost to 6400, whereas Z300 tops out at ISO 1600 with no boost. For any low-light shooting or indoor use, the XP120 clearly offers a technical edge.
Screen and Viewfinder Experience
Both models lack any electronic or optical viewfinder, relying solely on rear screens for composition.
The XP120's 3.0-inch LCD screen boasts 920k-dot resolution - crisp and bright for an outdoor-use camera. It’s a fixed type without touchscreen support, a tradeoff favoring clarity and daylight visibility over touchscreen convenience.
The Z300 features a same-size 3.0-inch display but with a far lower resolution of 230k dots. It does support touch controls, giving you more interactive options but at the cost of sharpness and visibility in bright conditions.
For framing and reviewing shots, the XP120 offers a more reliable viewing experience in diverse lighting environments. The Z300’s touchscreen helps navigate menus but can be frustrating under strong sunlight.
Autofocus Systems and Shooting Performance
Autofocus speed, accuracy, and continuous shooting capabilities are vital for capturing decisive moments, especially in fast-paced photography genres.
Feature | Fujifilm XP120 | Fujifilm Z300 |
---|---|---|
AF System | Contrast Detection with Face Detection & Tracking | Basic Contrast Detection (No Face Detection) |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single only |
Continuous Shooting Rate | Up to 10 fps | Around 1 fps |
Focus Points | Multi-area & center | Single center |
The XP120’s autofocus features include face detection and tracking capabilities, which significantly improve portrait and travel shots. Its ability to shoot bursts at 10 frames per second also makes it better suited for capturing fleeting action or sudden wildlife moments.
The Z300’s autofocus is basic with a single autofocus mode and no face recognition. Its continuous shooting is slower at around one frame per second, limiting its use for motion or sports photography.
Versatility Across Photography Disciplines
Let's explore how the two cameras perform in key photographic genres, harnessing their technical and functional distinctions.
Portrait Photography
Creating flattering portraits demands good skin tone reproduction, bokeh quality, and reliable eye detection.
-
XP120 Pros:
- 16 MP sensor provides detailed images for large prints
- Face detection AF helps keep eyes sharp
- Slightly wider aperture at f/3.9 assists in background separation at 28mm equivalent focal length
-
Z300 Cons:
- Lower 10 MP resolution limits cropping
- No face detection; slower autofocus can miss fleeting expressions
- Narrower aperture and longer minimum focal length makes subject-background separation less pronounced
Verdict: XP120’s modern AF and sensor technology produce better portrait results with more control over focus and rendition of skin tones.
Landscape Photography
Wide dynamic range and high resolution are essential for expansive, detailed landscapes.
-
Both cameras share a moderate 1/2.3" sensor size, which inherently limits noise performance and dynamic range compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.
-
XP120 has the edge due to:
- Higher resolution for more detail
- Better ISO range for varying light conditions
- Weather sealing ensures reliability outdoors
-
Z300 provides simpler, lower resolution files and no weather resistance - best reserved for fair-weather countryside walks.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Rapid autofocus and burst shooting are critical for unpredictable subjects.
-
The XP120 can shoot 10 fps, with continuous AF and tracking, making it capable of freezing fast-moving animals or sports moments within the limits of its lens and sensor.
-
The Z300 is ill-equipped for action, with 1 fps burst and basic AF, suitable only for static or slow subjects.
Street Photography
Portability and discretion are prized here.
-
Z300 shines for urban street photographers craving lightweight gear and touchscreen controls.
-
XP120’s bulk and rugged design may attract adventure travelers or street shooters in harsh environments but at the cost of subtlety.
Macro Photography
Both cameras offer a 9cm minimum focus distance, adequate for casual macro snaps, like flowers or insects.
-
XP120’s superior sensor and image stabilization improve sharpness.
-
Neither offers focus stacking or manual focus, limiting creative control.
Night and Astrophotography
Advanced sensor performance and high ISO capabilities are necessary here.
-
XP120 supports ISO up to 6400 (boosted), features sensor-shift stabilization, and exposure modes like timelapse, aiding night shots.
-
Z300’s max ISO 1600 and lack of stabilization restrict low-light usability.
Video Capabilities
-
XP120 supports Full HD 1080p video at 60 fps with H.264 compression, offering smooth and detailed footage for vlogs or casual video projects.
-
Z300's maximum video is limited to VGA resolution (640x480) at 30 fps, suitable only for very basic video needs.
Neither camera offers external microphone input or advanced video features, but XP120’s modern codec and stabilization present clear video advantages.
Travel Photography
Considering versatility, battery life, and durability:
-
XP120 is a robust, all-weather companion with rugged sealing and longer battery life (~210 shots).
-
Z300 is lighter and pocket-friendlier but fragile by comparison and with unknown battery endurance.
Professional Use
Neither camera targets professionals, thanks to limited manual controls, absence of RAW, and fixed zoom lenses.
Technical Deep Dive: Build, Battery, and Connectivity
Aspect | Fujifilm XP120 | Fujifilm Z300 |
---|---|---|
Build Quality | Excellent ruggedness: IPX8 waterproof (up to 20m), dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof | Basic plastic body, no environmental sealing |
Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi, USB 2.0, HDMI | USB 2.0 only |
Battery Life | Approx. 210 shots (Battery Pack) | Unknown, uses NP-45 lithium battery |
Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Internal | SD/SDHC + Internal |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (optical) | Sensor-shift |
The XP120 stands out by offering integrated Wi-Fi for wireless image transfer, enhancing your ability to share images quickly on the go - perfect for social media-minded photographers. The Z300 offers no wireless features, requiring cable transfers.
Ruggedness and reliability are especially vital if you shoot outdoors frequently. The XP120’s comprehensive weather resistance certainly adds peace of mind.
Sample Images and Real-World Viewing
Examining JPEGs from both cameras reveals:
-
XP120’s higher resolution and color fidelity result in crisper, more vibrant images, especially in low light or complex scenes.
-
Z300’s images often exhibit softness and higher noise at ISO 400+, alongside underwhelming dynamic range.
Both cameras apply in-camera sharpening and noise reduction that shape overall image character. For casual shooters, XP120’s improved processing translates into better out-of-camera results.
Overall Performance Ratings
While official DxOMark scores are unavailable, hands-on testing and user reviews position the XP120 significantly ahead in image quality, autofocus, and durability. The Z300 holds value primarily for budget users prioritizing ultra-compact form without rugged needs.
Breakdown by Photography Type
- Portraits: XP120 leads clearly (+)
- Landscape: XP120 better in quality and durability (+)
- Wildlife/Sports: XP120 suitable with faster AF and burst (+)
- Street: Z300’s compactness has niche appeal (+)
- Macro: Both equal in capability (±)
- Night/Astro: XP120 only choice (+)
- Video: XP120 supports HD video (+)
- Travel: XP120 preferred for robustness; Z300 for portability (±)
- Professional use: Neither ideal (–)
Who Should Choose Which?
Fujifilm FinePix XP120 - Best For:
- Adventure seekers needing a rugged, waterproof camera that withstands harsh conditions
- Photographers needing better autofocus and burst shooting for casual wildlife or sports
- Buyers seeking a modern sensor with more megapixels and higher ISO range
- Travel shooters wanting Wi-Fi connectivity and long battery life
- Creators interested in Full HD video and basic time-lapse features
Fujifilm FinePix Z300 - Best For:
- Casual snapshot takers prioritizing ultra-compact, lightweight design
- Those who prefer a touchscreen interface for quick menu navigation
- Budget-conscious buyers who want a simple point-and-shoot for daytime photography only
- Photographers with limited needs around image quality, durability, or video
Final Thoughts: Making Your Next Move
When selecting between the Fujifilm XP120 and the Fujifilm Z300, your decision boils down to your personal photography goals and preferred shooting situations.
If you desire a reliable, versatile, and tougher camera that can capture a variety of scenes in challenging conditions, the XP120 is the definitive choice. It’s clearly the more technologically advanced model, offering features and performance that benefit beginners and enthusiasts alike.
The Z300, while dated and limited in capability, remains a lightweight, easy-to-carry point-and-shoot for casual shooters who don’t require durability or high image quality. Just be mindful of its slower operation and weak video support.
Whichever you choose, try to get hands-on with each to understand how their handling fits your style. Consider pairing your camera with compatible accessories like waterproof cases for the Z300 or additional batteries and SD cards for the XP120 to maximize your shooting time.
Ready to start capturing your best memories with confidence? Explore the Fujifilm XP120 if rugged versatility excites you, or consider the Z300 for a simple, portable snapshot companion. Your creative journey awaits!
Fujifilm XP120 vs Fujifilm Z300 Specifications
Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Fujifilm FinePix Z300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Fujifilm FinePix Z300 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2017-01-05 | 2009-06-12 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/3.9-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 9cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 92 x 57 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-45 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple Timer, Group Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $229 | $0 |