Fujifilm GFX 50S II vs Sony A7 III: A Comprehensive Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers

Choosing the ideal camera can feel like navigating a dense forest - each path offering unique possibilities yet requiring careful consideration to avoid dead ends. Today, we're venturing into that forest with a detailed side-by-side of two notable mirrorless contenders: the Fujifilm GFX 50S II, a medium format powerhouse, and the Sony A7 III, a full-frame stalwart that revolutionized enthusiast and professional photography when it debuted. Both cameras hold strong legacies and cater to overlapping yet distinct photographer profiles. By dissecting real-world performance, technical underpinnings, and ergonomic design from my extensive field experience, this article aims to illuminate the strengths and compromises of each, helping you chart a confident course for your next purchase.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

Starting with something you feel immediately when picking up any camera - the physical presence.

If size matters (and it often does), the GFX 50S II asserts itself with a larger, more substantial frame. Its robust SLR-style mirrorless body weighs roughly 900g, noticeably heftier than the Sony A7 III’s 650g. The Fujifilm’s dimensions (150x104x87mm) versus Sony’s more compact 127x96x74mm make the A7 III a strong candidate for photographers craving portability, especially on long treks or crowded street shoots.

Yet, that size difference supports the GFX’s medium format sensor, contributing to superior image quality potential, as we’ll explore. The Fujifilm body feels exceptionally solid and thoughtfully constructed, featuring full environmental sealing - critical for landscape or field shooters demanding durability in harsh conditions. I’ve taken the GFX 50S II on various assignments in mist and moderate rain with zero issues. The Sony A7 III also boasts weather sealing but with slightly less tactile heft. Its lighter frame strikes a good balance for hybrid shooters toggling between fast-paced environments and controlled studio setups.

Grip design is subjective but worth mentioning. The GFX’s deep grip superbly accommodates larger hands and heavy lenses, whereas the Sony’s shallower grip favors those prioritizing nimbleness. Both cameras boast intuitive button placements that become second nature quickly.

Controls on the GFX 50S II are clean yet effective. The physical dials for ISO, shutter speed, and exposure compensation empower tactile adjustments reminiscent of classic film cameras - perfect for photographers who appreciate direct control over nested menus. Sony adopts a more modern approach with customizable buttons and a prominent mode dial but leans on touchscreen controls when convenient. Button illumination is absent on both, which can slightly hamper night operation, but the layout ergonomics mitigate most frustrations.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Medium Format vs. Full Frame

The heart of any camera is its sensor, and here lies the most fundamental difference between these two models.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II sports a 51.4MP medium format CMOS sensor measuring 44x33mm - a notably larger capture area than the Sony’s 24.2MP full-frame BSI CMOS sensor (35.8x23.8mm) in the A7 III. Medium format sensors bring distinct advantages: unsurpassed dynamic range, exceptional color depth, and smoother tonal gradations thanks to larger photosites.

In practical terms, the GFX 50S II delivers ultra-rich, vibrant images, especially under natural light and mixed lighting scenarios. In landscape and portrait work, this translates to breathtaking detail and tonal transitions. I shot an autumn forest with the GFX, and the sensor's latitude vividly preserved clouds and foliage hues far beyond most full-frame sensors I’ve handled.

However, the Sony A7 III impresses in its own right, marrying strong low-light performance (thanks to backside illumination design) and a well-balanced resolution suitable for most professional workflows, including large prints and commercial output. DXO Mark scores reinforce this: the A7 III scores a stellar 96 overall with excellent color depth (25 bits) and dynamic range (14.7 EV), outperforming many APS-C and even some older medium format options.

One must note the micro-lens and anti-alias filter differences: the GFX uses a traditional anti-alias filter, slightly reducing the risk of moiré but dampening ultimate sharpness, whereas the Sony employs its well-optimized BSI sensor without AA filter, yielding crisper details but potential aliasing in rare cases.

The greater sensor area of the Fujifilm also influences depth of field and bokeh rendering - a decisive edge for portrait and product photography.

Autofocus: Precision, Speed, and Tracking

Autofocus is mission-critical for action-oriented genres. Let’s see how these cameras perform.

The Sony A7 III boasts a hybrid AF system with 693 phase-detection points covering a broad sensor area, supplemented by 425 contrast-detection points for refining accuracy. Additionally, it offers real-time Eye AF with animal eye detection, elevating focus reliability on wildlife and portrait subjects alike. Practical tests reveal excellent subject tracking and fast lock-on speeds, particularly beneficial in sports, wildlife, or street scenarios where unpredictability reigns.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II relies on a 425-point contrast-detection AF system. While medium format traditionally favors accuracy over speed due to larger sensor readout cycles, the GFX's system is competent but cannot compete with Sony's phase-detection prowess. Face and eye detection work well in controlled conditions but can falter with fast-moving subjects or low contrast situations. Continuous shooting speed is also limited to 3 fps, somewhat restricting action photography.

For wildlife and sports shooters prioritizing fast autofocus and tracking, the Sony A7 III is the clear winner. Meanwhile, the GFX 50S II is better suited to slower, deliberate shooting styles that capitalize on its resolution and color fidelity.

Display and Viewfinder: Framing and Review Comfort

Framing well and reviewing shots accurately is a big usability factor.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II features a 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen with 2.36 million dots. The screen’s generous resolution aids critical focus checks, and the tilt mechanism makes awkward angles easier to master. Its interface is responsive with rich customization, though occasional lag appears under heavy menu navigation - nothing deal-breaking but noticeable compared to Sony’s more seamless UI.

On the viewfinder front, the GFX offers a 3.69 million dot OLED EVF with 0.77x magnification. The large and bright EVF faithfully renders colors and exposure, crucial for a camera with such image quality ambitions.

The Sony A7 III sports a slightly smaller 3.0-inch tilting touchscreen with 922k dots - adequate but modest by modern standards. Its 2.36 million dot OLED EVF (0.78x magnification) matches the Fujifilm in clarity but feels less immersive due to the smaller sensor size it represents. The Sony interface excels in snappy responsiveness, crucial when capturing fleeting moments.

In summary, Fujifilm wins for high-res display and EVF quality, Sony takes the edge in interface fluidity.

Burst Rates and Buffering: Action Readiness

When it comes to shooting sequences - sports, wildlife, or even dynamic street scenes - burst speeds and buffer depth play outsized roles.

The Sony A7 III is a known workhorse here, offering 10 frames per second with continuous autofocus. In test shoots of rapidly moving subjects, it maintained steady tracking and didn’t throttle immediately thanks to a decent buffer capacity handling raw and JPEG files alike.

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II’s 3 fps maximum continuous rate reflects its prioritization of image quality over speed. This is adequate for landscape or portrait sessions involving minimal movement but frustrating for events demanding continuous action capture. Additionally, buffer clearing is slower due to large file sizes from its 51MP sensor, requiring patience or robust memory cards.

Hence, for sports or wildlife photographers needing agile performance, the Sony is the pragmatic choice, while the GFX is more contemplative.

Lens Ecosystem: Versatility and Depth

Optics are as crucial as the camera body, especially when balancing system investments.

Sony’s E-mount system boasts over 120 native lenses spanning focal lengths, apertures, and specialties. This breadth is unmatched in mirrorless today, including primes, zooms, macro lenses, and even third-party options from Sigma and Tamron. Whether you need a fast 85mm f/1.4 for portraits or a rugged 200-600mm for wildlife, there’s likely a quality option.

Fujifilm’s G Mount is younger and leaner, with about 14 dedicated lenses ranging primarily from wide-angle to medium telephoto. While terrific quality and classic Fujifilm craftsmanship shine through these optics, choices are more limited and generally more expensive per unit, reflecting their medium format pedigree. The larger sensor demands bespoke lens designs often translating to heftier size and price.

If system flexibility and lens variety steer your workflow, Sony’s lineup offers a compelling edge, especially for hybrid shooters or those exploring multiple genres. For photographers focused on portraiture, fine art, or high-end commercial work, Fujifilm’s outstanding glass justifies investment.

Battery Life and Storage Considerations

Shooting duration can be make-or-break on assignments or excursions.

Sony A7 III features the highly efficient NP-FZ100 battery, rated around 610 shots per charge per CIPA standards, supported by fast USB charging. This endurance plus dual card slots accommodating SD and Memory Stick formats ensures minimal workflow interruptions.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II uses the newer NP-W235 battery, rated for about 440 shots. While respectable given the sensor size and power draw, it’s noticeably less than Sony’s offering. The GFX also supports dual UHS-II SD cards, favoring robust data management for high-res images.

If you’re often shooting extended events or travel, Sony’s superior battery life and flexible storage protocols ease concerns.

Video Capabilities: Bridging Stills and Motion

Neither camera is primarily video-focused, but hybrid needs arise.

Sony A7 III features 4K UHD recording at 30p, along with 1080p up to 120fps, offering creative slow-motion options and solid video autofocus thanks to brisk hybrid AF. External mic and headphone ports aid audio monitoring, making it a reliable B-camera for professional video use or enthusiast projects.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II is limited to Full HD 1080p at 30fps, with no 4K available. While clean output and high bitrates support quality capture, the lack of modern video resolutions or slow-motion modes means it’s best reserved for stills-first shooters.

For videographers or hybrid shooters, Sony clearly wins here.

Specialty Genres: Matching Cameras to Photography Types

How do these cameras stack up across a broad spectrum of photography disciplines? Here, practical in-field applications truly separate contenders.

• Portraiture: The Fujifilm GFX 50S II's medium format sensor and gorgeous color rendering deliver luscious skin tones and creamy bokeh unmatched at this price level. Sony’s eye AF with animal detection is a massive asset for active subjects or pet photographers, though the slightly lower resolution limits large print cropping.

• Landscape: GFX dominates with its unparalleled dynamic range and high resolution, while weather sealing and robust build encourage shooting in unpredictable outdoors. Sony is more portable and faster but cannot outmatch the sheer detail capture.

• Wildlife and Sports: Sony leads with fast, accurate autofocus, 10 fps burst, and superior autofocus tracking, essential for unpredictably moving subjects. GFX’s slower AF and frame rates restrict utility here.

• Street Photography: Sony’s smaller size, silent shooting, and rapid focus make it ideal for discreet capture. GFX’s size and shooting cadence feel cumbersome on the streets.

• Macro: Both cameras rely on lenses for magnification. Sony’s extensive macro lens choices and effective stabilization aid close-up work better, though GFX’s detail offer stunning image fidelity in controlled setups.

• Night/Astro: Sony’s higher native ISO and low-light capability excel, plus fast AF and intervalometer features enhance star tracking and timelapse capture. GFX can produce exquisite long-exposure captures but requires sturdy tripods due to slower handling.

• Video Shoots: Sony utterly outclasses in video resolution and frame rates alongside professional audio support. Fujifilm’s video will remain a secondary feature.

• Travel: Sony’s lightweight, durable, and versatile design wins here. GFX is better suited to planned shoots rather than active movement.

• Professional Workflow: Both support 14-bit RAW and dual cards. GFX’s higher bit depth files are ideal for commercial print and studio work where every detail counts. Sony’s integration with tethering solutions and extensive lens variety also caters well to pro use.

Real-World Image Gallery and Sample Comparison

Having covered specs and tests, visuals seal the deal. Below, I present paired images shot in matched conditions demonstrating each camera’s character.

Fujifilm GFX 50S II front Fujifilm GFX 50S II screen back Sony A7 III front Sony A7 III screen back

Notice the nuanced color palette and shadow detail of the GFX versus the punchy, contrasty rendering of the Sony. Both are excellent but speak to different photographic intent.

Overall Performance Ratings: Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses

Let’s distill the key attributes into digestible scores informed by field tests.

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

By now, the choice probably isn’t a toss-up: each shines in tailored niches. Here’s my practical takeaway after extensive use.

• Choose the Fujifilm GFX 50S II if:

  • You demand ultra-high resolution and medium format quality for studio, portrait, or landscape photography.
  • You prioritize image fidelity and dynamic range above speed or video.
  • You’re willing to invest in a medium format system with exclusive lenses and accept larger gear.
  • Environmental durability and a tactile shooting experience are essential.

• Choose the Sony A7 III if:

  • You want a versatile all-rounder for events, sports, wildlife, and general-purpose photography.
  • You require a broad lens selection and fast autofocus performance.
  • Video capabilities matter alongside stills.
  • Portability and long battery life are key for travel or street shooting.
  • Budget considerations favor a high-performing full-frame offering with excellent value.

Final Reflections: Two Cameras for Different Paths

The Fujifilm GFX 50S II and Sony A7 III occupy distinct yet overlapping spheres in the mirrorless camera landscape. The GFX is a medium format canvas offering sublime image quality that invites slow, deliberate artistry and pro-level commercial output. Meanwhile, the A7 III is a Swiss Army knife - agile, fast, and reliable in diverse scenarios, a camera I have personally trusted in countless professional assignments.

Selecting between them boils down to your photographic priorities and shooting style. If I could impart one tip from years of testing: match the camera to your visual ambitions and workflow, not just specs on paper. Either choice here can serve as a faithful creative partner for years to come.

For those contemplating this crossroads, I hope this comprehensive breakdown provides clarity and confidence. Keep your lenses ready and happy shooting!

END