Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b6ff/1b6ff3afb5d5fa69fbccefe62c4e3472b440279b" alt="Hasselblad X1D II 50C front Hasselblad X1D II 50C front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c577/0c577ebcd1204492a751e8570ac71be209665be0" alt="Leica TL front Leica TL front"
85 Imaging
60 Features
58 Overall
59
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2016
- Later Model is Leica TL2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Overview
Below is a complete analysis of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica TL, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and TL (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and TL (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The X1D II 50C was unveiled 2 years later than the TL and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the TL when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica TL. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Leica TL Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica TL
X1D II 50C | TL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | November 2016 | More recent by 32 months |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1230k | Sharper display (+1130k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
TL | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3.60" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica TL
X1D II 50C | TL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Leica TL has measurements of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica TL in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the TL.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2f3d/b2f3d6b469664acec74a312b549b44c2d3b0dd25" alt="Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL size comparison Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and TL is 60 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a66c7/a66c78e4a205616572db8a78648cf17cc2caa7ee" alt="Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL top view buttons comparison Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL top view buttons comparison"
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and TL.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you more detail having an extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24b82/24b8245d35a8e6ee0068b77a62fb984674c2cc87" alt="Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL sensor size comparison Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL sensor size comparison"
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/142d7/142d7559185ab805ce7558ce2136c38eaf0c1e13" alt="Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Screen and Viewfinder comparison Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica TL Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica TL | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica TL |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2016-11-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12500 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 13 | 4 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 384 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-DC13 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $5,750 | $1,009 |