Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78


88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Announced August 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-PL7

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-PL6, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor size.

The X1D was launched 24 months later than the E-PL6 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the X1D grades vs the E-PL6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D and Olympus PEN E-PL6. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D Gallery and Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Olympus E-PL6
X1D | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2016 | ![]() | August 2014 | Fresher by 24 months |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Hasselblad X1D
E-PL6 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Olympus E-PL6
X1D | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D provides physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL6 has measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D versus Olympus E-PL6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D against the E-PL6.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D and E-PL6 is 60 and 88 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The visual here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D and E-PL6.
To sum up, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X1D featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern X1D should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-06-22 | 2014-08-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 4 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.3fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | 1 |
Launch cost | $6,495 | $300 |