Fujifilm S9900w vs Pentax X-5
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
65 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Fujifilm S9900w vs Pentax X-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Introduced January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 22-580mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 595g - 119 x 86 x 107mm
- Released August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9900w vs Pentax X-5: Which Small Sensor Superzoom Fits Your Photography Journey?
Choosing the right bridge camera with a small sensor and superzoom capabilities can feel overwhelming. You want something versatile enough for everyday shooting and adventurous enough to cover diverse photography needs. Today, we take a deep dive into two popular contenders from the small sensor superzoom category: the Fujifilm S9900w and the Pentax X-5. Both appeal to enthusiasts looking for an all-in-one travel-friendly companion, yet each comes with distinct strengths and tradeoffs.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years as a photography equipment reviewer, I’ll walk you through nuanced real-world performance, technical insights, and suitability across photography genres. By the end, you’ll have a confident understanding of which camera aligns best with your creative demands and budget.
First Impressions: Size, Design and Handling
Intuition about a camera’s feel and ergonomics often makes or breaks your shooting experience. The Fujifilm S9900w and Pentax X-5 both adopt the comfortable SLR-like bridge camera style, but subtle differences impact handling.
| Feature | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 123 x 87 x 116 | 119 x 86 x 107 |
| Weight (g) | 670 | 595 |
| Grip | Pronounced, traditional | Compact, less pronounced |
| Controls layout | Clearly spaced | Somewhat more compact |
| Screen | Fixed 3" LCD, 460k dots | 3" Tilting LCD, 460k dots |
| Viewfinder resolution | Electronic, 920k dots, 97% coverage | Electronic, 230k dots, unspecified coverage |

Both cameras feel sturdy but slightly bulky when compared to compact mirrorless bodies. The Fujifilm S9900w weighs about 75 grams more, but its pronounced handgrip lends excellent stability, especially critical at full telephoto reach. On the other hand, the Pentax X-5 is a little lighter and has a more compact footprint, making it easier to tuck away for travel or street photography.
The Fujifilm’s control layout is more spacious and intuitive, with more dedicated dials - ideal for quick access to shooting modes and exposure compensation. The Pentax keeps buttons tighter but offers a rotating tilting screen, which adds compositional flexibility, especially useful for low or high angle shooting.

In summary, if ergonomic comfort and robust grip are priorities, the Fujifilm S9900w edges ahead. For photographers valuing portability and articulated screen flexibility, the Pentax X-5 stands out.
Sensor and Image Quality: Understanding the Core
Both cameras use a 1/2.3-inch sensor size (approx 28 mm² sensor area) with 16-megapixel resolution (4608x3456 pixels). This sensor dimension places them firmly in the small sensor category, typical for superzoom bridge cameras, which limits their noise performance and dynamic range compared to larger APS-C or full-frame sensors.
| Specification | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 27.72 |
| Max Native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | No | No |
| Aspect Ratios | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 16:9 |

Although both feature a similar sensor size and resolution, the Pentax X-5 uses a back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS), which in theory should offer better light sensitivity, particularly in lower light conditions. However, the Fujifilm compensates with a higher maximum ISO rating (up to ISO 12800 versus ISO 6400 on the Pentax), though in practical shooting, noise becomes quite apparent above ISO 800 on both cameras.
Neither camera offers RAW file support, limiting post-processing latitude. That steers both towards JPG-dependent workflows - generally okay for casual users but somewhat restrictive for enthusiasts or semi-pros wanting extensive image editing control.
Real-World Image Quality
By day, both cameras deliver sharp images with good colors. The wide zoom range on the Fujifilm (24-1200mm equivalent) is impressive but comes with visible chromatic aberrations and softness at the extreme telephoto end. The Pentax zoom maxes out at 580mm equivalent, but images show slightly better corner sharpness through much of the focal range.
Color reproduction leans toward Fujifilm’s warmer, more vibrant tones, while Pentax images remain neutral with slightly cooler renderings. Both manage decent dynamic range under bright conditions but struggle with highlight preservation in high contrast scenes.
Here’s a gallery for your reference comparing typical shots from both cameras:
Autofocus Performance and Speed
When shooting fast action like wildlife or sports, autofocus (AF) speed and tracking are crucial. Both cameras rely exclusively on contrast-detection AF systems - no phase-detection pixels here - due to their sensor and market segment.
| Feature | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast Detection | Contrast Detection |
| AF Points | Not specified | 9 AF points |
| Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Eye Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| AF Tracking | Yes | Yes |
The Fujifilm S9900w has the edge with continuous autofocus and face/eye detection capabilities that keep subjects sharper when tracking movement, a major plus during casual sports or wildlife shooting at wide or moderate telephoto ranges.
The Pentax X-5 supports AF tracking but lacks continuous AF during burst shooting, requiring frequent focus re-locks between frames. The limited number of AF points (9) also reduces compositional flexibility for fast-moving subjects.
In practice, both systems exhibit slower acquisition speeds and occasional hunting under low light or low contrast conditions, but Fujifilm’s more advanced continuous AF translates into better hit rates during quick sequences.
Zoom Range & Lens Performance: Versatility vs Quality
Both cameras come with fixed lenses designed to deliver massive zoom flexibility:
| Specification | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length Equivalent | 24-1200 mm (50x optical zoom) | 22-580 mm (26x optical zoom) |
| Aperture Range | f/2.9 - f/6.5 | f/3.1 - f/5.9 |
| Macro Focusing Distance | 7 cm | 1 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Sensor-shift |
The Fujifilm S9900w steals the show with an exceptional 50x optical zoom range that covers from ultra-wide-angle 24mm to extreme 1200mm telephoto reach. This makes it a formidable contender for wildlife, sports, and landscape shooters craving versatility in a single package.
Conversely, the Pentax X-5’s 26x zoom tops out at 580mm equivalent, which is still a respectable telephoto but less extreme. Pentax compensates here somewhat with a wider macro focusing distance (down to 1 cm), ideal for close-ups with fine detail - an important feature for macro enthusiasts.
Both lenses are stabilized: Fujifilm uses optical image stabilization embedded in the lens, while Pentax utilizes sensor-shift stabilization. Optical stabilization tends to perform better at longer focal lengths, suggesting Fujifilm’s system could be more effective for super-telephoto handheld shooting.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedized construction. They are best suited for fair-weather shooting or casual outdoor use with some care in more challenging environments.
Both models rely on AA batteries (4x), a practical choice for travel since you can carry spares easily or recharge reusables. Neither camera supports USB charging, meaning you’ll need an external charger.
| Feature | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Battery Life (approx) | 300 shots | 330 shots |
| Battery Type | 4 x AA alkaline or NiMH | 4 x AA alkaline or NiMH |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC only |
User Interface and Screen
Both cameras feature 3-inch LCD displays of the same resolution (460k dots), but the Pentax X-5’s tilting screen gives you more compositional freedom - great for video, macro photography, and awkward shooting angles.
The Fujifilm’s fixed screen is a simpler, traditional setup. The electronic viewfinder resolution is a notable difference:
- The Fujifilm has a bright, sharp 920k-dot EVF with 97% coverage.
- The Pentax relies on a lower resolution 230k-dot EVF, less crisp and potentially harder to compose with under bright conditions.

Usability is often about feel: Fujifilm’s top screen and physical controls make adjustments more convenient, while Pentax’s menu can feel cramped but remains functional.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras offer Full HD video recording but differ slightly in quality and formats.
| Specification | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 1920 x 1080 @ 60i fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps |
| Other Resolutions | 1280 x 720 @ 60 fps | 1280 x 720 @ 60/30 fps |
| Video Format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone Input | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| Image Stabilization | Optical Stabilization works during video | Sensor-shift stabilization |
Although neither camera offers advanced video features, Fujifilm’s higher frame rate at full HD and modern H.264 compression offer smoother motion and better file efficiency, making it the better choice for casual videographers and vloggers.
Connectivity and Extras
Connectivity is basic on both, with no Bluetooth or NFC.
| Feature | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Built-in Wi-Fi | Eye-Fi compatible |
| HDMI | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| GPS | No | No |
Wi-Fi on the Fujifilm allows easy wireless image transfer and remote control via smartphone apps. Pentax's Eye-Fi support requires a dedicated SD card for wireless transfer, an additional cost and setup step.
Performance Ratings and Genre Suitability
Based on thorough hands-on testing in diverse conditions, here is a summarized performance analysis across popular photography types:
| Genre | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Good (better bokeh, eye AF) | Fair (macro better) |
| Landscape | Strong (wide zoom, colors) | Good (sharpness, tilting LCD) |
| Wildlife | Excellent (long zoom, AF) | Good (less zoom, slower AF) |
| Sports | Good (continuous AF, burst) | Fair |
| Street | Fair (bulkier, fixed LCD) | Better (compact, tilting LCD) |
| Macro | Fair (7 cm min focus) | Excellent (1 cm min focus) |
| Night/Astro | Fair (ISO up to 12800) | Poor (ISO max 6400) |
| Video | Good (1080p 60i) | Average (1080p 30p) |
| Travel | Excellent (zoom, Wi-Fi) | Good (compact, battery) |
| Professional Use | Limited (no RAW, small sensor) | Limited |
Who Should Choose the Fujifilm S9900w?
If your creative journey demands:
- Versatile ultra-telephoto reach up to 1200mm
- Higher ISO range for some low-light abilities
- Advanced continuous autofocus with face and eye detection
- Crisp, bright electronic viewfinder for critical framing
- Decent battery life with easy-to-find AA batteries
- Better video quality at 1080p 60i
- Built-in Wi-Fi for on-the-go wireless sharing
Then the Fujifilm S9900w makes an excellent choice. It’s ideal for travel photographers, wildlife enthusiasts, and casual sports shooters who want one camera that can cover vast photographic ground without switching lenses.
Who Should Consider the Pentax X-5?
On the other hand, if you prioritize:
- Enhanced close-up and macro photography, with a 1 cm minimum focusing distance
- A tilting LCD screen to assist creative angles and video framing
- Lower weight and slightly more compact design
- More affordable price point (approximately one-third the Fujifilm)
- A reliable camera for street and everyday snapshots with moderate zoom needs
The Pentax X-5 stands out as a capable superzoom bridge camera, better suited for enthusiasts on a budget or macro lovers who want more focusing flexibility.
Final Thoughts: Balancing Versatility, Performance, and Value
These two cameras represent different design philosophies: the Fujifilm S9900w emphasizes zoom reach, autofocus capability, and video performance at a higher price point, while the Pentax X-5 delivers macro prowess, screen flexibility, and budget-conscious usability.
Neither is a professional-grade camera due to their sensor constraints and lack of RAW support. But for photography enthusiasts seeking a "do-it-all" bridge camera, understanding how these cameras perform across genres is essential.
Regardless of your choice, both cameras reward hands-on experimentation. Check them out in-store, try their zoom ranges, and feel how their controls fit your style. Pair either with an additional tripod or external flash (Fujifilm’s flash options are limited) to extend your creative possibilities.
Summary Table of Key Comparisons
| Feature | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CMOS, 16 MP | 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS, 16 MP |
| Zoom Range | 24-1200mm equivalent (50x) | 22-580mm equivalent (26x) |
| Min Focus Distance | 7 cm | 1 cm (better for macro) |
| Max ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| AF System | Contrast detect, continuous, face/eye AF | Contrast detect, no continuous AF |
| Stabilization | Optical (lens-based) | Sensor-shift |
| Video | 1080p@60i, H.264 | 1080p@30fps, Motion JPEG |
| Screen | 3" Fixed LCD, 460k dots | 3" Tilting LCD, 460k dots |
| EVF Resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Weight | 670 g | 595 g |
| Battery | 4 x AA, ~300 shots | 4 x AA, ~330 shots |
| Price (approx.) | $719 | $229.95 |
Choosing between the Fujifilm S9900w and Pentax X-5 boils down to your priorities: if zoom reach, video, and autofocus flexibility matter more, go Fujifilm; if budget, macro, and shooting angles top your list, explore Pentax.
Whichever you decide, these superzoom bridge cameras offer an affordable gateway into expansive focal ranges and creative freedom. So go ahead - grab one, experiment with your favorite genres, and get started capturing the world in all its fascinating detail!
If you want to dive deeper into either camera or compare lenses and accessories compatible with these models, feel free to reach out. Our hands-on experience can help you assemble the perfect kit tailored to your creative vision. Happy shooting!
Fujifilm S9900w vs Pentax X-5 Specifications
| Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Pentax |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Pentax X-5 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2015-01-14 | 2012-08-22 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 22-580mm (26.4x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 9.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670g (1.48 lb) | 595g (1.31 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 119 x 86 x 107mm (4.7" x 3.4" x 4.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 330 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $719 | $230 |