Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Launched March 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Lets look closer at the Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm XP200 was revealed 4 years after the SL202 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the SL202 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm XP200 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 50 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm XP200
| SL202 | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm XP200 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm XP200 features external measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 and the SL202.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm XP200 and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm XP200 and SL202.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Fujifilm XP200 to show extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm XP200 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also Known as | - | PL50 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-03-22 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-50A | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $250 | $140 |
