Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- New Model is Olympus E-PL1s

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was released 9 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-PL1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL1
X1D II 50C | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 111 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+2130k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1
X1D II 50C | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL1.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL1 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and E-PL1.
As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 39MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2010-05-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 334 gr (0.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch price | $5,750 | $288 |