Fujifilm X-A10 vs Olympus E-PL1
86 Imaging
60 Features
66 Overall
62


86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 331g - 117 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced December 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Olympus PEN E-PL1: An In-Depth Mirrorless Camera Comparison for Your Creative Journey
When choosing your next camera, weighing the strengths and limitations of each model is vital to ensure it fits your creative needs and shooting style. Today, we explore two entry-level rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras from FujiFilm and Olympus: the Fujifilm X-A10 (announced late 2016) and the Olympus PEN E-PL1 (released mid-2010). Both serve as accessible gateways into interchangeable lens photography but come from distinct sensor generations and design philosophies.
In this detailed comparison, drawn from technical specifications, hands-on experience, and real-world usage, we’ll guide you through everything you need to know - from sensor performance and autofocus to ergonomics and video features. Whether you prioritize portraits, landscapes, street photography, or vlog content, this guide will help you find your ideal fit.
Getting to Know the Contenders: A Quick Specs Table
Feature | Fujifilm X-A10 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | APS-C CMOS | Four Thirds CMOS |
Sensor Size | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 17.3 x 13 mm |
Resolution | 16 MP | 12 MP |
ISO Range | 200 – 6400 (expandable to 100-25600) | 100 – 3200 |
AF Points | 49 (contrast-detect, face detection) | 11 (contrast-detect, face detection) |
Continuous Shooting Speed | 6 fps | 3 fps |
Built-in Image Stabilization | No | Yes (Sensor-based) |
LCD Screen | 3.0” Tilting, 1,040k dots | 2.7” Fixed, 230k dots |
EVF | None | Optional External EVF |
Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30 fps | HD 720p @ 30 fps |
Lens Mount | Fujifilm X mount | Micro Four Thirds |
Weight | 331 g | 334 g |
Dimensions (WxHxD) | 117 x 67 x 40 mm | 115 x 72 x 42 mm |
Battery Life (CIPA) | 410 shots | 290 shots |
Price at Launch | $499 | $288 |
Hands-On with Size, Build, and Handling
Size and ergonomics matter when it comes to camera use - especially if you’re out for long shoots, travel often, or prefer a compact setup. Both feature classic rangefinder-style bodies, but their nuances affect comfort and portability.
- Fujifilm X-A10 measures slightly taller but notably slimmer and lighter. The 3.0” tilting LCD offers great flexibility for composing shots at unconventional angles or selfies.
- Olympus PEN E-PL1 is a bit chunkier with thicker grip areas but has a fixed 2.7” screen that lags behind in resolution and articulation.
- The Fuji’s tilt screen makes it more appealing for vloggers or street photographers wanting quick framing, whereas the Olympus’s fixed screen reflects its earlier design generation.
- Neither camera features weather sealing, so shooting in wet environments requires care.
- Button layout differs notably - we’ll go into that with visual aid next.
Control Layout and User Interface: Navigating Your Creativity
Physical control placement dramatically influences your shooting rhythm and ease of operation - especially when shooting fast-moving subjects or changing settings on the fly.
- Fujifilm X-A10 offers a minimalistic yet logical top layout, including a mode dial supporting shutter priority, aperture priority, manual, and program modes. The budget rangefinder styling means no complex control wheels, but the intuitive placements allow quick exposures adjustment.
- Olympus PEN E-PL1, being earlier tech, has a simpler design with fewer physical dials and more reliance on menu navigation. Its mode dial is present but features easier access to art filters - a feature Olympus consumers have appreciated.
- Both lack illuminated buttons, which affects low-light usability.
- Neither provides an electronic viewfinder as a built-in option, although Olympus offers an external accessory EVF (sold separately), enhancing usability for traditional shooters.
The Heart of the Camera: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Understanding sensor specs gives direct insight into potential image quality, noise handling, and depth of field control.
- The Fujifilm X-A10’s APS-C sensor is larger (368.16 mm²) compared to the Four Thirds sensor of the Olympus E-PL1 (224.9 mm²). Generally, larger sensors gather more light, deliver cleaner images at higher ISOs, and produce more natural background blur (bokeh).
- Fuji’s 16 MP resolution edges out Olympus’s 12 MP, offering better detail retention for large prints and cropping options.
- The absence of an anti-aliasing (AA) filter in the Fuji sensor can result in sharper images but with a slightly higher risk of moiré patterns in some textures; Olympus retains an AA filter leading to smoother rendering but less fine detail.
- ISO performance favors Fuji’s broader range and expanded boost options. Olympus’s max native ISO topping at 3200 limits low-light versatility.
- Despite the age gap, the Fuji’s sensor technology, combined with modern processing, yields cleaner images at ISO 1600+ compared to Olympus’s older sensor, which demonstrates more noise and lower dynamic range.
- Both cameras support RAW capture, giving you post-processing control.
Viewing and Composing: LCD and Viewfinder Experience
How you frame your shot impacts creativity and comfort, making screen and viewfinder quality critical for workflows.
- The X-A10’s 3.0” 1,040k-dot tilting LCD facilitates flexible angles and clearer detail for critical focusing or reviewing images, especially important for street and travel photography.
- The E-PL1’s fixed 2.7” 230k-dot screen feels outdated and restrictive, making it harder to evaluate fine details or shoot from low/high vantage points.
- Neither camera has a built-in viewfinder, but Olympus users can opt for an external EVF accessory. Its lack on the Fuji may be a drawback for outdoor bright-light shooting, where LCD visibility can suffer.
- The Fuji’s screen is not touch sensitive, nor does Olympus provide touchscreen capability, so manual focusing and menu navigation rely on buttons and dials.
Autofocus System and Performance in Real Shooting
Let’s talk about what powers your sharp pictures - autofocus (AF) speed, accuracy, and tracking capability.
- The Fujifilm X-A10 employs a 49-point contrast-detection AF with face detection and tracking capabilities. Though contrast systems are generally slower than phase detection, Fuji optimized it to provide steady AF performance ideal for static subjects, portraits, and casual street shots.
- With a maximum continuous shooting rate of 6 fps, the X-A10 lets you capture action moderately well, although autofocus tracking during continuous shooting is limited by the contrast-based system’s speed.
- The Olympus E-PL1, with an 11-point contrast AF, is less advanced. Its shooting speed tops at 3 fps, making it less suitable for fast-moving subjects like sports or wildlife.
- Face detection is supported on both but without advanced eye or animal AF that newer cameras offer.
- Given the E-PL1’s age, expect hunting and slower acquisition in low contrast or low-light conditions.
- Fuji’s hybrid AF innovations came later models, so don’t expect professional-grade speed, but it suits beginners well.
Comprehensive Look: How These Cameras Perform Across Photography Genres
Choosing a camera also means understanding how its feature set fits your preferred photography style.
Photography Type | Fujifilm X-A10 Highlights | Olympus PEN E-PL1 Highlights |
---|---|---|
Portraits | Better skin tone rendition due to APS-C sensor, natural bokeh, face detection autofocus | Limited bokeh and resolution but useful art filters add creative flair |
Landscape | Higher resolution and dynamic range; no weather sealing means care needed in tough conditions | Smaller sensor limits image detail; compact size helps portability |
Wildlife | Faster burst (6 fps), more AF points for tracking; limited telephoto lens selection | Slower burst (3 fps), less AF points; strong lens ecosystem benefits jump in telephoto |
Sports | Moderate frame rate and AF speed; slower FPS limits prolonged action shoots | Not optimal for fast action given slow AF and 3 fps continuous shooting |
Street | Compact, silent shutter mode, quick tilt LCD beneficial | Compact body and lightweight; fixed LCD less versatile for low-angle framing |
Macro | No focus stacking or post-focus; manual focus enjoyable with focus peaking on Fuji X series | Similar lack of advanced macro features; stabilization helps handheld macro |
Night/Astro | Expanded ISO and silent shutter make it better suited for night photography | Limited ISO and shorter shutter range constrain astrophotography potential |
Video | Full HD 1080p at 30 fps; lacks microphone input and 4K | 720p max resolution, simpler codec; no audio input |
Travel | Slimmer, lighter, versatile lens options | Slightly bulkier, excellent compact primes from Micro Four Thirds |
Professional | RAW output and manual exposure modes support creative control | Older sensor limits image quality for professional print demands |
Image Quality in Practice: Sample Gallery Insights
To gauge how these differences translate into real images, let’s examine sample photos taken under varied conditions.
- Notice the X-A10’s superior detail and cleaner shadows in landscape scenes - thanks to the higher-res sensor and wider dynamic range.
- Portrait shots reveal skin tones with smoother gradations and natural bokeh on the Fuji.
- The Olympus renders bright colors well but with less detail on fine textures such as foliage.
- Low light images from Fuji maintain better clarity; Olympus’ images show more noise.
- Both cameras handle street scenes crisply in bright sunlight, though Fuji’s faster AF helps catch fleeting moments with ease.
Behind The Lens: Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Lens availability and quality directly influence creative possibilities.
- Fujifilm X mount boasts a healthy lineup of 54 lenses, including high-quality primes and zooms from Fuji and third parties. This gives you flexibility to shoot everything from ultrawide landscapes to portrait primes with beautiful bokeh.
- Micro Four Thirds mount benefits from a vast ecosystem of over 100 lenses shared across brands like Olympus and Panasonic, with numerous compact primes and specialized lenses available. The crop factor of 2.0x means lenses appear more telephoto relative to full frame.
- Fuji’s APS-C sensor will yield a slightly shallower depth of field at equal apertures compared to MFT, impacting portrait and macro work.
- Micro Four Thirds lenses tend to be more compact and lightweight overall, aiding portability.
Power and Storage: Battery Life and Data Handling
You want your camera to last through your shooting sessions without hiccups.
- Fujifilm X-A10 offers 410 shots per charge (CIPA rating), excellent for entry-level mirrorless. Its battery model NP-W126S is widely available and interchangeable with other Fuji models.
- Olympus PEN E-PL1 manages around 290 shots per battery, less robust but fairly typical for older mirrorless cameras.
- Both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with single card slots - be mindful of card speed for video recording.
- Connectivity upgrades favor Fuji with built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote control. Olympus lacks wireless features, limiting instant sharing or tethering.
Technical Edge: Video, Stabilization, and Connectivity
- Video Capabilities:
- Fuji’s full HD 1080p up to 30 fps surpasses Olympus’s 720p max at 30 fps.
- Both cameras lack microphone or headphone jacks, so external audio monitoring or input is not possible.
- Fuji uses modern H.264 compression compared to Olympus’s older Motion JPEG, resulting in better file sizes and quality.
- Image Stabilization:
- Olympus’s sensor-based stabilization aids handheld shooting and video, a clear edge over Fuji’s lack of stabilization, placing more reliance on stabilized lenses or tripods.
- Connectivity:
- Fuji’s built-in Wi-Fi enhances workflow and social media sharing.
- Olympus offers no wireless features and depends exclusively on USB 2.0 and HDMI for data transfer.
Overall Performance Ratings
Let’s summarize these findings with an overall performance rating based on image quality, speed, usability, and feature set.
- FujiFilm X-A10 scores higher due to superior image quality, better video options, more AF points, and connectivity.
- Olympus PEN E-PL1 trails but shines in stabilized shooting and lens availability.
- Both cameras deliver solid value for entry-level users, but Fuji stands out in core imaging capabilities.
Tailored Scores: How These Cameras Excel In Various Photography Genres
Here’s a look at how each camera stacks up by genre - a handy guide for focusing your investment.
- Fuji excels in portrait, landscape, street, and video.
- Olympus has an advantage in macro and handheld low-light shooting, thanks to stabilization.
- Neither is ideal for professional sports or wildlife photography due to AF limits and frame rate.
- Fuji’s travel readiness is enhanced by modern features and connectivity, plus better battery life.
Our Recommendation: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Fujifilm X-A10 if:
- You want better image quality and resolution for portraits and landscapes.
- Video recording at full HD and better codec handling matters.
- Wi-Fi connectivity and a tilting screen are important for your workflow or vlogging.
- You desire higher burst shooting speed (6 fps) and more flexible exposure modes.
- You’re willing to invest a bit more for a camera that grows with you.
Choose the Olympus PEN E-PL1 if:
- You’re on a tight budget but want a reliable stepping stone into mirrorless with a compact form.
- Sensor stabilization is crucial to you for handheld macro or video.
- You value access to a diverse and compact Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem.
- Art filters and in-camera creative effects appeal to your photography style.
- You don’t require high-res video or extremely fast autofocus performance.
Final Thoughts: Making Your Choice Count
Both cameras represent important milestones in the mirrorless revolution and remain capable options for beginners and hobbyists. Your choice boils down largely to sensor preference and feature needs:
- The Fujifilm X-A10 offers stronger fundamentals for image quality with a modern sensor, better video, and user-friendly features.
- The Olympus PEN E-PL1 provides sensor stabilization and classic Micro Four Thirds versatility unmatched at its entry price point.
Check out hands-on in-store demos if possible. Test the ergonomics and ease of use, and if you prioritize sharp, colorful photos with video ambitions, the X-A10 likely suits you best. Conversely, if you seek extensive lens options in a compact package and stabilization is your priority, the Olympus PEN E-PL1 remains a competent choice.
Whichever you pick, enjoy the process of growing your visual storytelling. Dive into your camera settings, explore lenses, and keep refining your craft - we’re here to help you along your creative journey every step of the way.
Ready to explore more?
Check out the dedicated lenses for your chosen system, and experiment with portrait, macro, or night modes. Each great photo starts with thoughtful gear matched to your vision!
Happy shooting!
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-A10 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-A10 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-12-01 | 2010-05-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro, rear-curtain synchro, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p. 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p,24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 67 x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photos | 290 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, smile, buddy, group) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $499 | $288 |