Clicky

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5

Portability
80
Imaging
56
Features
52
Overall
54
Fujifilm X-Pro1 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 front
Portability
91
Imaging
52
Features
62
Overall
56

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-Pro1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 450g - 140 x 82 x 43mm
  • Announced June 2012
  • Renewed by Fujifilm X-Pro2
Panasonic GM5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 211g - 99 x 60 x 36mm
  • Launched September 2014
  • Succeeded the Panasonic GM1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5: A Hands-On Mirrorless Camera Showdown

When I embarked on a deep-dive comparison between the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and the Panasonic Lumix GM5, I knew I was pitting two fascinating mirrorless cameras from slightly different eras and philosophies against each other. The X-Pro1, launched in 2012, is an enthusiast-grade APS-C sensor camera with a classic rangefinder style, while the GM5 from 2014 shrinks things down with a Micro Four Thirds sensor and an eye on portability. After testing them both extensively in diverse shooting environments and painstakingly analyzing their specifications, I’m excited to share a comprehensive, real-world comparison for photographers weighing these two options.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Handling

These cameras carry photographic legacies in their body styles - both echoing a rangefinder aesthetic, but they couldn’t feel more different in hand.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 size comparison

The Fujifilm X-Pro1 is noticeably larger and heftier at 450 grams with dimensions of 140x82x43 mm. It commands presence, feeling solidly built without being bulky. In contrast, the Panasonic GM5 weighs just 211 grams and measures a compact 99x60x36 mm - an absolute pocket rocket. For street shooters or travelers prioritizing ultra-compact kit, the GM5 is almost unrivaled.

Ergonomically, the X-Pro1’s body offers more substantial grip and physical dials that I found indispensable for manual setting adjustments. The GM5, faithful to its diminutive form, sacrifices some handling comfort, especially with larger lenses, but I appreciated its minimalism and touchscreen interface. That said, the GM5’s touchscreen functionality gave it a modern edge lacking on the X-Pro1, which still relies on physical buttons.

Top-Level Design and Control Layout Insights

The controls layout plays an outsized role in shaping the shooting experience, especially in spontaneous scenarios such as street or wildlife photography.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 top view buttons comparison

Looking down at these cameras, the X-Pro1 is characterized by robust, tactile dials: shutter speed and exposure compensation dials are upfront and unmistakable. This level of direct control appealed strongly during my sessions shooting portraits and landscapes, where subtle exposure shifts are invaluable.

Meanwhile, the GM5 uses a more traditional shutter dial and a mode dial, with fewer dedicated exposure controls on the body. While touchscreen exposure control alleviates this, the experience is less immediate under bright conditions or when wearing gloves. The GM5 is designed for photographers comfortable toggling menus - something to keep in mind for quick-action shooting.

Sensor and Image Quality: Battle of APS-C vs. Micro Four Thirds

To many, the sensor size fundamentally defines a camera's photographic potential. The X-Pro1’s APS-C sensor typically affords an advantage in image quality over the smaller Four Thirds sensor in the GM5. Here’s how they compare technically:

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 sensor size comparison

  • Fujifilm X-Pro1: APS-C sensor measuring 23.6 x 15.6 mm with 16MP resolution, boasting the unique X-Trans I color filter array that omits the conventional anti-aliasing filter, preserving sharpness and fine detail.
  • Panasonic GM5: Four Thirds sensor at 17.3 x 13 mm, also 16MP resolution, with a traditional Bayer filter including an anti-aliasing filter that slightly softens images to prevent moiré but at a cost to micro-detail.

In my portrait and landscape testing, the X-Pro1 consistently produced images with richer tonality, superior dynamic range, and finer texture retention. Skin tones rendered naturally with impeccable nuance, partly due to Fuji’s color science and sensor design. Meanwhile, the GM5’s images, while clean and color-rich, trailed especially in shadow recovery and high ISO noise control.

Handling and Interface: The Back Screen Showdown

One area where user experience diverges beyond sensor size is in the rear LCD and interface design.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The X-Pro1 sports a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 1,230k-dot resolution, providing crisp playback but lacking touch capabilities. I found it perfectly serviceable for reviewing compositions, though in low light or quick selections, navigating menus felt clunkier.

Conversely, the GM5 features a 3-inch LCD 921k-dot touchscreen. This touchscreen was a breath of fresh air, allowing me to quickly move focus points and change settings without fumbling through buttons. This is crucial for fast-moving genres like wildlife or sports where responsiveness matters.

Though smaller in resolution, the tactile nature of the GM5’s interface adds flexibility that the X-Pro1’s traditional buttons and dials can’t match, especially for photographers accustomed to smartphone-style interactions.

Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy in Real Conditions

My hands-on testing revealed clear autofocus performance differences that align well with their technological generations.

  • Fujifilm X-Pro1: Relies on contrast-detection AF only, with no phase detection pixels. It offers 49 selectable focus points but lacks face or eye detection. Continuous autofocus is relatively slow and can struggle to keep pace with unpredictable motion.

  • Panasonic GM5: Utilizes contrast-detection AF supplemented by advanced algorithms, plus 23 AF points with face detection included. It boasts continuous tracking AF and touch-selectable focus areas.

These specs were confirmed in the field. During a short wildlife session, the GM5 outperformed the X-Pro1 in tracking erratic bird flight and adjusting focus quickly as subjects approached or withdrew. The X-Pro1 felt less confident in continuous autofocus, better suited to deliberate compositions like portraiture or landscapes.

Burst and Shutter Capabilities: Sporting a Quick Draw

Frame rates and shutter speeds define suitability for action and sports shooters.

  • The X-Pro1 manages 6 fps continuous shooting with a max mechanical shutter speed of 1/4000s.
  • The GM5 offers a nearly comparable 5.8 fps with a superior max mechanical shutter speed of 1/500s, but benefits greatly from an electronic silent shutter capable of 1/16000s, opening more creative shutter speed uses.

High frame rates combined with fast shutter speeds and silent operation on the GM5 make it more practical for street, sports, and wildlife photography where discretion and speed are paramount.

Build Quality and Environmental Resistance

Neither camera offers weather sealing, which is a drawback for outdoor photographers who regularly face harsh conditions. The X-Pro1’s larger body is constructed robustly but not to pro-rugged standards. The GM5, made for portability, feels more delicate - a tradeoff for its diminutive size.

Lens Ecosystem and Mount Compatibility

Lenses define a system’s creative range, and with mirrorless cameras, the mount’s ecosystem size and quality are paramount.

  • Fujifilm X-Pro1: Uses Fujifilm’s X-mount - one of the richest APS-C mirrorless mounts with 54 native lenses including prized primes for portraits (e.g., 56mm f/1.2), superwides, and telephotos. Fuji’s lens lineup is praised for optical quality and build.

  • Panasonic GM5: Employs the Micro Four Thirds mount, the broadest mirrorless lens ecosystem with over 100 lenses including high-quality zooms, primes, and specialty lenses. Its telephoto reach is effectively doubled by the 2.1x crop factor, beneficial for wildlife and sports.

The GM5’s versatility in lens choice - especially for telephoto and compact options - is a strong advantage, but Fuji’s acclaimed prime lenses excel for portraits and landscapes.

Battery Life and Storage Logistics

Battery performance is critical for travel and long shoots.

  • The X-Pro1 uses the NP-W126 battery with approximately 300 shots per charge.
  • The GM5 has a smaller-capacity battery (DMW-BLH7), rated for about 220 shots.

If you’re shooting on the go all day, the X-Pro1 will last longer before requiring a spare. Both cameras use single SD card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.

Connectivity: Modern Needs Met Differently

Connectivity options matter for quick sharing and remote control.

  • Fujifilm X-Pro1: No wireless connectivity. Requires cable connection for image transfer.
  • Panasonic GM5: Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless transfer and remote app control.

The GM5’s wireless features add convenience in today’s social media-driven photography environment - an appeal for travel, street, and event shooters.

Video Capabilities Explored

While neither camera is designed as a primary video tool, they offer modest video support.

  • The X-Pro1 records 1080p at 24fps; video quality is serviceable but with limited codec options and no microphone input.
  • The GM5 offers more flexible video at 1080p up to 60fps with AVCHD and MPEG-4 support, also lacking mic input.

For casual video work, the GM5 wins with smoother frame rates. Serious videographers will want other options.

How Do They Perform in Different Photography Genres?

To understand each camera's strengths, I reviewed them across primary shooting styles.

Portrait Photography

The X-Pro1’s larger sensor and X-Trans filter deliver superb skin tone reproduction and creamy bokeh, especially combined with Fuji's fast primes. Eye detection autofocus lacking here means locks rely on manual focus or center-point AF - manageable but less automatic.

GM5’s smaller sensor results in deeper depth of field, making background separation trickier, but face and eye detection provide more autofocus confidence. Good for casual portraits.

Landscape Photography

The X-Pro1 shines in landscapes with excellent resolution, wide dynamic range capturing shadow and highlight detail, and lens quality. Weather sealing absence limits outdoor ruggedness.

GM5 is capable but constrained by sensor size and dynamic range. Great for travel landscapes where portability matters more.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

GM5’s faster continuous AF tracking, silent shutter, burst modes, and extensive lens options make it a better companion for wildlife and sports action.

X-Pro1’s modest burst and slower AF curtail performance in these fast-paced genres.

Street Photography

GM5’s compactness and silent operation excel here. Touchscreen AF control allows on-the-fly focus adjustments.

X-Pro1 is bulkier but offers a distinctive shooting experience with the hybrid viewfinder, appreciated by enthusiasts who enjoy deliberate framing.

Macro and Close-up Photography

Neither camera has built-in stabilization or dedicated macro focus bracketing. Macro success depends heavily on lens choice.

Night and Astro Photography

X-Pro1’s higher native ISO and clean sensor output is a plus for starscapes and low light. GM5’s max ISO 25600 spec looks similar on paper, but noise control is less effective.

Video Use

GM5’s superior 1080p at higher frame rates makes basic video more viable. For occasional vloggers or casual shooting, it’s preferable.

Travel Photography

The GM5’s featherweight body, wireless connectivity, and vast lens ecosystem make it a joy for traveling light. The X-Pro1 is solid for travelers preferring image quality over packing light.

Professional and Workflow Integration

While both offer RAW support, the X-Pro1’s superior files make it a better fit for professionals focused on image quality. Lack of weather sealing and slower AF might limit some pro uses, but Fuji’s files integrate well into high-end workflows.

Technical Summary: Strengths and Weaknesses

My testing and analysis produce the following holistic score profile:

Criterion FujiFilm X-Pro1 Panasonic GM5
Image Quality Excellent Good
Autofocus Speed Moderate Good
Build & Handling Very Good Good
Lens Ecosystem Excellent Excellent
Video Capability Modest Good
Battery Life Better Moderate
Connectivity None Wi-Fi + NFC
Portability Moderate Excellent
Price-to-Performance Solid Very Good

Genre-Specific Scoring for Quick Reference

Genre X-Pro1 GM5
Portrait Superior Adequate
Landscape Superior Adequate
Wildlife Adequate Superior
Sports Adequate Superior
Street Good Superior
Macro Similar Similar
Night/Astro Superior Adequate
Video Adequate Superior
Travel Good Superior
Professional Workflow Superior Good

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Choosing between the Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Panasonic GM5 comes down to your photography priorities and preferences.

The Fujifilm X-Pro1 stands out for photographers who value:

  • Top-tier image quality with the nuanced rendition of Fujifilm's unique APS-C sensor.
  • Classic manual handling with physical dials and a hybrid viewfinder for precise shooting.
  • Portraits and landscapes where tonal richness and bokeh quality matter greatly.
  • Longer shooting sessions due to better battery life.

Its slower autofocus and lack of wireless connectivity may frustrate fast-action shooters or those embedded in a wireless workflow.

The Panasonic GM5, on the other hand, suits photographers who want:

  • The smallest, lightest camera in an advanced mirrorless system.
  • Excellent autofocus with face detection and touch controls.
  • Portability and discreetness for street, travel, and event photography.
  • A vast and versatile Micro Four Thirds lens lineup with strong telephoto options.
  • Superior video recording capabilities at Full HD 60p.
  • Modern wireless connectivity for quick sharing and remote shooting.

However, its smaller sensor limits ultimate image quality and dynamic range, and battery life is a constraint for extended sessions.

Who Should Buy Which?

  • Buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1 if:

    • You prioritize image quality above speed.
    • You relish manual controls and a vintage shooting feel.
    • You mainly shoot portraits, landscape, or work professionally.
    • You need better battery endurance and the tactile experience of physical dials.
  • Buy the Panasonic GM5 if:

    • You seek a pocketable camera for street and travel.
    • You want rapid autofocus with face/eye detection.
    • Video capability and wireless convenience are essential.
    • You want access to one of the widest lens ecosystems.

Closing Note on Testing Methodology

My assessments are based on thorough side-by-side shooting sessions - including portraits under natural light, landscapes at golden hour, action wildlife sequences, and night/star shots - to ensure balanced evaluation. I tested image quality via RAW files processed with same-brand recommended software and used focus charts, continuous burst tracking, and real-world scenarios to gauge autofocus performance. Battery life figures follow manufacturer specs but are consistent with my extended field use.

I have no commercial affiliations with Fujifilm or Panasonic and strive to maintain honest, balanced reviews that support photographers in making genuinely informed choices.

I hope this detailed comparison helps you decide which mirrorless camera best suits your creative vision and shooting style. Both cameras are remarkable milestones in mirrorless history with unique appeals that continue to influence the market today.

Happy shooting!

Fujifilm X-Pro1 vs Panasonic GM5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-Pro1 and Panasonic GM5
 Fujifilm X-Pro1Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Panasonic
Model Fujifilm X-Pro1 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5
Category Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2012-06-28 2014-09-15
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR Pro Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS I CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 368.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4896 x 3264 4592 x 3448
Max native ISO 6400 25600
Max boosted ISO 25600 -
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 23
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,230k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT color LCD monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic and Optical (tunnel) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,166k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.6x 0.46x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/500 secs
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 6.0fps 5.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 450g (0.99 pounds) 211g (0.47 pounds)
Dimensions 140 x 82 x 43mm (5.5" x 3.2" x 1.7") 99 x 60 x 36mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.7
DXO Low light score not tested 721
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 220 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126 DMW-BLH7
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $1,169 $966