Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
63 Imaging
78 Features
93 Overall
84
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Released September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
- Introduced October 2017
- Superseded the Sony A7R II
- Replacement is Sony A7R IV
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Overview
Following is a extended review of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Sony. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and the A7R III (42MP) is pretty similar but the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and A7R III (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-H2 was announced 4 years after the A7R III which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the Fujifilm X-H2 matches up vs the A7R III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony Alpha A7R III. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Sony A7R III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Sony A7R III
Fujifilm X-H2 | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | October 2017 | More modern by 60 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1440k | Crisper screen (+180k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Fujifilm X-H2
A7R III | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sony A7R III
Fujifilm X-H2 | A7R III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H2 provides physical dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Sony A7R III has sizing of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") with a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 against the A7R III.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and A7R III is 62 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H2 and A7R III.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A7R III will deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H2 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sony A7R III Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Sony Alpha A7R III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Sony |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Sony Alpha A7R III |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-09-08 | 2017-10-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 42 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 7952 x 5304 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 82 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 1,440k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 3,686k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 15.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 pounds) | 657g (1.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 100 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3523 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photographs | 650 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W235 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one) |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch cost | $1,999 | $2,800 |