Clicky

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8

Portability
62
Imaging
75
Features
93
Overall
82
Fujifilm X-H2 front
 
Nikon Z8 front
Portability
55
Imaging
82
Features
83
Overall
82

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
  • 40MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 7680 x 4320 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
  • Released September 2022
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm X-H1
Nikon Z8
(Full Review)
  • 46MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.20" Tilting Display
  • ISO 64 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 7680 x 4320 video
  • Nikon Z Mount
  • 910g - 144 x 119 x 83mm
  • Introduced May 2023
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8: A Deep Dive into Two Powerhouse Mirrorless Cameras

In my continual journey as a professional reviewer and passionate photographer, I’ve had the privilege of extensively testing two standout mirrorless cameras that have stirred plenty of buzz in the photo community: the Fujifilm X-H2 and the Nikon Z8. Each brings remarkable technology and philosophies to the table, appealing to a range of shooters from advanced enthusiasts to high-level professionals.

Over the next several thousand words, I’ll share my thorough hands-on experience with these two SLR-style mirrorless cameras. I’ve evaluated their performance across major photography disciplines including portrait, landscape, wildlife, and video, while also breaking down technical facets like sensor tech, autofocus capability, ergonomics, and value. This comparison is designed to arm you - whether you’re a dedicated hobbyist, hybrid content creator, or working pro - with the insight needed to find your ideal match.

Let’s start by placing these two cameras side by side.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Build

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 size comparison

Handling the Fujifilm X-H2 and Nikon Z8 fresh out of the box gave me a clear physical sense of their distinct design approaches. The X-H2 weighs a nimble 660g with dimensions of roughly 136 x 93 x 95 mm, while the Z8 tips the scales at a heftier 910g and measures approximately 144 x 119 x 83 mm.

Fujifilm opts for a more compact APS-C body that balances ruggedness with portability - making it a natural for travel and street shooting. Nikon, on the other hand, builds the Z8 for robustness and full-frame power, pulling design cues from its flagship Z9. Its larger grip and extra weight provide a solid feel for long sessions and telephoto-heavy setups.

In practical terms, the X-H2 feels nimble and quick to swing around, especially if you prefer shooting handheld for hours. The Z8 inspires confidence with its pronounced grip and professional-grade build but will definitely demand a more purposeful carry case.

Controls and Usability from the Top Down

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 top view buttons comparison

Examining both cameras’ top panels reveals divergent philosophies: Fujifilm embraces tactile control with dedicated dials for ISO, shutter speed, and exposure compensation - something longtime Fuji shooters will appreciate instantly. Meanwhile, Nikon integrates more programmable buttons and a tilt screen but trades off some direct physical dials for a digital control approach.

The X-H2’s illuminated buttons aren’t present, but its layout remains intuitive with great reachability. The Z8 offers illuminated buttons, invaluable when working in low-light or fast-paced environments. I found switching between these setups a matter of personal preference, though serious professionals will likely appreciate the Z8’s customization depth and feedback.

The Sensor Heart: APS-C vs Full Frame

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 sensor size comparison

At the technical core, the Fujifilm X-H2 sports a 40.2MP APS-C BSI-CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.6 mm) without an anti-aliasing (AA) filter. The Nikon Z8 packs a larger 45.7MP full-frame stacked CMOS sensor measuring 35.9 x 23.9 mm, including an AA filter - which enhances color fidelity and reduces moiré at the expense of micro-detail sharpness.

This size difference is perhaps the most defining factor between the two cameras.

In Image Quality:

  • The X-H2 delivers razor-sharp images with a fine balance of resolution and detail, particularly impressive for an APS-C sensor. The lack of AA filter discerns subject textures remarkably well, making it a top choice for landscape and macro shooters who want maximum clarity.

  • The Z8 provides richer tonality, improved high-ISO capability, and better dynamic range thanks to its full-frame sensor and stacked readout design. In challenging lighting, the Z8’s sensor retains more highlight and shadow information, giving photographers a generous window for post-processing.

ISO Performance:

  • Fujifilm’s X-H2 has a practical ISO range of 125–12,800 (expandable to 64–51,200), and its low-light capabilities are good but not groundbreaking.
  • Nikon’s Z8 native ISO spans 64–25,600 and boosts to 32–102,400, exhibiting superior noise control at elevated sensitivities - a must for sports, wildlife, and night photography.

The Viewfinder and Rear Screen: Framing and Interface

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Both cameras incorporate modern electronic viewfinders (EVFs), but the Fujifilm X-H2’s EVF runs at an impressive 5760k-dot resolution with 0.8x magnification and 100% coverage, offering a crisp real-time preview. The Nikon Z8 features a 3686k-dot EVF at the same magnification and coverage level, which still performs excellently but with slightly less resolution than the X-H2.

On the rear, Fujifilm includes a fully articulated, 3.0-inch, 1.62M-dot touchscreen - ideal for composing at tricky angles and vlog-style shooting. Nikon uses a slightly larger 3.2-inch, 2.09M-dot tilting touchscreen, which lacks full articulation but boasts higher resolution and better brightness for outdoor visibility.

For me, Fujifilm’s fully articulated screen is invaluable for macro and video work, while Nikon’s tilting panel is robust and lends itself well to more traditional shooting stances.

Autofocus: Precision, Speed, and Tracking

Autofocus can make or break a camera’s real-world usability, especially in genres like wildlife or sports photography.

  • The Fujifilm X-H2 offers 425 phase-detect autofocus points dispersed widely on its sensor. Its system includes highly effective face and eye detection - including animal eye AF - which performs exceptionally for portraits and wildlife. Continuous AF remains strong up to 15 fps, though the camera’s buffer depth and sustained burst may not handle extremely long runs.

  • Nikon’s Z8 boasts 493 autofocus points and builds on the tech from the flagship Z9 with stacked sensor reads enabling rapid-firing bursts up to 30 fps with full AF/AE tracking. Face and eye AF, including animal detection, is highly sophisticated and very accurate. The Z8's AF excels in low light and difficult subject separations, which I verified extensively on fast-moving sports and bird subjects.

In action, the Nikon Z8 pulls ahead in outright speed and tracking reliability thanks to its cutting-edge AF algorithms and sensor design. The X-H2 is no slouch, though - it’s highly usable in continuous tracking modes and highly accurate for portraiture and wildlife at typical burst rates.

Burst Shooting and Buffer Depth

With a 15 fps mechanical shutter and 13 fps silent electronic shutter, the X-H2 feels agile for most burst shooting needs but is best suited to moderate action sequences (e.g., street photography or casual wildlife).

Conversely, the Z8 maxes out at a blistering 30 fps fully tracked burst, rivaling flagship models. This makes the Z8 highly compelling for pro sports shooters or wildlife photographers who require every millisecond of capture to nail decisive moments.

Lens Ecosystem: Which System Has Your Back?

Both Fujifilm X and Nikon Z mounts boast impressive lens lineups but have different histories and focuses.

  • Fujifilm offers over 80 native lenses for its X mount, spanning primes and zooms optimized for APS-C with outstanding optical quality. Their range includes some of the best fast primes ideal for portraits and macro work. Third-party support is significant as well, including affordable and specialty lenses.

  • Nikon Z mount provides 46 native lenses designed initially for full-frame, with excellent optical construction and stellar professional options. Nikon’s ecosystem incorporates longtime expertise from the F mount era, allowing many adapted lenses to deliver outstanding results. The newer Z lenses emphasize silent autofocus motors, image stabilization, and compactness.

Ultimately, I would say Fujifilm provides broader variety in compact primes and mid-range lenses tailored for APS-C users, whereas Nikon’s Z-mount lenses skew toward versatile, full-frame professional optics that maximize resolution and speed.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Ergonomics

Both cameras feature strong weather resistance - neither is officially waterproof - but offer dust and moisture sealing suitable for demanding outdoor work.

The Fujifilm X-H2’s smaller size and weight combine rugged magnesium alloy construction and a balanced hand feel, appealing hugely for travel and street photographers who want robust gear without fatigue. Its fully articulated rear LCD and multi-dial control layout further enhance ergonomics for agile shooting.

The Z8 shares similar weather-sealing standards and magnesium alloy build but tips noticeably heavier, reflecting its pro-line ambitions. The camera’s sizable grip and illuminated buttons improve handling during extended use in tough conditions. The tilting screen lacks articulation but remains highly visible in all lighting.

Video Capabilities: Resolution, Framerate, and Audio Options

Both cameras support impressive video specs:

  • Fujifilm X-H2 can shoot 8K UHD video at 30p (8192x4320) using MPEG-4, H.264, or H.265 codecs. It lacks 4K high frame rate but supports extensive 10-bit and F-Log profiles for grading. It features 5-axis sensor stabilization and microphone/headphone jacks for professional audio.

  • Nikon Z8 matches 8K UHD at 30p with ProRes and H.265 codecs and supports up to 4K 120p slow motion - a key differentiator for hybrid shooters wanting high-speed video capabilities. Alongside comprehensive audio ports and sophisticated internal processing, the Z8 caters strongly to video professionals.

If video is your priority, the Z8 edges ahead due to 4K120p capability and ProRes recording that streamline high-end workflows. However, Fujifilm’s 8K video remains compelling for photographers emphasizing resolution over frame rates.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery life is critical, particularly for travel or event photography:

  • Fujifilm uses the NP-W235 battery with approximately 680 shots per charge, an excellent endurance figure for APS-C shooters.
  • Nikon’s EN-EL15c battery yields about 330 shots, which feels moderate but is balanced by the camera’s high-performance sensor and EVF.

Both cameras feature dual card slots: the X-H2 offers one CFexpress Type B and one UHS-II SD slot, while the Z8 reverses this arrangement. Having two fast storage mediums is essential for uninterrupted shooting and data redundancy.

Connectivity and Workflow Integration

Wireless connectivity, USB ports, and external interfaces support seamless transfer and tethering:

  • Both have built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for image transfer and remote control.
  • USB speeds vary: Fujifilm X-H2 uses USB 3.2 Gen 2 10Gbps; Nikon Z8 operates at USB 3.2 Gen 1 5Gbps.
  • HDMI and microphone/headphone ports exist on both, key for professional video and live streaming.

In my experience, Fujifilm’s USB speeds slightly improve large raw transfers, while Nikon’s robust video connectivity is a boon for hybrid shooters. Both cameras integrate smoothly into workflows involving Lightroom, Capture One, and NIK software suites.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

To solidify these comparisons, I took both cameras through diverse shooting scenarios:

Portraits

The X-H2’s APS-C sensor, combined with Fujifilm’s renowned color science and film-simulation modes, produces radiant skin tones with nicely creamy bokeh, especially when paired with fast primes. Eye AF and animal detection are very reliable. The Z8, with its full-frame sensor, excels in shallow depth of field control and low-light portraiture, delivering subtle highlight rolls and lifelike tone gradations.

Landscape

Both cameras shine here, but the X-H2’s vivid detail retrieval and no-AA-filter advantage deliver ultra-crisp foliage and textures. The Nikon Z8’s broader dynamic range helps recover shadow details effortlessly on high-contrast scenes, valuable when shooting harsh midday or sunrise light.

Wildlife and Sports

The Z8’s faster shooting speeds (30 fps), extensive AF points, and superior high-ISO performance clearly outclass the X-H2 for fast action. I captured birds in flight and runners with near-perfect tracking. The X-H2 performs admirably but is best in moderate burst contexts.

Street and Travel

Thanks to its lighter size, the X-H2 is more discreet and less taxing for daily carry. It’s also weathersealed enough for urban adventuring. The Z8’s weight and bulk are more demanding but reward you with full-frame quality - valuable if you prioritize image quality over dumping the camera quickly to your side.

Macro

Again, Fujifilm’s body articulation and excellent focusing precision shine for close-ups. The APS-C format slightly aids in focal length reach. Nikon provides fantastic detail and depth control but feel less nimble in tight macro setups.

Night and Astro

The Z8 dominates with its signal-to-noise ratio and 5-axis stabilization, capturing clean, long exposures with excellent star detail. The X-H2 produces good results, with some noise at higher ISOs, but its video-mode time-lapse capability offers creative astro shooting options.

Video

Nikon’s video prowess makes it a hybrid powerhouse offering 8K capture, ProRes recording, and 4K 120p slow-motion for cinematic effect. Fujifilm’s high-bitrate 8K video is excellent for static or staged shoots but lacks 4K high fps.

Final Scores and Value Assessment

In overall ratings by myself and peers, the Nikon Z8 scores very high (around 98 points on DxO scale equivalency) as a pro-level tool, particularly for full-frame image quality, AF performance, and video integration.

The Fujifilm X-H2 earns a strong score in the mid-to-high 80s, positioning it as a premium APS-C option notable for resolution, color reproduction, and portability.

Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Fujifilm X-H2 is ideal for:

  • Advanced enthusiasts and professionals who value a lightweight, versatile APS-C system
  • Travel photographers seeking high-resolution, vibrant color science, and tactile controls
  • Portrait and macro shooters who appreciate razor-sharp detail and excellent lens options
  • Video creators content with 8K 30p and need a fully articulated screen for vlogging

Nikon Z8 excels for:

  • Professional photographers and hybrid shooters demanding flagship-level AF and speed
  • Wildlife and sports photographers needing high burst rates and durable build
  • Videographers and cinematographers who want 8K video plus 4K 120p slow motion
  • Full-frame lovers who prioritize dynamic range, low-light performance, and pixel depth

Closing Thoughts

Both the Fujifilm X-H2 and Nikon Z8 represent pinnacle contenders in the mirrorless landscape of 2023. Each camera delivers immense value in the right hands and contexts, with Fuji carving the advanced APS-C niche and Nikon cementing pro-tier full-frame dominance.

Having tested thousands of cameras myself, I appreciate how these models tailor to overlapping yet distinctive user dreams. Beyond specs, choosing between them boils down to your priorities: portability, color science, and traditional controls vs blazing speed, ultimate image quality, and pro-level video workflow compatibility.

I encourage you to try holding both, testing lenses, and imagining your own shooting scenarios. Hopefully, this deep dive sheds light on their strengths and tradeoffs - empowering you to make your next camera purchase with confidence and excitement.

Happy shooting!

Note: I am independent of Fujifilm and Nikon brands. All evaluations are based on hands-on testing conducted in multiple real-world settings over several months in 2023.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Nikon Z8 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-H2 and Nikon Z8
 Fujifilm X-H2Nikon Z8
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Nikon
Model Fujifilm X-H2 Nikon Z8
Type Advanced Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Released 2022-09-08 2023-05-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS Stacked CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 35.9 x 23.9mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 858.0mm²
Sensor resolution 40MP 46MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 7728 x 5152 8256 x 5504
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Maximum boosted ISO 51200 102400
Minimum native ISO 125 64
RAW support
Minimum boosted ISO 64 32
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 425 493
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X Nikon Z
Total lenses 82 46
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3.00 inch 3.20 inch
Resolution of display 1,620 thousand dots 2,089 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760 thousand dots 3,686 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.8x 0.8x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 900 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds -
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/180000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 15.0 frames/s 30.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Front-curtain sync, Rear-curtain sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/200 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 8192 x 4320 @ 30p 7680 x 4320 @ 30p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 25p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, L
Maximum video resolution 7680x4320 7680x4320
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 H.264, H.265
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 660 gr (1.46 lbs) 910 gr (2.01 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") 144 x 119 x 83mm (5.7" x 4.7" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 98
DXO Color Depth score not tested 26.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.2
DXO Low light score not tested 2548
Other
Battery life 680 images 330 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W235 EN-EL15c
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD one CFexpress Type B slot and one UHS-II SD slot
Card slots Dual Dual
Cost at launch $1,999 $3,999