Clicky

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80

Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
 
Samsung CL80 front
Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
30
Overall
34

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs

Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung CL80
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Additionally Known as ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Overview

Here is a extensive analysis of the Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Kodak and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the M320 (9MP) and CL80 (14MP) and the M320 (1/2.5") and CL80 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The M320 was introduced 12 months earlier than the CL80 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M320 grades against the CL80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Samsung CL80

 M320 CL80 

Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Kodak M320

 CL80 M320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010January 2009Fresher by 12 months
Screen dimension3.7"2.7"Bigger screen (+1")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M320 and Samsung CL80

 M320 CL80 
Manual focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak M320 has got exterior dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the M320 against the CL80.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the M320 and CL80 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by seeing technical specs. The visual below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M320 and CL80.

As you can tell, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M320 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Samsung CL80 will provide extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The older M320 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M320 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung CL80 Portrait photography highlights
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Street photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Street photography camera
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers focus via touch
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
more heavy than average in class (160g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M320 Sports photography factors
Samsung CL80 Sports photography factors
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (9MP)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of phase detect auto focus
38
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak M320
Travel photography with Samsung CL80
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
MP count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
60
offers focus via touch
good resolution (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (160g)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M320 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Landscape photography camera
22
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
MP count low (9 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.5")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
37
big screen (3.7 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M320 Vlogging information
Samsung CL80 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (34mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
27
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than average in class (160g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M320 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M320 and Samsung CL80
 Kodak EasyShare M320Samsung CL80
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M320 Samsung CL80
Also referred to as - ST5500
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2009-01-08 2010-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 9 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3472 x 2604 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 1600 4800
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 34-102mm (3.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-5.1 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3.7 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 155 gr (0.34 lb) 160 gr (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7001 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $39 $400