Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575
91 Imaging
42 Features
46 Overall
43
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 203g - 110 x 71 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Refreshed by Fujifilm XP130
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Photography Glossary Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Overview
Here is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals FujiFilm and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm XP120 (16MP) and the M575 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm XP120 was manufactured 7 years later than the M575 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm XP120 matches up against the M575 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix XP120 & Kodak EasyShare M575. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP120 Gallery & Kodak M575 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP120 over the Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XP120 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2017 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 86 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Fujifilm XP120
| M575 | Fujifilm XP120 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP120 and Kodak M575
| Fujifilm XP120 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP120 provides external measurements of 110mm x 71mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm XP120 versus the M575.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP120 and M575 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP120 and M575.
As you have seen, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You can anticipate the Fujifilm XP120 to provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm XP120 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm XP120 vs Kodak M575 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M575 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP120 | Kodak EasyShare M575 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2017-01-05 | 2010-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 9cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.40 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p / Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 203g (0.45 pounds) | 152g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 71 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.1") | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, group shot) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $229 | $139 |