Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Kodak M340
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.7) lens
  • 115g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340, both Ultracompact cameras and they are both manufactured by Kodak. The resolution of the M320 (9MP) and the M340 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the M320 (1/2.5") and M340 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M320 was revealed at a similar time to the M340 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M320 matches up vs the M340 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Kodak M340

 M320 M340 

Reasons to pick Kodak M340 over the Kodak M320

 M340 M320 

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Kodak M340

 M320 M340 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009January 2009Same generation
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen size
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M320 has got outside measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Kodak M340 has dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 115 grams (0.25 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the M320 vs the M340.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and M340 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the M320 and M340.

To sum up, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M320 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak M340 will produce greater detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively.

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M340 Portrait photography highlights
19
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (9MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 Street photography information
Kodak M340 Street photography information
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than others (155 grams)
47
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
Kodak M340 Sports photography highlights
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
16
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 Travel photography advice
Kodak M340 Travel photography advice
50
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (155 grams)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
51
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Kodak M340 as a Landscape photography camera
22
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
22
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Kodak M340
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone jack
more heavy than others (155g)
22
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M320 vs Kodak M340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Kodak M340
 Kodak EasyShare M320Kodak EasyShare M340
General Information
Make Kodak Kodak
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Kodak EasyShare M340
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2009-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 3664 x 2748
Highest native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 25 5
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 35-105mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.1-5.7
Macro focus distance 10cm 7cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 115 grams (0.25 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $39 $130