Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL2 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL2 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was announced 8 years later than the E-PL2 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-PL2. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL2
X1D II 50C | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | February 2011 | More recent by 102 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 460k | Crisper display (+1900k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL2 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2
X1D II 50C | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has specifications of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the E-PL2.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL2 is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The visual below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL2.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with greater detail with its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2011-02-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 362 gr (0.80 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Retail price | $5,750 | $0 |