Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
54 Imaging
79 Features
84 Overall
81
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Introduced February 2019
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Hasselblad and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and the S1R (47MP) is fairly well matched but the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and S1R (Full frame) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was brought out 5 months later than the S1R which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1R being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the S1R in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Panasonic S1R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic S1R
X1D II 50C | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.4") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 2100k | Crisper display (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1R over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
S1R | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic S1R
X1D II 50C | S1R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | February 2019 | Similar age | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic S1R has specifications of 149mm x 110mm x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") accompanied by a weight of 1020 grams (2.25 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the X1D II 50C and the S1R.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and S1R is 60 and 54 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The photograph here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and S1R.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic S1R Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2019-02-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 47MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8000 x 6000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 30 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,100 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 5,760 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 1020 gr (2.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 100 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 26.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 3525 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch price | $5,750 | $3,698 |