Clicky

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
94
Imaging
31
Features
10
Overall
22
Kodak EasyShare C140 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Kodak C140
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-108mm (F2.7-4.8) lens
  • 160g - 92 x 63 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Announced February 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

On this page, we are comparing the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the C140 (8MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the C140 (1/2.5") and WG-4 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The C140 was announced 6 years earlier than the WG-4 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the C140 grades versus the WG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak C140 over the Ricoh WG-4

 C140 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Kodak C140

 WG-4 C140 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2009More modern by 61 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-4

 C140 WG-4 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak C140 enjoys outside dimensions of 92mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Check out the Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-4 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the C140 vs the WG-4.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the C140 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing specs. The picture here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the C140 and WG-4.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The C140 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-4 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged C140 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak C140 Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography information
18
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW format
41
has manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
includes face detection focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Kodak C140 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography factors
46
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no RAW format
low maximum ISO (1,000)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Kodak C140 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Sports photography camera
15
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
no phase detect AF
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max frames per second low (2.0 frames per second)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Kodak C140 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography factors
50
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
72
environment sealing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
not so great battery life (240 per charge)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak C140
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4
21
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
low maximum ISO (1,000)
no RAW format
no Timelapse function
54
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
not so great battery life (240 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak C140 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh WG-4 Vlogging highlights
21
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external microphone port
36
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Kodak C140 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak C140 and Ricoh WG-4
 Kodak EasyShare C140Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model type Kodak EasyShare C140 Ricoh WG-4
Category Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2009-01-08 2014-02-05
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1000 6400
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-108mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.7-4.8 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance 13cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 160 gr (0.35 pounds) 230 gr (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 92 x 63 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.5" x 0.9") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 pictures
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID 2 x AA D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $80 $330