Clicky

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II

Portability
72
Imaging
73
Features
92
Overall
80
Fujifilm X-S20 front
 
Nikon Z7 Mark II front
Portability
61
Imaging
80
Features
92
Overall
84

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
  • 26MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 6240 x 4160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 491g - 127 x 85 x 65mm
  • Launched May 2023
  • Replaced the Fujifilm X-S10
Nikon Z7 II
(Full Review)
  • 46MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 64 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Nikon Z Mount
  • 705g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
  • Announced October 2020
  • Earlier Model is Nikon Z7
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II: A Thorough Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing a mirrorless camera today means navigating a sea of options that span from affordable entry-level bodies to high-end pro shooters. In this comparison, I’m putting the Fujifilm X-S20 up against the Nikon Z7 II - two versatile cameras targeting very different users, yet both promising high image quality and solid feature sets. Having spent substantial hands-on time with both, I’ll break down how they perform in real-world conditions, translating specs into tangible benefits (or drawbacks).

So whether you’re an advanced hobbyist on a budget or a working pro investing in your craft, read on to see which camera matches your priorities best.

Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls

First impressions matter. The physical handling, balance, and control layout all influence shooting comfort and efficiency, especially when out in the field or at a fast-paced event.

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II size comparison

Here’s the deal: The Fujifilm X-S20 is noticeably smaller and lighter at just 491 grams, making it a great choice if portability is a priority. Its SLR-style design fits nicely in hand, but with a fairly compact body (127 x 85 x 65 mm), it doesn’t feel bulky. I found it ideal for travel days where lugging heavy gear isn’t an option. The fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen is not only selfie-friendly but super handy for composing at tricky angles.

In contrast, the Nikon Z7 II is a heftier beast at 705 grams and measures 134 x 101 x 70 mm. It’s built more solidly and feels substantial in hand, which gives confidence during long shoots. The grip is deeper and more contoured, great for larger lenses, but those extra grams may add up on multi-hour walks. The tilting, slightly bigger 3.2-inch screen doesn’t flip forward for selfies but has a higher resolution, which helps with finer details in live view.

Now, glance at the top controls:

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm keeps their signature retro dials, offering tactile shutter speed and ISO controls that tap right into creative shooting modes quickly. The X-S20’s button layout is intuitive and well-spaced, perfect for those who prefer manual fiddling without diving into menus.

Nikon’s Z7 II presents a more traditional, “pro-style” design with custom-function buttons and a secondary LCD panel on top, ideal for fast status checks. Controls here cater to working pros needing rapid adjustments on the fly, especially in dynamic environments like sports or wildlife shoots.

Magnifying the Details: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

Image output hinges largely on sensor capabilities - let’s get into the nitty-gritty.

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II sensor size comparison

The Fujifilm X-S20 sports an APS-C sized BSI-CMOS sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.6 mm, resolving 26 megapixels. This sensor packs a punch with excellent dynamic range and color fidelity, especially when paired with Fujifilm’s renowned color science. From my tests, skin tones look natural and vibrant without oversaturation, while JPEG colors straight out of camera often require minimal tweaking. The absence of an Anti-Aliasing (AA) filter helps retain edge sharpness, sacrificing minimal moiré in typical shooting scenarios.

Its ISO range is 160 to 12,800 natively, expandable to 80-51,200, which is respectable for the class. You can expect clean images up to ISO 6400, with usable results even beyond that in lower light.

Nikon Z7 II, however, ups the ante with a whopping full-frame 45.7-megapixel BSI-CMOS sensor (35.9 x 23.9 mm). The larger sensor area yields better light gathering per pixel, noticeably enhancing high ISO performance and dynamic range. This means smoother gradations in shadows and highlights, critical for landscape photography or any situation demanding subtle tonality.

The ISO native range of 64-25,600 (expandable from 32 to 102,400) provides greater flexibility in extremely low or bright conditions. When pixel-peeping, the Z7 II files reveal an incredible level of detail, perfect for large prints or commercial work requiring sharp output.

That said, the high megapixel count demands more from lenses to fully exploit resolution, so pairing it with top-quality optics is key.

Driving Focus: Autofocus Systems and Shooting Speeds

Let’s zero in on what keeps your subject sharp.

Both cameras offer hybrid autofocus with phase and contrast detection, plus face and eye detection for humans and animals - a must-have feature for today’s mirrorless shooters.

The Fujifilm X-S20 uses 425 focus points spread across the frame, which covers almost all of the sensor, providing generous compositional freedom. I found its autofocus accurate and responsive for portraits and street photography, locking quickly and tracking moving subjects decently at 8 fps mechanical shutter speed or silent burst modes up to 20 fps electronically.

Meanwhile, the Nikon Z7 II features 493 focus points, similarly extensive. Its AF tracking shines in demanding scenarios like sports and wildlife, where I noticed better subject retention and less hunting, thanks largely to Nikon’s more mature Z-series AF engine. Burst shooting is one step faster at 10 fps, valuable for capturing decisive moments in fast action.

In low light, the Z7 II retains focus reliability down to -6 EV, while the X-S20 maintains solid AF down to about -4 EV, still impressive but slightly more limited for nocturnal shoots. Both support manual focus, with the Z7 II including focus stacking, a boon for macro or landscape photographers seeking extreme depth of field.

Built to Last? Body, Weather Sealing, and Durability

If you shoot outdoors often, you want a camera that can brave the elements.

The X-S20 unfortunately lacks weather sealing. Its plastic-heavy construction feels sturdy but without dust or moisture protection, you’ll want to avoid harsh conditions or invest in protective covers.

Nikon Z7 II, being a pro model, boasts robust weather sealing against dust and moisture (though not fully waterproof). Its magnesium alloy chassis feels rugged, designed to withstand harsher environments and more aggressive handling. This makes it a clear winner for wildlife, landscape, and professional outdoor use.

Live View and Rear Screens: Touch, Articulation, and Usability

How you interact with your camera’s interface impacts shooting versatility.

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Fujifilm X-S20’s fully articulated 3-inch touchscreen with 1.84 million dots lets you compose flawlessly from low, high, or creative angles. The touchscreen is responsive, allowing quick AF point selection and menu navigation, plus a selfie mode for vlogging or casual shooting - a nice plus for content creators.

Nikon’s Z7 II has a slightly larger 3.2-inch screen with about 2.1 million dots, tilting for flexible composition but missing full articulation or selfie flip. Its touchscreen is also quite capable but feels more geared toward traditional still photography rather than video or personal vlogging setups.

I appreciate Fujifilm’s approach here, especially if you’re frequently shooting videos or need dynamic angle options, though Nikon offers a higher resolution viewfinder (0.80x magnification, 3.69 million dots) versus the X-S20's modest EVF (0.62x, 2.36 million dots), making the Z7 II better for precise manual focusing and composition.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: What’s in Your Bag?

The Fujifilm X-S20 mounts Fujifilm’s well-loved X-series APS-C lenses - already 86 native options strong, including primes and zooms with famed Fujinon glass quality.

Nikon Z7 II uses the expanding Z-mount lens system oriented around full-frame sensors, currently with 15 native lenses listed (and growing fast). While fewer in number, these lenses are of outstanding quality and cover a broad range from wide angles to super telephotos.

Adapters allow Nikon users to tap into the extensive F-mount DSLR lenses, while Fuji’s smaller sensor and lens lineup keeps it compact and lightweight, appealing to street photographers and enthusiasts.

Lens choice is pivotal. Need massive telephoto sports lenses? Nikon is a more straightforward route. Interested in retro-styled primes or lightweight walkaround setups? Fuji’s ecosystem charms.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

For prolonged shooting days, battery efficiency and storage flexibility play important roles.

Fujifilm claims roughly 750 shots per charge (NP-W235 battery), which is impressive for an APS-C mirrorless with IBIS. Single SD card slot supports UHS-II speeds, admirable but less versatile than dual-slot designs.

Nikon’s Z7 II offers around 420 shots per charge (EN-EL15c, or compatible variants), somewhat modest for a pro camera but typical given the larger sensor and EVF. Dual card slots (CFexpress/XQD + SD) enable backup and overflow options, critical for professional workflows.

Realistically, the Fuji’s battery life supports longer outdoor shoots without swapping, but Nikon’s dual-slot system offers peace of mind when file security matters most.

Connectivity and Extras: Video, Wireless, and Miscellaneous Features

Both cameras support built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth for remote control and image transfer, a standard convenience nowadays.

Video shooters will notice the Fujifilm X-S20 supporting impressive 6K DCI 30p and 4K up to 60p in both H.264 and the more efficient H.265 codecs. It also has microphone and headphone ports, sensor-based 5-axis stabilization, and a fully articulated screen, making it highly attractive for solo content creators.

The Nikon Z7 II offers 4K UHD video at 60p 10-bit internally (144 Mbps), with HDMI output for external recorders, microphone and headphone jacks, plus excellent sensor stabilization - still solid but not quite at the 6K Fujifilm range.

Both do time-lapse and interval shooting, but the X-S20 edges ahead for hybrid shooters wanting photo and video flexibility.

Performance Across Photography Genres: Practical Tests and Recommendations

Portraits: Fujifilm’s color rendition, smooth skin tones, and reliable eye/animal detection give it a real edge for natural, pleasing portraits under varied lighting. Nikon offers superior resolution for large prints and more shallow depth effects on full frame - if you prioritize maximum detail, it wins, but Fuji’s pleasing colors feel more ‘ready-to-use’.

Landscape: Nikon Z7 II’s dynamic range, higher resolution, and weather sealing make it tailored for landscape pros. The Fuji is good but lacks the sensor size and durability needed for extended rugged trips.

Wildlife: Fast, accurate AF and 10 fps burst on Nikon deliver in wildlife’s fast action and challenging light. Fuji’s smaller sensor and slower frame rates limit exclusive pros, but casual wildlife shooters can still get strong results.

Sports: Nikon again leads with higher burst speed, AF tracking, and more effective low-light performance. The Fuji’s 8 fps is decent for amateurs but won’t capture fast, unpredictable action reliably.

Street: Fuji’s small size, quiet shutter, and discreet build make it an ideal street camera, ideal for candid shots without drawing attention. Nikon’s bulk and louder shutter hamper quick street work.

Macro: Nikon supports focus stacking and higher resolution files, extending creative flexibility for macro explorers. Fuji’s lack of focus stacking and slower buffer means it’s more limited but still capable with the right lenses.

Night and Astro: Nikon’s superior ISO range and dynamic range deliver cleaner night images and star captures. Fuji is good, but noise becomes more invasive at higher ISOs.

Video: Fujifilm’s 6K and 4K 60p options, better stabilization, and articulated screen make it the more versatile and user-friendly vlogging or hybrid media tool.

Travel: Fuji’s portability, longer battery life, great stabilization, and weather simplicity suit globe-trotters who want a compact powerhouse. Nikon’s size and weight plus dual slots appeal to serious travel pros needing robust gear.

Professional Work: Nikon Z7 II wins for pro reliability, ultra-high-res files, durable body, dual cards, and superior control layout, fitting demanding commercial and studio workflows.

Where Each Camera Truly Shines: Strengths and Weaknesses

Feature Fujifilm X-S20 Nikon Z7 II
Sensor Size/MP APS-C, 26MP, excellent color Full frame, 45.7MP, ultimate detail
Weight/Size Lightweight, compact, travel-friendly Heavier, bulkier, robust build
Autofocus Fast, reliable, excellent face/eye/animal AF More refined tracking, better for sports/wildlife
Lens Ecosystem Large APS-C range (86 lenses) Growing, premium full-frame lens selection
Video Capability 6K/4K60p, H.265, IBIS, articulated screen 4K60p, 10-bit, IBIS, but no 6K or articulation
Weather Sealing None Yes, pro-grade weather sealing
Battery Life ~750 shots, single UHS-II SD slot ~420 shots, dual CFexpress/XQD + SD
Price (Street) ~$1,300 MSRP post-launch ~$3,000 MSRP

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

If you’re a photo enthusiast or hybrid shooter valuing portability, intuitive controls, rich colors, and competent 6K video, the Fujifilm X-S20 is a remarkable package. It suits travel, street, portrait, and hybrid video roles beautifully, especially if you prefer a lighter load and vibrant JPEGs that minimize editing time.

On the other hand, if you’re a professional or advanced enthusiast who demands top image quality, durability, excellent AF for demanding subjects (sports, wildlife), and a seamless pro workflow with dual cards and weather sealing, the Nikon Z7 II is well worth the investment. Its full-frame sensor and lens system deliver class-leading results, especially in demanding and varied conditions.

To Sum Up: Who Should Pick Which?

  • Fujifilm X-S20: Beginners to semi-pros, vloggers, travel photographers, street shooters, hybrid photo/videographers on a budget or wanting lightweight gear.
  • Nikon Z7 II: Professional photographers, commercial shooters, high-res landscape and studio shooters, wildlife/sports specialists needing robust build and advanced AF.

Whatever your choice, both cameras embody modern mirrorless versatility, but your specific priorities will guide which matches you best.

Happy shooting!

Fujifilm X-S20 vs Nikon Z7 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S20 and Nikon Z7 II
 Fujifilm X-S20Nikon Z7 Mark II
General Information
Make FujiFilm Nikon
Model type Fujifilm X-S20 Nikon Z7 Mark II
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2023-05-24 2020-10-14
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 35.9 x 23.9mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 858.0mm²
Sensor resolution 26MP 46MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 6240 x 4160 8256 x 5504
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 102400
Min native ISO 160 64
RAW support
Min enhanced ISO 80 32
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 425 493
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Nikon Z
Number of lenses 86 15
Crop factor 1.5 1
Screen
Screen type Fully articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 3.00 inches 3.2 inches
Resolution of screen 1,840k dots 2,100k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 3,690k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.8x
Features
Min shutter speed 900 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (at ISO 200) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/200 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 6240 x 4160 @30p, 4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 720 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 360 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 50 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 6240x4160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 491 gr (1.08 pounds) 705 gr (1.55 pounds)
Physical dimensions 127 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 750 photos 420 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W235 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-II supported) CFexpress (Type B), XQD, SD (UHS-II)
Card slots One Two
Price at release $1,299 $2,997