Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-T100
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) and E-P5 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X-T200 was launched 6 years later than the E-P5 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the E-P5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-T200 & Olympus PEN E-P5. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Olympus E-P5
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | October 2013 | Fresher by 77 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 2780k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1743k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Fujifilm X-T200
E-P5 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T200 and Olympus E-P5
Fujifilm X-T200 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T200 has got physical measurements of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P5 has sizing of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T200 versus the E-P5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P5 is 80 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-T200 and E-P5.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T200 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-T200 will render greater detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-T200 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-T200 vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-T200 | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-01-22 | 2013-10-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,780k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/320 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370 gr (0.82 lb) | 420 gr (0.93 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 895 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $699 | $389 |