Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Nikon Coolpix S4000 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Nikon S4000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 131g - 95 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Overview

Here is a in-depth review of the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S4000, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Kodak and Nikon. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and S4000 (12MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and S4000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The M320 was manufactured 13 months earlier than the S4000 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M320 scores vs the S4000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Nikon S4000

 M320 S4000 

Reasons to pick Nikon S4000 over the Kodak M320

 S4000 M320 
LaunchedFebruary 2010January 2009Fresher by 13 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Nikon S4000

 M320 S4000 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak M320 provides outer measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 131 grams (0.29 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 versus Nikon S4000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the M320 versus the S4000.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M320 and S4000 is 95 and 96 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M320 and S4000.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Nikon S4000 will give you extra detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older M320 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
Nikon S4000 Portrait photography information
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (9MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
21
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Nikon S4000 as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
heavier than competition (155 grams)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography information
Nikon S4000 Sports photography information
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no phase detect auto focus
17
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Travel photography camera
Nikon S4000 as a Travel photography camera
50
flash built-in
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (155g)
MP count low (9MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
58
flash built-in
really wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 Landscape photography details
Nikon S4000 Landscape photography details
22
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.5")
no RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
32
really wide (27mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M320
Vlogging with Nikon S4000
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (155 grams)
28
really wide (27mm)
touchscreen functionality
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Nikon S4000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Nikon S4000
 Kodak EasyShare M320Nikon Coolpix S4000
General Information
Brand Kodak Nikon
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Nikon Coolpix S4000
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2009-01-08 2010-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor - Expeed C2
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3472 x 2604 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 27-108mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.2-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm 8cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 grams (0.34 pounds) 131 grams (0.29 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 95 x 57 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 EN-EL10
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $39 $200