Clicky

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
60
Imaging
83
Features
74
Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2016
  • New Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma Quattro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D (51MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the X1D (Medium format) and Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The X1D was announced 4 months after the Quattro and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D matches up vs the Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Sigma Quattro

 X1D Quattro 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Hasselblad X1D

 Quattro X1D 
Screen resolution1620k920kClearer screen (+700k dot)

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma Quattro

 X1D Quattro 
LaunchedJune 2016February 2016Same generation
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D has got outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Compare the Hasselblad X1D and Sigma Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the X1D compared to the Quattro.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D and Quattro is 60 and 63 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D and Quattro.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D will produce extra detail with its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively.

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Portrait photography features
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography features
89
manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
amazing MP (51MP)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
includes face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
81
manual focus
sensor resolution is excellent (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D as a Street photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Street photography camera
68
sensor size is big (Medium format)
supports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
fixed screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Sports photography details
Sigma Quattro Sports photography details
70
amazing MP (51MP)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (2.3 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
70
sensor resolution is excellent (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames/s)
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Travel photography advice
Sigma Quattro Travel photography advice
64
weather sealing
boasts focus by touch
amazing MP (51MP)
missing Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
55
environment proof
sensor resolution is excellent (29MP)
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (625g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D Landscape photography factors
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography factors
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
amazing MP (51 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather sealing
has double storage slots
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse function
72
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is excellent (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Hasselblad X1D
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
33
built-in touchscreen
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes external mic port
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
22
includes face detect autofocus
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video ( resolution)
missing microphone jack
more heavy than competition (625g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Hasselblad X1D vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D and Sigma Quattro
 Hasselblad X1DSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Manufacturer Hasselblad Sigma
Model type Hasselblad X1D Sigma sd Quattro
Class Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2016-06-22 2016-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Medium format APS-C
Sensor measurements 44 x 33mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 8272 x 6200 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type Hasselblad X Sigma SA
Available lenses 4 76
Focal length multiplier 0.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.3 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/2000s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 pounds) 625 gr (1.38 pounds)
Dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 4489 not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two One
Launch price $6,495 $738