Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2

Portability
60
Imaging
86
Features
74
Overall
81
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Introduced June 2019
  • Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
  • Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Released February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL3
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor dimensions.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The X1D II 50C was announced 8 years later than the E-PL2 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL2

 X1D II 50C E-PL2 
ReleasedJune 2019February 2011More recent by 102 months
Display dimension3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k460kCrisper display (+1900k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL2 X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2

 X1D II 50C E-PL2 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has specifications of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).

Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL2.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL2 is 60 and 85 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL2.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with greater detail with its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Portrait photography camera
91
manual focus
flash sync speed is above average (1/2,000 seconds)
resolution is great (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports RAW formats
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Street photography with Olympus E-PL2
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography info
Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography info
74
quiet mode (1/10,000s)
resolution is great (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
slow frames per second (2.7 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
low battery (280 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Travel photography with Olympus E-PL2
65
weather proofing
offers focus by touch
resolution is great (51 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
low battery (280 shots)
MP count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL2 as a Landscape photography camera
81
manual focus
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
very good size screen (3.60 inch)
resolution is great (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
no image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
61
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
low battery (280 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging information
Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging information
32
touch screen
great video quality (2720 x 1530 resolution)
includes external mic jack
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focus
doesn't have selfie friendly display
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL2
General Information
Make Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL2
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-06-19 2011-02-11
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 8272 x 6200 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 117 11
Lens
Lens support Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.60 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 2,360k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/10000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 2.7fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/2000 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 2720x1530 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 lb) 362 gr (0.80 lb)
Dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 102 55
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 10.2
DXO Low light rating 4489 573
Other
Battery life - 280 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-5
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC
Storage slots 2 One
Retail price $5,750 $0