Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III
56 Imaging
92 Features
78 Overall
86
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X2D (100MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the X2D (Medium format) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X2D was revealed 2 years later than the E-M1 III and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the X2D scores against the E-M1 III with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X2D 100c & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are provided at Hasselblad X2D Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Olympus E-M1 III
X2D | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | February 2020 | Fresher by 32 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Hasselblad X2D
E-M1 III | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X2D and Olympus E-M1 III
X2D | E-M1 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X2D offers outer measurements of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 III has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the X2D compared to the E-M1 III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the X2D and E-M1 III is 56 and 67 respectively.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X2D and E-M1 III.
Plainly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X2D using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X2D will give more detail because of its extra 80MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern X2D provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X2D vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X2D 100c | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-07 | 2020-02-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic IX |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 100MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 11656 x 8742 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 294 | 121 |
Cross focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4080 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.3 frames per sec | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | - | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
Storage slots | 1 | Two |
Price at release | $8,199 | $1,800 |