Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
90 Imaging
61 Features
60 Overall
60
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Successor is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched April 2012
- Newer Model is Samsung NX1100
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D versus Samsung NX1000, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and NX1000 (20MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and NX1000 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X1D was released 4 years after the NX1000 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the X1D scores versus the NX1000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D & Samsung NX1000. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D Gallery & Samsung NX1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Samsung NX1000
X1D | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2016 | April 2012 | Newer by 51 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Hasselblad X1D
NX1000 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Samsung NX1000
X1D | NX1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D offers exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX1000 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D versus Samsung NX1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D and the NX1000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D and NX1000 is 60 and 90 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The pic here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and NX1000.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X1D will give greater detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent X1D provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model | Hasselblad X1D | Samsung NX1000 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-06-22 | 2012-04-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 4 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.3fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 840 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $6,495 | $388 |