Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
83 Imaging
38 Features
59 Overall
46
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F2.0-2.8) lens
- 353g - 117 x 70 x 57mm
- Launched April 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X10
- Replacement is Fujifilm X30
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X20 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm X20 (2/3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X20 was released 5 months later than the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm X20 scores versus the XZ-2 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X20 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X20 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X20 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm X20 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Fujifilm X20
XZ-2 iHS | Fujifilm X20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X20 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Fujifilm X20 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2013 | December 2012 | Similar generation | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X20 enjoys outer measurements of 117mm x 70mm x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 353 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X20 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X20 and XZ-2 iHS is 83 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X20 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X20 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult.
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X20 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Fujifilm X20 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X20 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-04-29 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-2.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.8" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 85% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/1000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 353g (0.78 lbs) | 346g (0.76 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 70 x 57mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 270 images | 340 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $500 | $450 |