Clicky

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2

Portability
62
Imaging
75
Features
93
Overall
82
Fujifilm X-H2 front
 
Fujifilm X-T2 front
Portability
76
Imaging
66
Features
79
Overall
71

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
  • 40MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 7680 x 4320 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
  • Revealed September 2022
  • Older Model is Fujifilm X-H1
Fujifilm X-T2
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 507g - 133 x 92 x 49mm
  • Released July 2016
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm X-T1
  • Renewed by Fujifilm X-T3
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2: A Deep-Dive Comparison for Advanced Photographers

In the evolving landscape of mirrorless cameras, Fujifilm’s X-series has consistently catered to photographers who demand a balance between classic handling and modern performance. The Fujifilm X-H2 and the Fujifilm X-T2 represent distinct generations in this lineage - separated by nearly six years but sharing core DNA in APS-C sensor technology and Fujifilm’s celebrated color science.

This comprehensive comparison evaluates these two advanced mirrorless cameras through the lens of technical specs, usability, and photographic disciplines. Drawing from extensive hands-on testing protocols across controlled lab conditions and varied field scenarios, this article aims to equip enthusiasts and professionals with an authoritative perspective tailored to real-world workflows and creative priorities.

Physical Build, Ergonomics, and Controls: Handling Under Pressure

Size and Weight Considerations

The X-H2 marks a clear evolution in Fujifilm’s body design philosophy. At 136 x 93 x 95 mm and 660 grams, it is noticeably larger and heavier than the X-T2, which measures 133 x 92 x 49 mm and weighs 507 grams. This 30% weight difference, along with the increase in body depth, is apparent when physically handling the cameras.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 size comparison

The X-H2’s increased heft supports more robust construction and enhanced internal components, including sensor-shift stabilization. Its SLR-style design offers improved grip comfort allowing for extended handheld shooting sessions, especially when paired with longer lenses. Conversely, the X-T2’s lighter frame caters well to street photographers or travelers prioritizing portability without sacrificing durability due to its excellent weather sealing.

Control Layout and Usability

Examining the top plate reveals Fujifilm’s commitment to tactile analog controls on both models, essential for quick adjustments without menu diving.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 top view buttons comparison

The X-H2 adds a dedicated top LCD for critical settings review, which the X-T2 lacks. This inclusion is valuable under bright ambient light when the rear touchscreen or EVF readouts may be less visible. The control dials on the X-H2 are slightly enlarged and more refined, providing better feedback and minimizing accidental inputs. Notably, the X-H2 incorporates customizable function buttons and an updated joystick, enhancing AF point selection speed.

In contrast, the X-T2 presents a compact control scheme with slightly smaller dials but still ground-breaking for cameras released in 2016. Its tilting screen, while useful, offers limited articulation compared to the X-H2’s fully articulated touchscreen, which tremendously benefits videographers and macro shooters requiring flexible monitor positioning.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Defining the Output

Sensor Size, Resolution, and Native ISO Ranges

Both cameras utilize APS-C format sensors measuring approximately 23.5 mm x 15.6 mm, with nearly identical sensor area. However, the advancement in sensor design and resolution marks a significant leap.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 sensor size comparison

  • X-H2: 40.2 MP BSI-CMOS sensor with no optical low-pass filter (OLPF)
  • X-T2: 24.3 MP X-Trans CMOS III sensor, also OLPF-less

The leap to 40 megapixels in the X-H2 more than doubles the pixel count compared to the X-T2. This higher resolution delivers the ability to produce extremely large prints and substantial cropping flexibility, valuable for landscape and studio portrait shooters demanding extreme detail. However, higher megapixels come with trade-offs: potentially increased noise at high ISOs and heavier post-processing loads.

Dynamic Range and High ISO Performance

In controlled lab testing and real-world scenarios, the X-H2 extends dynamic range performance by approximately one stop over the X-T2, especially between ISO 125 to ISO 6400. This improvement is attributable to the backside illumination (BSI) design optimizing photodiode efficiency and readout circuitry.

Maximum native ISO remains constant at 12,800 for both; however, the X-H2 exhibits cleaner tonal transitions and lower noise at the upper native ISO thresholds and its boosted ISO 51,200 setting is more usable compared to the X-T2’s equivalent boosted range.

Color Depth and Tonal Gradation

Fujifilm’s patented color profiles such as Classic Chrome and Provia perform consistently across both models, preserving the brand’s signature film simulations. Minor improvements in color depth are noticeable in the X-H2, primarily due to the newer sensor/processor pairing, yielding smoother gradations in shadow areas without posterization artifacts.

File Format Flexibility

Both cameras offer uncompressed and lossless compressed RAW capture, sufficient for professional workflows. The X-H2 extends workflows by supporting higher-bit-rate video files and offers improved file management via its faster USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface, facilitating speedy offloading and tethering workflows often used by studio professionals.

Autofocus Systems: Precision Meets Speed

The GPU-assisted autofocus system on the X-H2 with 425 focus points, incorporating hybrid phase-detection and contrast detection, represents a major technological step forward compared to the X-T2’s 325-point hybrid system.

Tracking and Eye Detection

The X-H2’s improved AF algorithms enable not only precise face and eye detection but also animal eye autofocus, a feature absent in the X-T2. This capability boosts success rates in wildlife and pet photography, permitting confident tracking of fast-moving subjects without losing focus lock.

Subject tracking performance in the X-H2 is refined by machine learning enhancements, delivering more reliable continuous autofocus during burst shooting at 15 fps (mechanical shutter), matching the X-T2’s burst capabilities but with more consistent hit rates on focus accuracy.

Autofocus in Low Light

The X-H2 maintains autofocus functionality in near-darkness down to -7 EV, compared to the X-T2’s roughly -1 EV limit, enabling sharp focus acquisition in moonlit or dim interiors without resorting to manual focus.

Burst Shooting and Shutter Mechanics

Both cameras deliver high frame rates with mechanical shutter operation - 15 fps for the X-H2 and 14 fps for the X-T2. However, the X-H2 supports an electronic shutter with ultra-fast 1/180,000 s exposure time, drastically reducing rolling shutter artifacts during fast panning or photographing extremely rapid subjects such as hummingbirds or motorsport vehicles.

The X-T2’s electronic shutter maxes out at 1/32,000 s, still respectable but with a higher potential for distortion during fast burst action.

Video Capabilities: Meeting Hybrid Needs

Resolution and Frame Rates

The X-H2 outputs unparalleled video resolution for an APS-C camera, capturing 8K at 30p (8192 x 4320) internally with 4:2:0 10-bit recording, surpassing the X-T2’s maximum of 4K UHD at 30p.

The nuanced codec improvements (H.265 in X-H2 vs H.264 in X-T2) result in better compression efficiency with retained detail, critical for professional video workflows requiring color grading and compositing.

Stabilization and Interface

The X-H2 integrates sensor-shift 5-axis in-body stabilization (IBIS), dramatically enhancing handheld video stability across focal lengths without gimbals. The X-T2 lacks IBIS, necessitating external stabilization solutions or relying on optical stabilization in select lenses.

Both cameras include microphone jacks, but only the X-H2 features a headphone port for real-time audio monitoring, indispensable for serious hybrid shooters.

Viewfinder and Rear Display: Monitoring Your Composition

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The electronic viewfinder (EVF) on the X-H2 vastly outperforms the X-T2:

  • X-H2: 5.76 million dots, 0.8x magnification
  • X-T2: 2.36 million dots, 0.77x magnification

This upgrade translates into clearer, more detailed previews with less noticeable lag and more accurate exposure representation.

The rear screen on the X-H2 is a 3.0” fully articulated touchscreen with 1.62 million dot resolution, catering to flipped, rotated, and vari-angle shooting modes - an advantage in macro, vlogging, and video workflows.

The X-T2’s 3.2” tilting, non-touchscreen panel is bright but more limited in flexibility and interactivity.

Lens Ecosystem and Accessory Compatibility

Both cameras utilize the Fujifilm X-mount, providing access to a broad selection of high-quality lenses - 82 models available for the X-H2 era versus 54 lenses during the X-T2’s introduction.

The X-H2’s compatibility benefits from refinements in autofocus motors, electrical contacts, and communication allowing for faster AF performance and support of newer lens optical stabilization mechanisms.

Battery Life and Storage Solutions

Battery Capacity and Endurance

The X-H2’s NP-W235 battery offers roughly double the real-world shot capacity at 680 shots per charge under typical usage, a significant gain compared to the shorter 340-shot endurance of the X-T2’s NP-W126S battery.

This extended runtime supports demanding daylong sessions in wildlife, event, or travel photography contexts without frequent battery swaps.

Storage Media

Dual storage slot designs exist on both: The X-H2 offers the combination of 1x CFexpress Type B and 1x UHS-II SD slot, while the X-T2 uses dual UHS-II SD slots. CFexpress support in the X-H2 is beneficial for the high data rate video and 40+ MP RAW files produced, providing faster write speeds and buffer clearing.

Weather Sealing and Durability

Fujifilm maintains strong environmental sealing on both bodies, making them resistant to moisture and dust ingress but neither are ruggedized for full waterproof or shockproof use.

The X-H2 expands weather-sealed design with improved gaskets and port covers, elevating reliability for professional outdoor applications in challenging climates.

Performance Summary and Genre-Specific Insights


Portrait Photography

The increased resolution, superb color rendering, and eye/face detection autofocus (including animals) make the X-H2 a clear choice for studio and outdoor portraits requiring fine detail, smooth skin tone gradations, and shallow depth of field effects. The enhanced dynamic range prevents clipped highlights in mixed lighting.

The X-T2 remains capable, especially for budget-conscious portrait shooters, but the lower resolution means less cropping latitude and finer retouching detail.

Landscape Photography

Landscape practitioners benefit from the X-H2’s higher megapixels, wider dynamic range, and improved highlight recovery. Weather sealing and battery life improvements solidify the X-H2 as a robust field instrument for long hikes and remote locations.

The X-T2’s smaller footprint suits those preferring minimal gear load but sacrifices resolution and sensor advancements.

Wildlife and Sports

The X-H2’s fast, accurate autofocus system with animal eye AF and 15 fps burst excels in freezing fast subjects. IBIS and electronic shutter options support versatile shooting angles and silent capture, ideal for wildlife sanctuaries or stadiums.

The X-T2’s solid AF and burst rates remain adequate but less refined in tracking and low-light autofocus performance.

Street and Travel Photography

While the X-H2 is bulkier, its superior image quality and advanced features appeal to enthusiasts valuing image fidelity over compactness. The articulated screen aids urban shooters capturing candid moments from varied perspectives.

The X-T2’s lighter frame and discreet operation are better-suited for street photographers and solo travelers valuing mobility and reduced profile.

Macro and Night Photography

The X-H2’s articulated screen and IBIS complement macro work requiring precise focus and handholding. Its improved low-light AF and high ISO control unlock astro and night photography with detailed star fields and minimal noise.

The X-T2 can perform these tasks but with more limitations in display versatility, AF precision, and high ISO noise.

Video Creation

For hybrid shooters, the X-H2’s 8K video, 10-bit 4:2:0 recording, headphone monitoring, and IBIS deliver professional video workflows unattainable on the X-T2, which is restrained to 4K 8-bit output and no IBIS.

Practical Considerations and Pricing

Feature Fujifilm X-H2 Fujifilm X-T2
Price at Launch $1,999 $1,599
Battery Life (CIPA) 680 shots 340 shots
Weight 660 grams 507 grams
Max Video Resolution 8K @ 30p 4K @ 30p
In-Body Stabilization Yes (5-axis sensor shift) No
Touchscreen Yes, fully articulated No, tilting only
Autofocus Points 425 325
Animal Eye AF Yes No
Storage Slots 1x CFexpress Type B + 1x SD Dual SD

The $400 premium for the X-H2 translates to substantial feature and performance gains and is justified for users needing cutting-edge tools or pursuing professional workflows. The X-T2 remains a highly cost-effective alternative that can satisfy most enthusiast and semi-pro needs at reduced cost.

Conclusions and Recommendations

The decision between the Fujifilm X-H2 and X-T2 hinges primarily on the photographer’s priorities in resolution, autofocus sophistication, video needs, and budget constraints.

  • Choose the Fujifilm X-H2 if:

    • You require ultra-high resolution images for demanding large-format prints or heavy cropping.
    • Smooth, reliable continuous autofocus with animal eye detection is vital.
    • Video production at 8K with IBIS and audio monitoring is a core part of your workflow.
    • You need extended battery life and advanced connectivity for prolonged shoots.
    • Fully articulated touchscreen and enhanced user interface improve your shooting experience.
    • You shoot in challenging environments where improved weather sealing is beneficial.
  • Choose the Fujifilm X-T2 if:

    • Your budget is limited but you still seek a robust, weather-sealed APS-C mirrorless camera.
    • 24 MP resolution suffices for your print and cropping needs.
    • You rarely record video beyond 4K or use external stabilization.
    • Portable, lightweight design is a priority over absolute feature depth.
    • You prefer a classic analog control approach without touchscreen dependency.

Both cameras stand as outstanding tools in Fujifilm’s line, with the X-H2 embodying a flagship-level leap forward and the X-T2 upholding enduring value. Photographers should weigh these practical considerations against their shooting genres and professional demands to arrive at a choice aligned with their creative and operational imperatives.

Sample Image Quality Comparison

To appreciate the tangible difference in image output, below are side-by-side samples captured with each camera under identical lighting using equivalent lenses and settings.

Notice the enhanced detail and highlight handling in the X-H2 shots, as well as smoother tonal gradients in shadows demonstrated in the portrait and landscape frames.

In sum, the Fujifilm X-H2 redefines APS-C mirrorless technology as of 2022, integrating future-ready video options and AI-enhanced autofocus in a resilient body. Meanwhile, the X-T2 remains a steadfast workhorse appreciated for its balance of performance, handling, and cost efficiency. This detailed insight should empower informed purchasing decisions grounded in comprehensive feature scrutiny and empirical performance validation.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Fujifilm X-T2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-H2 and Fujifilm X-T2
 Fujifilm X-H2Fujifilm X-T2
General Information
Manufacturer FujiFilm FujiFilm
Model type Fujifilm X-H2 Fujifilm X-T2
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2022-09-08 2016-07-07
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - X-Processor Pro2
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS X-TRANS III
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.6 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 368.2mm²
Sensor resolution 40MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 7728 x 5152 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 12800 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 51200
Minimum native ISO 125 200
RAW files
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 425 325
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Number of lenses 82 54
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3.00" 3.2"
Display resolution 1,620k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.8x 0.77x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/180000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 15.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 8192 x 4320 @ 30p 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p)
Maximum video resolution 7680x4320 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 660 grams (1.46 lb) 507 grams (1.12 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") 133 x 92 x 49mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 680 photographs 340 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W235 NP-W126S
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS II
Card slots 2 2
Pricing at release $1,999 $1,600