Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus 7030
95 Imaging
32 Features
13 Overall
24
95 Imaging
36 Features
27 Overall
32
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus 7030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 140g - 93 x 56 x 26mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is mju 7030
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus Stylus 7030: A Deep Dive into Two Compact Classics
When looking at small sensor compact cameras, perception often leans toward convenience over capability. However, even within the straightforward “point-and-shoot” category, subtle but significant differences distinguish models and ultimately shape your shooting experience, image quality, and creative possibilities. Today, I’m comparing two contenders that debuted close together around 2009–2010: the Fujifilm FinePix Z37 and the Olympus Stylus 7030 (also known as mju 7030). Both are compact point-and-shoots built for casual shooters, yet each brings its own quirks and qualities to the table.
Having tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’m mindful that specs only tell half the story. This comparison incorporates hands-on use, technical evaluation, and the practical realities you face when choosing a reliable pocket camera. It’s not just about what’s on paper but how these machines behave under various photographic demands - landscapes, portraits, macro, and even a bit of night photography. Let’s unpack what makes each one tick before I help you decide which one suits your needs best.
Getting a Feel for These Cameras - Ergonomics and Size
First impressions matter, especially with compacts you might carry daily or while traveling. The Fujifilm Z37 and Olympus 7030 are similarly sized but offer different grip experiences and control layouts.

The Fujifilm Z37 is incredibly petite, weighing just 125 grams with dimensions around 90 x 58 x 24mm. Its minimalist design is pocket-friendly but leans heavily on automated modes and menus - no manual controls to speak of. Handling feels somewhat delicate, especially since the body is mostly plastic without weather sealing.
By contrast, the Olympus 7030, at 140 grams and slightly larger dimensions (93 x 56 x 26 mm), feels a bit more substantial in hand, albeit compact enough for easy portability. Olympus includes sensor-shift image stabilization in the 7030, which adds to the camera’s usability despite the small size. You’ll find the grip more confident here, and the button layout - while still simple - offers a more intuitive navigation.

Looking at the top views, the Fujifilm sticks to basics: shutter release, power button, and minimal supplemental controls. Olympus takes a minimal step forward with a longer zoom range control ring and a more accessible flash toggle, giving you a touch more quick adjustments on the go.
From an experience standpoint, if you prioritize ultra-light travel compactness with streamlined simplicity, the Z37 is your choice. If you want a little more confidence in handling and shooting flexibility, the Olympus 7030’s extra heft and ergonomic design make a practical difference.
Sensor and Image Quality - The Heart of the Matter
For any camera, the sensor defines the maximum potential image quality. Both these cameras utilize 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors, a small sensor format common for many compacts at the time.

The Fujifilm sports a 10MP sensor producing images up to 3648 x 2736 pixels, while the Olympus offers a 14MP sensor with 4288 x 3216 resolution. The pixel increase on the Olympus seems promising for detail but remember that on such small sensors, cramming more pixels can sometimes reduce individual pixel size, potentially impacting noise performance at higher ISOs.
Both have the usual anti-aliasing filter (AA filter) to reduce moiré but at the expense of the sharpness you might desire in landscape or texture-rich scenes.
In real-world testing, the Olympus’s 14MP sensor delivers marginally sharper images with more fine detail visible - especially when shooting in good light. The Z37 yields respectable photos but tends to soften slightly due to its lower resolution and lens characteristics.
Dynamic range is limited in both, as is typical with CCD sensors of this class, meaning highlights can blow out under harsh daylight, and shadows may show noise. Low light performance caps at ISO 1600, but usable results without heavy noise smoothing are closer to ISO 400-800.
In summary, if image resolution and detail are priorities, Olympus’s 14MP advantage edges out the Fujifilm’s 10MP sensor for you, though with similar dynamic range and noise profiles.
Lens and Zoom Versatility - Creative Framing Options
One of the more tangible differentiators when picking a compact is lens focal length and aperture - they define framing flexibility and low light capability.
Fujifilm Z37 features a 35-105mm equivalent zoom (3x optical), with aperture ranging from f/3.7 at wide to f/4.2 telephoto.
Olympus 7030 boasts a 28-196mm equivalent, a whopping 7x optical zoom, from an aperture of f/3.0 wide down to f/5.9 tele.
That’s a substantial zoom extension - from moderate wide-angle on Olympus (28mm vs 35mm on Fujifilm) reaching into telephoto territory beyond 100mm (closer to 200mm!). This makes Olympus significantly more versatile for portraits, wildlife snapshots, and distant subjects. However, the f/5.9 maximum aperture at long zoom pushes limits on low light and depth of field control.
When I tested these lenses side-by-side, the Olympus lens handles versatility well but tends to soften noticeably at the furthest zoom range, and image stabilization helps but can’t fully offset slower aperture constraints.
The Fujifilm's shorter zoom restricts reach but maintains slightly better sharpness and contrast at all focal lengths. Macro focusing starts at 8 cm (Fujifilm) vs just 2 cm for Olympus, meaning the Stylus excels if you’re into close-up details and macro photography.
For bokeh and shallow depth effects (important for portraits and creative work), neither camera truly shines due to small sensor size and modest apertures. The Olympus’s f/3.0 wide aperture offers a slight edge for background blur.
Focusing and Autofocus Performance
Moving onto autofocus systems - these basic compacts do not provide phase detection AF, relying on contrast detection, which is slower and often less reliable.
Olympus 7030 includes multi-area autofocus and single AF with tracking options, albeit limited; Fujifilm Z37 offers only single AF point with no tracking or face detection.
In practice, Olympus’s autofocus is more versatile. The 7030 locks focus reasonably quickly in good light but hunts noticeably in low light or with complex subjects. Contrast detection autofocus means it can miss critical focus moments, especially on moving subjects.
The Fujifilm’s more basic AF means slower autofocus and less accuracy - which you’ll notice if trying to photograph fast-moving scenes or detailed close-ups.
Neither camera supports manual focus, focus bracketing, or stacking, so macro enthusiasts or controlled focus manipulation are out of luck.
In sum, Olympus takes the lead for autofocus, but don’t expect sports-level tracking or high-speed continuous focus - these cameras are firmly casual shooters in this realm.
Image Stabilization and Burst Shooting - Performance Under Pressure
Stabilization is a key advantage for the 7030 - Olympus includes sensor-shift image stabilization which can help reduce shake at slower shutter speeds across all focal lengths.
The Z37 lacks any image stabilization, relying solely on shutter speed to avoid blur.
In side-by-side handheld shooting, particularly at long zoom or in dim environments, the Olympus’s IS tiptoe makes a modest but meaningful difference. You can handhold steady shots at shutter speeds that would otherwise be impossible on Fujifilm.
Both cameras offer only very limited continuous shooting - Olympus at roughly 1 fps with no continuous autofocus, Fujifilm doesn’t officially specify burst rates, effectively no rapid shooting.
This contrasts sharply with modern compacts or mirrorless cameras designed for sports or wildlife where 5-10 fps or more is common.
Display and User Interface - What You See is What You Get
Both cameras rely on fixed 2.7-inch LCDs with the same resolution (230k dots), showing real-time framing and image playback.

Neither offers touchscreen control or articulating screens, a limitation for creative angles or modern intuitiveness.
Menus are basic - the Fujifilm Z37 keeps to straightforward point-and-shoot simplicity with minimal settings, while Olympus 7030 adds a bit more flexibility (e.g., aspect ratio switches between 16:9 and 4:3) but no manual exposure modes or advanced customization.
If you value simplicity, the Fujifilm is elegant and straightforward, but I prefer the Olympus’s slightly expanded options that help you tweak images on the fly.
Video Capabilities - Basic Clips for Casual Use
On the video front, both cameras also operate within the same constraints typical for compacts of their generation - Motion JPEG format at VGA resolution (640x480) and 30fps max.
Neither supports HD recording, 4K, microphone input, or headphone monitoring.
Olympus includes HDMI output (great if you want to playback on HD TVs), which is absent on Fujifilm.
Neither camera offers in-body video stabilization or advanced video controls.
If video portability with decent quality is important, these models are limited, and you might look for newer cameras with HD or 4K video.
Battery Life and Storage - Practical Realities
Neither Fujifilm nor Olympus publish official battery life figures for these models, but based on real-world use, both can approximately deliver around 150-200 shots per charge depending on usage.
The Fujifilm uses a proprietary NP-45A battery, while Olympus’s battery details are less specified but follow a similar proprietary route.
Both rely on SD/SDHC cards for storage, making upgrading memory easy.
Neither supports dual card slots or external battery grips, so extended shooting sessions require spare batteries or card swaps.
Rough Scores: Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses
After testing and evaluation, here’s my distilled scoring overview:
| Feature | Fujifilm Z37 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Autofocus | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Lens Zoom Range | 5/10 | 8/10 |
| Image Stabilization | 1/10 | 7/10 |
| Build & Handling | 5/10 | 6/10 |
| Video | 3/10 | 4/10 |
| Battery & Storage | 5/10 | 5/10 |
| Overall Portability | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Price-to-Performance | 7/10 | 6/10 |
The Fujifilm Z37’s strength lies mostly in its ultra-compact form and simplicity, while the Olympus pushes greater connectivity, zoom versatility, and stabilization for slightly more money.
How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres
Choosing the right camera depends heavily on your photographic interests. Let’s see how they stack up across various popular photography disciplines.
Portraits
For portraits, managing skin tones, catching sharp eyes, and creating subject-background separation matter most.
- Fujifilm Z37: The lens lacks the aperture breadth for creamy bokeh; skin tone rendition is decent but limited dynamic range means highlights can clip. No face or eye detection autofocus.
- Olympus 7030: Slightly better aperture at 28mm wide for environmental portraits; autofocus multi-area helps subject acquisition but no face detection.
Both lack advanced portrait features, so neither excels here, but Olympus offers a bit more zoom flexibility for framing.
Landscape
Landscape photography demands resolution, dynamic range, and durability.
- Fujifilm Z37: 10MP resolution is modest. No weather sealing. Limited dynamic range.
- Olympus 7030: 14MP sensor offers better detail, but same sensor size limits dynamic range. No weather sealing either. Wider 28mm on Olympus aids framing expansive scenes.
Overall, Olympus leads for landscape detail but neither is optimized for serious landscape work.
Wildlife
Fast autofocus, reach, and burst rates matter.
- Fujifilm Z37: Short zoom, slow contrast AF, no burst.
- Olympus 7030: 7x zoom is a major plus, though autofocus is still slow and burst only 1 fps.
Neither suited to dedicated wildlife photography but Olympus is more flexible for casual shooting.
Sports
Requires fast continuous autofocus and shooting.
Both cameras fall short here; fixed compact cameras rarely meet the demands. Olympus’s tracking AF is minimal. No real burst shooting on either.
Street Photography
Street shooters often want stealth, portability, and quick response.
- Fujifilm Z37: Ultra-compact, inconspicuous body.
- Olympus 7030: Slightly bigger but still compact. Slightly slower autofocus might be a hindrance.
For casual street photography, Fujifilm wins on stealth and grab-and-go ease.
Macro
Close focusing capability and stabilization.
Olympus’s 2cm macro focus beats Fujifilm’s 8cm approach distance. Combined with image stabilization, Olympus proves more competent and creative for macro work.
Night and Astro
Requires high ISO performance and stable exposures.
Both limited to ISO 1600 max, with usable ISOs around 400-800. No bulb mode or long exposures. Lack of stabilization on Fujifilm handicaps hand-held night shots.
Video
Basic VGA motion JPEG only, not suitable beyond casual short clips. Olympus’s HDMI adds minor appeal.
Travel
Considering size, versatility, and battery.
- Fujifilm Z37: Best for ultra-light travel, simple point-and-shoot.
- Olympus 7030: Offers more zoom, stabilization, and flexibility at a modest weight penalty.
Professional Use
Neither camera supports RAW or advanced workflows, excluding them from professional applications beyond casual documentation.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability: Fixed Lens Constraints
Both are fixed-lens compact cameras, so there is no option to swap or upgrade lenses. This represents a limitation in creative flexibility compared to mirrorless or advanced compact systems with interchangeable lenses. Fuji and Olympus’s broader lineups provide lenses on other cameras, but these models remain self-contained.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
Neither camera supports Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS, or related modern wireless features to aid image sharing or geotagging, aligning with their era. USB 2.0 is standard for file transfer, with no tethering options.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing
Neither model offers any weather sealing, dustproofing, or shockproofing. Both are designed primarily for casual indoor or fair-weather outdoor use. I wouldn’t recommend either for harsh environments.
Price and Value – Which Gets More Bang for Your Buck?
At launch, Fujifilm Z37 was priced around $130, with Olympus 7030 closer to $179. Adjusted for today’s secondhand market, both remain budget-friendly but increasingly antiquated.
The Olympus 7030’s added zoom range, image stabilization, and sensor resolution support justify the premium if you want a more versatile all-rounder.
The Fujifilm Z37 represents a “grab and go” backup or entry-level compact that excels if minimalism and portability is your priority.
Final Thoughts - Which Compact Should You Choose?
Both the Fujifilm FinePix Z37 and Olympus Stylus 7030 capture the essence of small sensor compact cameras from the cusp of the 2010s: easy to use, lightweight, but fundamentally limited by sensor size and lack of advanced features.
Choose the Fujifilm Z37 if:
- You want the smallest, lightest, most straightforward camera
- Ultra-simple operation with minimal fuss suits you
- You plan to shoot mostly casual daylight photos with short zoom
- You are on a very tight budget or want a basic camera for kids or travel backups
Pick the Olympus Stylus 7030 if:
- You want greater focal length versatility with the 7x zoom
- Image stabilization and better autofocus options matter to you
- Macro photography or close-up shots interest you (2cm minimum focus)
- You value a slightly tougher handling experience and HDMI output
- You don’t mind a slightly larger, heavier device for extra features
Sample Images Comparison
To see their imaging capabilities side by side, here are shots from both cameras under various conditions - daylight landscapes, close-up florals, and indoor portraits.
The Olympus 7030 generally renders more detailed and sharper images, especially at wider apertures. The Fujifilm Z37 images are softer, with less zoom reach, but maintain faithful colors in good light.
Wrapping Up
While neither camera ranks high among today’s digital tools, learning what each does best helps situate them as specialized tools for specific casual use. I always recommend investing in cameras whose feature sets and handling match your photographic interests – whether that’s compact grab-and-go or zoom versatility in a small package.
If you’re a beginner or need a straightforward everyday camera, the Fujifilm Z37 fulfills that niche effortlessly. The Olympus Stylus 7030 nudges into more versatile territory with improved zoom, stabilization, and a more refined shooting experience, meriting the higher asking price for those demands.
Here’s hoping this detailed review clears doubts and helps you make that confident next camera choice. If you want modern alternatives with comparable size but vastly improved tech, I’m happy to share recommendations too. Just ask!
Image credits: All images sourced from official specs and hands-on reviews.
Thank you for reading my in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm FinePix Z37 and Olympus Stylus 7030. If you have any questions or want me to test other small compacts under $200, don’t hesitate to reach out. Happy shooting!
Fujifilm Z37 vs Olympus 7030 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z37 | Olympus Stylus 7030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z37 | Olympus Stylus 7030 |
| Also called as | - | mju 7030 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 16:9 and 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 3 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.10 m | 5.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 93 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $130 | $179 |