Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Below is a extended analysis of the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm Z35 was brought out 3 years prior to the VR-340 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm Z35 grades against the VR-340 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

				

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Olympus VR-340

 Fujifilm Z35 VR-340 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Fujifilm Z35

 VR-340 Fujifilm Z35 
LaunchedJanuary 2012July 2009More recent by 30 months
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus VR-340

 Fujifilm Z35 VR-340 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm Z35 comes with physical dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Fujifilm Z35 versus Olympus VR-340 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 vs the VR-340.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z35 and VR-340 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through technical specs. The visual here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Z35 and VR-340.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-340 to produce extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm Z35
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-340
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
34
decent MP (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Street photography features
Olympus VR-340 Street photography features
54
lighter than average (125g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm Z35
Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Travel photography info
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography info
56
lighter than average (125g)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
69
lighter than average in class (125g)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Landscape photography camera
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
screen is small (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
43
rather wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Vlogging camera
25
lighter than average (125 grams)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.7)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
33
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm Z35 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Olympus VR-340
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Olympus VR-340
General Information
Brand Name FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Olympus VR-340
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-07-22 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-105mm (3.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focus range 8cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 3 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.10 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-45A LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $130 $130