Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Announced June 2019
  • Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Updated by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced May 2010
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL1s
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The X1D II 50C was released 9 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-PL1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL1

 X1D II 50C E-PL1 
IntroducedJune 2019May 2010More modern by 111 months
Display size3.60"2.7"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution2360k230kCrisper display (+2130k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL1 X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1

 X1D II 50C E-PL1 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has specifications of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL1.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL1 is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The image below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and E-PL1.

As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 39MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-PL1 Portrait photography advice
91
manual focus
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
megapixel count high (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
exports RAW formats
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL1 as a Street photography camera
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
exports RAW formats
features focus via touch
weather proof
good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
no articulating screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography highlights
73
silent mode (1/10,000 seconds)
megapixel count high (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
features tracking focus
weather proof
low frames per second (2.7 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
44
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
max frames per second low (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (290 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography factors
65
weather proof
features focus via touch
megapixel count high (51 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery pack (290 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-PL1 Landscape photography advice
80
manual focus
change lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
big screen (3.60 inch)
megapixel count high (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
has dual storage slots
does not have image stabilization
missing Timelapse mode
55
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (290 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging details
Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging details
32
touchscreen
video resolution high (2720 x 1530 pxls)
comes with microphone jack
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
Photography Glossary

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL1
General Information
Brand Name Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL1
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2019-06-19 2010-05-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 8272 x 6200 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 117 11
Lens
Lens mount type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 13 107
Focal length multiplier 0.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3.60 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 2,360 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed 1/10000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 2.7fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/2000 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 2720x1530 1280x720
Video data format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 lb) 334 gr (0.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 102 54
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 10.1
DXO Low light rating 4489 487
Other
Battery life - 290 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC card
Storage slots Dual One
Launch price $5,750 $288